Abstract
In the present study spatial behavior was assessed by utilization of a desktop virtual environment and a locomotor maze task. In the first phase of the experiment, two groups of healthy middle-aged participants had to learn and remember five out of 20 target locations either in a “real” locomotor maze or an equivalent VR-version of this maze. The group with the VR-training was also confronted with the task in the real maze after achieving a learning criterion. Though acquisition rates were widely equivalent in the VR- and locomotor groups, VR participants had more problems learning the maze in the very first learning trials. Good transfer was achieved from the virtual to the real version of the maze by this group and they were significantly better in the acquisition phase of the locomotor task than the group that had not received VR-training. In the second phase of the experiment -the probe trials- when the cue configuration was changed the group with the VR-training seemed to have specific problems. A considerable number of participants of this group were not able to transfer information.
This research was supported by the DFG governmental program “Spatial Cognition” (Le 846/2–3).
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Antunano, M. & Brown, J. (1999). The use of Virtual Reality in Spatial Disorientation Training. Aviation, Space, and Environmental Medicine. 70(10), 1048.
Emmett, A. (1994). Virtual reality helps steady the gait of Parkinson’s patients. Computer Graphics World, 17,17–18.
Foreman, N., Stirk, J., Pohl, J., Mandelkow, L., Lehnung, M., Herzog, A., & Leplow, B. (2000). Spatial information transfer from virtual to real versions of the Kiel locomotor maze. Behavioral Brain Research, 112, 53–61.
Johnson, D.A., Rose, F.D., Rushton, S., Pentland, B., & Attree, E.A. (1998). Virtual reality: a new prosthesis for brain injury rehabilitation. Scottish Medical Journal, 43(3), 81.83.
Larson, P., Rizzo, A.A., Buckwalter, J.G., Van Rooyen, A., Krantz, K., Neumann, U., Kesselman, C., Thiebeaux, M., & Van der Zaag, C. (1999). Gender issue in the use of virtual environments. CyberPsychology & Behavior, 2(2), 113–123.
Lehrl, S. (1975). Mehrfachwahl-Wortschatztest MWT-B Erlangen: perimed Verlag.
Leplow, B., Höll, D., Zeng, L., & Mehdorn, M. (1998). Spatial Orientation and Spatial Memory Within a ‘Locomotor Maze’ for Humans. In Chr. Freksa, Chr Habel and K. F. Wender (Eds.) Lecture Notes of Artificial Intelligence 1404/ Computer Sciences/ Spatial Cognition, pp 429–446, Springer: Berlin.
Leplow, B., Höll, D., Zeng, L., & Mehdorn, M. (2000). Investigation of Age and Sex Effects in Spatial Cognition. In Chr. Freksa, W. Brauer, Chr Habel and K. F. Wender (Eds.) Lecture Notes of Artificial Intelligence 1849/ Computer Sciences/ Spatial Cognition, pp 399–418, Springer: Berlin.
Mehlitz, M., Kleinoeder, T., Weniger, G., & Rienhoff, O. (1998). Design of a virtual reality laboratory for interdisciplinary medical application. Medinfo, 9(2), 1051–1055.
Morris, R.G.M. (1981). Spatial localization does not require the presence of local cues. Learning and Motivation, 12, 239–260.
Nelson, H.E. & O’Conell, A. (1978). Dementia: The estimation of pre-morbid intelligence levels using a new adult reading test. Cortex, 14, 234–244.
Reiss, T. & Weghorst, S. (1995). Augmented reality in the treatment of Parkinson’s disease. In Interactive technology and the paradigm for healthcare. Edited by Morgan, K. Satawa, R.M., Sieburg, H.B., Mattheus, R., Christensen, J.P. Amsterdam IOS Press; 415–422.
Regan, E., Price, K.R. (1994). The frequency of occurence and severity of side-effects of immersion virtual reality. Aviat Space Environmental Medicine, 65, 527–530.
Riva, G. (1998). Virtual Environments in Neuroscience. Transactions on Information Technology in Biomedicine, 2(4). 275–281.
Rizzo, A.A. & Buckwalter, J.G. (1997). Virtual reality and cognitive assessment and rehabilitation: the state of the art. Studies in Health Technology and Informatics, 44, 123.145.
Rose, F.D., E.A. Attree, E.A., & Johnson, D.A. (1996). Virtual reality. an assistive technology in neurological rehabilitation. Current Opinion in Neurology, 9, 461–467.
Rose, F.D., Attree, E.A., & Brooks, B.M. (1997). “Virtual environments in neuropsychological assessment and rehabilitation” in Virtual Reality in Neuro-Psycho-Physiology, G. Riva (Ed.) Amsterdam, The Netherlands: IOS, 147–156.
Skelton, R.W., Bukach, C.M., Laurance, H.E., Thomas, K.G., & Jacobs, J.W. (2000). Humans with traumatic brain injuries show place-learning deficits in computer-generated virtual space. Journal of Clinical and Experimental Neuropsychology, 22(2), 157–175.
Thomas, K.G., Hsu, M., Laurance, H.E., Nadel, L., & Jacobs, J.W. (2001). Place learning in virtual space. III: Investigation of spatial navigation training procedures and their application to fMRI and Clinical neuropsychology. Behavioral Research Methods Instruments, and Computers, 33(1), 21–37.
Wilson, B.A., Cockburn, J., & Baddeley, A.D. (1985). The Rivermead Behavioural Memory Test. Thames Valley Test Company, Suffolk, England.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2003 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg
About this paper
Cite this paper
Höll, D., Leplow, B., Schönfeld, R., Mehdorn, M. (2003). Is It Possible to Learn and Transfer Spatial Information from Virtual to Real Worlds?. In: Freksa, C., Brauer, W., Habel, C., Wender, K.F. (eds) Spatial Cognition III. Spatial Cognition 2002. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 2685. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-45004-1_9
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-45004-1_9
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg
Print ISBN: 978-3-540-40430-9
Online ISBN: 978-3-540-45004-7
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive