Skip to main content

An Abstraction Framework for Soft Constraints and Its Relationship with Constraint Propagation

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Abstraction, Reformulation, and Approximation (SARA 2000)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNAI,volume 1864))

Abstract

Soft constraints are very flexible and expressive. However, they also are very complex to handle. For this reason, it may reasonable in several cases to pass to an abstract version of a given soft problem, and then to bring some useful information from the abstract problem to the concrete one. This will hopefully make the search for a solution, or for an optimal solution, of the concrete problem, faster.

In this paper we review the main concepts and properties of our abstraction framework for soft constraints, and we show how it can be used to import constraint propagation algorithms from the abstract scenario to the concrete one. This may be useful when we don’t have any (or any efficient) propagation algorithm in the concrete setting.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. G. Birkhoff and S. MacLane. A Survey of Modern Algebra. MacMillan, 1965.

    Google Scholar 

  2. S. Bistarelli, P. Codognet, Y. Georget, and F. Rossi. Abstracting soft constraints. In K. Apt, E. Monfroy, T. Kakas, and F. Rossi, editors, Proc. 1999 ERCIM/Compulog Net workshop on Constraints, Springer LNAI, 2000, to appear.

    Google Scholar 

  3. S. Bistarelli, H. Fargier, U. Montanari, F. Rossi, T. Schiex, and G. Verfaillie. Semiring-based CSPs and valued CSPs: Basic properties and comparison. In Over-Constrained Systems. Springer-Verlag, LNCS 1106, 1996.

    Google Scholar 

  4. S. Bistarelli, U. Montanari, and F. Rossi. Semiring-based Constraint Solving and Optimization. Journal of the ACM, 44(2):201–236, March 1997.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Y. Caseau. Abstract Interpretation of Constraints on Order-Sorted Domains. In Proc. ILPS91, MIT Press, 1991.

    Google Scholar 

  6. P. Cousot and R. Cousot. Abstract interpretation: A unified lattice model for static analysis of programs by construction or approximation of fixpoints. In Fourth ACM Symp. Principles of Programming Languages, pages 238–252, 1977.

    Google Scholar 

  7. P. Cousot and R. Cousot. Systematic design of program analyis. In Sixth ACM Symp. Principles of Programming Languages, pages 269–282, 1979.

    Google Scholar 

  8. D. Dubois, H. Fargier, and H. Prade. The calculus of fuzzy restrictions as a basis for flexible constraint satisfaction. In Proc. IEEE International Conference on Fuzzy Systems, pages 1131–1136. IEEE, 1993.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Y. Georget and P. Codognet. Compiling semiring-based constraints with clp(fd,s). In M. Maher and J-F. Puget, editors, Proc. CP98. Springer-Verlag, LNCS 1520, 1998.

    Google Scholar 

  10. F. Giunchiglia, A. Villafiorita and T. Walsh. Theories of abstraction. AI Communication, 1997, vol. 10, n. 3–4, pp. 167–176.

    Google Scholar 

  11. F. Giunchiglia and T. Walsh. A theory of abstraction. Artificial Intelligence, 56(2–3):323–390, 1992.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  12. S. deGivry, G. Verfaillie, and T. Schiex. Bounding The Optimum of Constraint Optimization Problems. In G. Smolka, editor, Proc. CP97, pages 405–419. Springer-Verlag, LNCS 1330, 1997.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  13. A.K. Mackworth. Consistency in networks of relations. Artificial Intelligence, 8(1):99–118, 1977.

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  14. A.K. Mackworth. Constraint Satisfaction. Encyclopedia of AI (second edition), John Wiley & Sons, Stuart C. Shapiro ed., Vol. 1, pp. 285–293, 1992.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Zs. Ruttkay. Fuzzy constraint satisfaction. In Proc. 3rd IEEE International Conference on Fuzzy Systems, pages 1263–1268, 1994.

    Google Scholar 

  16. T. Schiex. Possibilistic constraint satisfaction problems, or “how to handle soft constraints?”. In Proc. 8th Conf. of Uncertainty in AI, pages 269–275, 1992.

    Google Scholar 

  17. T. Schiex, H. Fargier, and G. Verfaillie. Valued Constraint Satisfaction Problems: Hard and Easy Problems. In Proc. IJCAI95, pages 631–637. Morgan Kaufmann, 1995.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2000 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Bistarelli, S., Codognet, P., Rossi, F. (2000). An Abstraction Framework for Soft Constraints and Its Relationship with Constraint Propagation. In: Choueiry, B.Y., Walsh, T. (eds) Abstraction, Reformulation, and Approximation. SARA 2000. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 1864. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-44914-0_5

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-44914-0_5

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-67839-7

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-540-44914-0

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics