Abstract
A theory of contextual propositions for indicative conditionals is presented. The main challenge is to give a precise account of how the dynamics of possible worlds depends on epistemic context. Robert Stalnaker suggested in [Stalnaker 84] that even when selection functions for evaluating indicatives cannot be defined in terms of epistemic context, they can be importantly constrained by a principle of context dependency that we adopt here. In addition, we show how to define a gradation of possibilities for each point in an epistemic context by taking into account a proposal first introduced by Wolfgang Spohn in [Spohn 87] and later refined by Darwiche and Pearl in [Darwiche & Pearl 97]. The resulting theory of contextual propositions (unlike some alternative views) is shown to be compatible with basic qualitative consequences of the Bayesian principle of conditionalization (which is frequently used in probabilistic semantics for indicative conditionals).
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Arlo-Costa, H. 2001. ‘Bayesian Epistemology and Epistemic Conditionals: On the Status of the Export-Import Laws,’ Journal of Philosophy, Vol. XCVIII,11, 555–598.
Arlo-Costa, H. forthcoming ‘Epistemological foundations for the representation of discourse context,’ forthcoming in Studies on Language and Information (CSLI), Stanford.
Arlo-Costa, H., and Levi, I. 1996. ‘Two notions of epistemic validity’. Synthese, volume 109, No. 2, 217–262.
Cross, C., and Nute, D. 1998 ‘Conditional Logic,’ in Handbook of Philosophical Logic, second edition, Vol III Extensions of Classical Logic (eds.) D. Gabbay and F. Guenthner, Reidel, Dordrecht.
Darwiche, A., and Pearl, J. 1997. On the logic of iterated belief revision. Artificial Intelligence 89(1–2):1–31.
Gärdenfors, P. 1988 Knowledge in Flux, Bradford Book, MIT Press, Cambridge, Mass.
Gibbard, A. 1980, ‘Two recent theories of conditionals,’ in Ifs, (eds.) W. Harper, R. Stalnaker, G. Pearce, Reidel Publishing Company, pp. 211–247.
McGee, V. 1994. Learning the impossible. In Eells, E., and Skyrms, B., eds., Probability and Conditionals: Belief Revision and Rational Decision. Cambridge University Press.
Lewis, D. 1973. Counterfactuals, Basil Blackwell, Oxford.
Lewis, D. 1976. ‘Probabilities of conditionals and conditional probabilities’, Philosophical Review vol. no. 85, pp. 297–315.
Ramsey, F.P. 1990. Philosophical Papers, (ed.) Mellor, H. A., Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
Shackle, G.L.S. 1961 Decision, Order and Time in Human Affairs, (2nd edition), Cambridge, Mass., CUP.
Spohn, W. 1987. ‘Ordinal conditional functions: a dynamic theory of epistemic states,’ Causation in Decision, Belief Change and Statistics, W.L. Harper and B. Skyrms eds., Dordrecht: Reidel, vol 2, 105–134.
Stalnaker, R. 1984 newblock Indicative Conditionals, in Conditionals, (ed.) F. Jackson, OUP.
Stalnaker, R. 1998. ‘On the representation of context,’ Journal of Logic, Language and Information 7, 3–19.
van Fraassen, B. 1976 ‘Probabilities of Conditionals,’ in Harper and Hooker (eds.) Foundations of Probability Theory, Statistical Inference and Statistical Theories of Science Vol. I, Reidel, Dordrecht, 261–308.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2003 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg
About this paper
Cite this paper
Costa, H.A. (2003). A Theory of Contextual Propositions for Indicatives. In: Blackburn, P., Ghidini, C., Turner, R.M., Giunchiglia, F. (eds) Modeling and Using Context. CONTEXT 2003. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 2680. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-44958-2_2
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-44958-2_2
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg
Print ISBN: 978-3-540-40380-7
Online ISBN: 978-3-540-44958-4
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive