Skip to main content

Adapting to the User’s Internet Search Strategy

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNAI,volume 2702))

Abstract

World Wide Web search engines typically return thousands of results to the users. To avoid users browsing through the whole list of results, search engines use ranking algorithms to order the list according to predefined criteria. In this paper, we present Toogle, a front-end to the Google search engine for both desktop browsers and mobile phones. For a given search query, Toogle first ranks results using Google’s algorithm and, as the user browses through the result list, uses machine learning techniques to infer a model of her search goal and to adapt accordingly the order in which the results are presented. We describe preliminary experimental results that show the effectiveness of Toogle.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Anderson C. R, Domingos P. and Weld D. S. Adaptive web navigation for wireless devices. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Artificial Intelligence, Morgan Kaufmann, (2001).

    Google Scholar 

  2. Beeferman D. and Berger A. Agglomerative clustering of a search engine query log. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining, ACM, (2000).

    Google Scholar 

  3. Brusilovsky, P. Methods and Techniques of Adaptive Hypermedia. User Modeling and User-Adapted Interaction 6(2–3), (1996), 87–129.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Dumais S., Platt J., Heckerman D. and Sahami M. Inductive Learning Algorithms and Representations for Text Classification. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Information and Knowledge Management, ACM, (1998), 148–155.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Fu X., Budzik, J. and Hammond K.J. Mining navigation history for recommendation. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Intelligent User Interfaces, ACM, (2000).

    Google Scholar 

  6. Good I.J. The Estimation of Probabilities: An Essay on Modern Bayesian Methods. MIT Press, (1965).

    Google Scholar 

  7. Joachims T. SVM-Light Support Vector Machine, (1999). http://svmlight.joachims.org/.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Joachims T. Optimizing Search Engine using Clickthrough Data. In Proceedings of the ACM Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining, ACM, (2002).

    Google Scholar 

  9. Joachims T., Freitag D. and Mitchell T. WebWatcher: A Tour Guide for the World Wide Web. In Proceedings of the Fifteenth International Conference on Artificial Intelligence, Morgan Kaufmann, (1997).

    Google Scholar 

  10. Lieberman H. Letizia: An Agent That Assists Web Browsing. In Proceedings of the Fifteenth International Conference on Artificial Intelligence, Morgan Kaufmann, Montreal, Canada, (1995).

    Google Scholar 

  11. Lieberman, H. Autonomous Interface Agents. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Human Computer Interaction, ACM, (1997).

    Google Scholar 

  12. Lau T. and Horvitz E. Patterns of Search: Analyzing and Modeling Web Query Refinement. In Proceedings of the International Conference on User Modeling, ACM, (1998).

    Google Scholar 

  13. Liu H., Lieberman H. and Selker T. GOOSE: A Goal-Oriented Search Engine With Commonsense. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Adaptive Hypermedia and Adaptive Web Based System, LNCS 2347, p. 253, (2002).

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  14. McCallum A. K. Bow: A toolkit for statistical language modeling, text retrieval, classification and clustering, 1996. http://www.cs.cmu.edu/~mccallum/bow.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Perkowitz M. and Etzioni O. Towards adaptive web sites: conceptual framework and case study. Artificial Intelligence Journal, 118(1–2), (2000).

    Google Scholar 

  16. Vapnik V. The Nature of Statistical Learning Theory. Springer-Verlag, New-York, (1995).

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  17. White R. W., I. Ruthven and J. M. Jose. Finding Relevant Documents Using Top Ranking Sentences: An Evaluation of Two Alternative Schemes. In Proceedings of the 25th International Conference on Research and Development in Information Retrieval, ACM, 2002.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2003 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Ruvini, JD. (2003). Adapting to the User’s Internet Search Strategy. In: Brusilovsky, P., Corbett, A., de Rosis, F. (eds) User Modeling 2003. UM 2003. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 2702. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-44963-9_9

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-44963-9_9

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-40381-4

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-540-44963-8

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics