Skip to main content

A Theory of Contextual Propositions for Indicatives

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Modeling and Using Context (CONTEXT 2003)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNAI,volume 2680))

  • 626 Accesses

Abstract

A theory of contextual propositions for indicative conditionals is presented. The main challenge is to give a precise account of how the dynamics of possible worlds depends on epistemic context. Robert Stalnaker suggested in [Stalnaker 84] that even when selection functions for evaluating indicatives cannot be defined in terms of epistemic context, they can be importantly constrained by a principle of context dependency that we adopt here. In addition, we show how to define a gradation of possibilities for each point in an epistemic context by taking into account a proposal first introduced by Wolfgang Spohn in [Spohn 87] and later refined by Darwiche and Pearl in [Darwiche & Pearl 97]. The resulting theory of contextual propositions (unlike some alternative views) is shown to be compatible with basic qualitative consequences of the Bayesian principle of conditionalization (which is frequently used in probabilistic semantics for indicative conditionals).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Arlo-Costa, H. 2001. ‘Bayesian Epistemology and Epistemic Conditionals: On the Status of the Export-Import Laws,’ Journal of Philosophy, Vol. XCVIII,11, 555–598.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  2. Arlo-Costa, H. forthcoming ‘Epistemological foundations for the representation of discourse context,’ forthcoming in Studies on Language and Information (CSLI), Stanford.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Arlo-Costa, H., and Levi, I. 1996. ‘Two notions of epistemic validity’. Synthese, volume 109, No. 2, 217–262.

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  4. Cross, C., and Nute, D. 1998 ‘Conditional Logic,’ in Handbook of Philosophical Logic, second edition, Vol III Extensions of Classical Logic (eds.) D. Gabbay and F. Guenthner, Reidel, Dordrecht.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Darwiche, A., and Pearl, J. 1997. On the logic of iterated belief revision. Artificial Intelligence 89(1–2):1–31.

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  6. Gärdenfors, P. 1988 Knowledge in Flux, Bradford Book, MIT Press, Cambridge, Mass.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Gibbard, A. 1980, ‘Two recent theories of conditionals,’ in Ifs, (eds.) W. Harper, R. Stalnaker, G. Pearce, Reidel Publishing Company, pp. 211–247.

    Google Scholar 

  8. McGee, V. 1994. Learning the impossible. In Eells, E., and Skyrms, B., eds., Probability and Conditionals: Belief Revision and Rational Decision. Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Lewis, D. 1973. Counterfactuals, Basil Blackwell, Oxford.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Lewis, D. 1976. ‘Probabilities of conditionals and conditional probabilities’, Philosophical Review vol. no. 85, pp. 297–315.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Ramsey, F.P. 1990. Philosophical Papers, (ed.) Mellor, H. A., Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Shackle, G.L.S. 1961 Decision, Order and Time in Human Affairs, (2nd edition), Cambridge, Mass., CUP.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Spohn, W. 1987. ‘Ordinal conditional functions: a dynamic theory of epistemic states,’ Causation in Decision, Belief Change and Statistics, W.L. Harper and B. Skyrms eds., Dordrecht: Reidel, vol 2, 105–134.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Stalnaker, R. 1984 newblock Indicative Conditionals, in Conditionals, (ed.) F. Jackson, OUP.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Stalnaker, R. 1998. ‘On the representation of context,’ Journal of Logic, Language and Information 7, 3–19.

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  16. van Fraassen, B. 1976 ‘Probabilities of Conditionals,’ in Harper and Hooker (eds.) Foundations of Probability Theory, Statistical Inference and Statistical Theories of Science Vol. I, Reidel, Dordrecht, 261–308.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2003 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Costa, H.A. (2003). A Theory of Contextual Propositions for Indicatives. In: Blackburn, P., Ghidini, C., Turner, R.M., Giunchiglia, F. (eds) Modeling and Using Context. CONTEXT 2003. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 2680. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-44958-2_2

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-44958-2_2

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-40380-7

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-540-44958-4

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics