Skip to main content

Towards Patient-Specific Anatomical Model Generation for Finite Element-Based Surgical Simulation

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Surgery Simulation and Soft Tissue Modeling (IS4TM 2003)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNCS,volume 2673))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

This paper presents ongoing research on a semi-automatic method for computing, from CT and MR data, patient-specific anatomical models used in surgical simulation. Surgical simulation is a software implementation enabling a user to interact, through virtual surgical tools, with an anatomical model representative of relevant tissues and endowed with realistic constitutive properties. Up to now, surgical simulators have generally been characterized by their reliance on a generic anatomical model, typically obtained at the cost of extensive user interaction, and by biomechanical computations based on mass-spring networks.

We propose a minimally supervised procedure for extracting from a set of CT and MR scans a highly descriptive tissue classification, a set of triangulated surfaces coinciding with relevant tissue boundaries, and volumetric meshes bounded by these surfaces and comprised of tetrahedral elements of homogeneous tissue. In this manner, a series of models could be obtained with little user interaction, allowing surgeons to be trained on a large set of pathologies which are clinically representative of those they are likely to encounter. The application of this procedure to the simulation of pituitary surgery is described. Furthermore, the resolution of the surface and tissue meshes is explicitly controllable with a few simple parameters. In turn, the target mesh resolution can be expressed as a radially varying function from a central point, in this case coinciding with a point on the pituitary gland.

A further objective is to produce anatomical models which can interact with a published finite element-based biomechanical simulation technique which partitions the volume into separate parent and child meshes: the former sparse and linearly elastic; the latter dense, centered on the region of clinical interest and possibly nonlinearly elastic.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. O.R. Astley & V. Hayward, Multirate Haptic Simulation Achieved by Coupling Finite Element Meshes Through Norton Equivalents, IEEE Int. Conf. Rob. & Auto., 1998.

    Google Scholar 

  2. O.R. Astley, A Software Architecture for Surgical Simulation Using Haptics, Ph.D. thesis, McGill University, 1999.

    Google Scholar 

  3. O.R. Astley & V. Hayward, Design Constraints for Haptic Surgery Simulation, Proc. IEEE Int. Conf. Rob. & Auto, pp. 2446–2451, 2000.

    Google Scholar 

  4. M.A. Audette & K. Chinzei, Global Structure-preserving Voxel Classification for Patient-specific Surgical Simulation, Proc. IEEE EMBS-BMES Conf., 2002.

    Google Scholar 

  5. M.A. Audette et al., A Review of Biomechanical Modeling of the Brain for Intrasurgical Displacement Estimation and Medical Simulation, submitted for publication, Annals of Biomed. Eng, 2003.

    Google Scholar 

  6. A.M. Bensaid et al., Partially Supervised Clustering for Image Segmentation, Pattern Recognition, Vol. 29, No. 5, pp. 859–871, 1996.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. G.C. Burdea, Force and Touch Feedback for Virtual Reality, John Wiley & Sons, 1996.

    Google Scholar 

  8. P. Cappabianca et al., Atlas of Endoscopic Anatomy for Endonasal Intracranial Surgery, Springer, 2001.

    Google Scholar 

  9. V.B. Chial, S. Greenish & A.M. Okamura, On the Display of Haptic Recordings for Cutting Biological Tissues, Haptics 2002-IEEE Virtual Reality Conference, 2002.

    Google Scholar 

  10. I. Ciric et al., Complications of Transsphenoidal Surgery: Results of a National Survey, Review of the Literature, and Personal Experience, Neurosurg., Vol. 40, No. 2., pp. 225–236, Feb. 1997.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  11. L.D. Cohen & R. Kimmel, Global Minimum for Active Contour Models: A Minimal Path Approach, Int. J. Comp. Vis., Vol. 24, No. 1, pp. 57–78, 1997.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. H. Delingette, General Object Reconstruction Based on Simplex Meshes, Int. J. Comp. Vis., Vol. 32, No. 2, pp. 111–146, 1999.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. H. Delingette and J. Montagnat, Shape and Topology Constraints on Parametric Active Contours Comp. Vis. and Image Under., Vol. 83, pp. 140–171, 2001.

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  14. T. Deschamps & L.D. Cohen, Fast Extraction of Minimal Paths in 3D Images and Applications to Virtual Endoscopy, Med. Imag. Anal., Vol. 5, pp. 281–299, 2001.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. A. Fuchs, Almost Regular Triangulations of Trimmed NURBS-Solids, Eng. w. Comput., Vol. 17, pp. 55–65, 2001.

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  16. K. Held et al., Markov Random Field Segmentation of Brain MR Images, IEEE Trans. Med. Imag., Vol. 16, No. 6, pp. 878–886, 1997.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. J.-O. Lachaud & A. Montanvert, Deformable Meshes with Automated Topology Changes for Coarse-to-fine Three-dimensional Surface Extration, Med. Imag. Anal., Vol. 3, No. 2, pp. 187–207, 1998.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. M. Mahvash & V. Hayward, Haptics Rendering of Cutting: A Fracture Mechanics Approach, Haptics-e-The Electronic Journal of Haptics Research, Vol. 2, No. 3, Nov. 20, 2001.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Microstar Laboratories, http://www.mstarlabs.com .

  20. N.A. Mohamed et al., Modified Fuzzy C-Mean in Medical Image Segmentation, Proc. IEEE ICASSP, pp. 3429–3432, 1999.

    Google Scholar 

  21. NVidia Corp., http://www.nvidia.com .

  22. J.T. Oden, Finite Elements of Nonlinear Continua, McGraw-Hill, 1972.

    Google Scholar 

  23. V.N. Parthasarathy et al., A Comparison of Tetrahedron Quality Measures, Fin. Elem. in Anal. & Des., Vol. 15, pp. 255–261, 1993.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. J.A. Sethian, Level Set Methods and Fast Marching Methods: Evolving interfaces in computational geometry, fluid mechanics, computer vision, and materials science, 2nd ed., Cambridge University Press, 1999.

    Google Scholar 

  25. T.S. Sumanaweera et al., MR Susceptibility Misregistration Correction, IEEE Trans. Med. Imag., Vol. 12, No. 2, June 1993.

    Google Scholar 

  26. A. Vasilevskiy & K. Siddiqi, Flux Maximizing Geometric Flows, IEEE Trans. Patt. Anal. & Mach. Intel., Vol. 24, No. 2, pp. 1565–1578, 2002.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. P. Viola & W.M. Wells, Alignment by Maximization of Mutual Information, Proc. 5th Int. Conf. Computer Vision, pp. 15–23, 1995.

    Google Scholar 

  28. O.C. Zienkiewicz, The Finite Element Method, McGraw-Hill, 1977.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2003 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Audette, M.A., Fuchs, A., Astley, O., Koseki, Y., Chinzei, K. (2003). Towards Patient-Specific Anatomical Model Generation for Finite Element-Based Surgical Simulation. In: Ayache, N., Delingette, H. (eds) Surgery Simulation and Soft Tissue Modeling. IS4TM 2003. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 2673. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-45015-7_33

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-45015-7_33

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-40439-2

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-540-45015-3

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics