Skip to main content

Model Generation Theorem Proving with Finite Interval Constraints

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Computational Logic — CL 2000 (CL 2000)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNAI,volume 1861))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

Model generation theorem proving (MGTP) is a class of deduction procedures for first-order logic that were successfully used to solve hard combinatorial problems. For some applications the representation of models in MGTP and its extension CMGTP is too redundant. Here we suggest to extend members of model candidates in such a way that a predicate p can have not only terms as arguments, but at certain places also subsets of totally ordered finite domains. The ensuing language and deduction system relies on constraints based on finite intervals in totally ordered sets and is called IV-MGTP. It is related to constraint programming and many-valued logic, but differs significantly from either. We show soundness and completeness of IV-MGTP. First results with our implementation show considerable potential of the method.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. S. Abdennadher and H. Schütz. CHRV: A flexible query language. In T. Andreasen, H. Christansen, and H. L. Larsen, eds., Proc. Int. Conf. on Flexible Query Answering Systems FQAS, Roskilde, Denmark, vol. 1495 of LNCS, pp. 1–15. Springer-Verlag, 1998.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  2. P. Baumgartner, U. Furbach, and I. Niemelä. Hyper tableaux. In J. J. Alferes, L. M. Pereira, and E. Orlowska, eds., Proc. European Workshop: Logics in Artificial Intelligence, vol. 1126 of LNCS, pp. 1–17. Springer-Verlag, 1996.

    Google Scholar 

  3. F. Benhamou. Interval constraint logic programming. In A. Podelski, editor, Constraint programming: basics and trends, Chatillon Spring School, Chatillonsur-Seine, France, 1994, vol. 910 of LNCS, pp. 1–21. Springer-Verlag, 1995.

    Google Scholar 

  4. H. Fujita and R. Hasegawa. A model generation theorem prover in KL1 using a ramified-stack algorithm. In K. Furukawa, editor, Proc. 8th Int. Conf. on Logic Programming, Paris/France, pp. 535–548. MIT Press, 1991.

    Google Scholar 

  5. R. Hähnle. Automated Deduction in Multiple-Valued Logics. OUP, 1994.

    Google Scholar 

  6. R. Hähnle. Tableaux and related methods. In A. Robinson and A. Voronkov, eds., Handbook of Automated Reasoning. Elsevier Science Publishers, to appear, 2000.

    Google Scholar 

  7. R. Hähnle, R. Hasegawa, and Y. Shirai. Model generation theorem proving with interval constraints. In F. Benhamou, W. J. Older, M. van Emden, and P. van Hentenryck, eds., Proc. of ILPS Post-Conf. Workshop on Interval Constraints, Portland/OR, USA, Dec. 1995.

    Google Scholar 

  8. R. Hasegawa and H. Fujita. A new implementation technique for a Model-Generation Theorem Prover to solve constraint satisfaction problems. Research Reports on Inf. Sci. and El. Eng. Vol. 4, No. 1, pp. 57–62, Kyushu Univ., 1999.

    Google Scholar 

  9. R. Hasegawa, H. Fujita, and M. Koshimura. MGTP: a model generation theorem prover—its advanced features and applications. In D. Galmiche, editor, Proc. Int. Conf. on Automated Reasoning with Analytic Tableaux and Related Methods, Ponta-Mousson, France, vol. 1227 of LNCS, pp. 1–15. Springer-Verlag, 1997.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  10. M. Kifer and E. L. Lozinskii. A logic for reasoning with inconsistency. Journal of Automated Reasoning, 9(2):179–215, Oct. 1992.

    Google Scholar 

  11. M. Kifer and V. S. Subrahmanian. Theory of generalized annotated logic programming and its applications. Journal of Logic Programming, 12:335–367, 1992.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  12. J. J. Lu. Logic programming with signs and annotations. Journal of Logic and Computation, 6(6):755–778, 1996.

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  13. U. Montanari and F. Rossi. Finite Domain Constraint Solving and Constraint Logic Programming. In F. Benhamou and A. Colmerauer, eds., Constraint Logic Programming: Selected Research, pp. 201–221. The MIT press, 1993.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Y. Shirai and R. Hasegawa. Two approaches for finite-domain constraint satisfaction problem: CP and MGTP. In L. Stirling, editor, Proc. 12th Int. Conf. on Logic Programming, pp. 249–263. MIT Press, 1995.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2000 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Hähnle, R., Hasegawa, R., Shirai, Y. (2000). Model Generation Theorem Proving with Finite Interval Constraints. In: Lloyd, J., et al. Computational Logic — CL 2000. CL 2000. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 1861. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-44957-4_19

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-44957-4_19

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-67797-0

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-540-44957-7

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics