Abstract
In this paper we provide a policy based framework for managing and modelling agent social interaction. We specify and implement agent conversation patterns and protocols using an agent policy language. These patterns classify agent interaction, using a blend of communication protocols, security and management policies as well as Object Oriented software design principles. All services, including management services, interact with their agent clients using the same conversation patterns as defined in this paper. Any conversation begins with three steps: requesting a service, negotiating a conversation pattern, and establishing pattern roles. Role theory and reusable policy specifications regulate the way agents participate, providing a rich source of information for conversation management. Further, role theory is used to define agent roles and relationships, which are then described using the Agent Policy Language in terms of policies (i.e. obligations and authorisations). Policy based agents have the ability to interpret policies and assume roles for a certain interaction pattern dynamically. The methodology promotes platform independence and fits the needs of a modular, distributed environment; enabling services to use the powerful ‘plug-and-play’ concept. Co-operation patterns being more complex are built upon conversation patterns, but also describe the ‘social’ relationships between agents based on beliefs, desires and intentions.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
C. Stergiou, G. Arys, “Implementing Agent Management Using Conversation Patterns and Role Theory”, Springer Lecture Notes in AI 2070, June 2001.
C. Stergiou, G. Arys, “A Policy based Framework for Agents: On the Specification of an Agent Policy Language including roles, Relationships, Conversation & Co-operation Patterns”, Autonomous Agents 2003, Melbourne, Australia, July 2003.
E.C. Lupu, “A Role-Based Framework for Distributed Systems Management”. Ph.D. Thesis, University of London, July 1998.
N.C. Damianou, “A Policy Framework for Management of Distributed Systems”. Ph.D. Thesis, University of London, February 2002.
M. E. Bratman. Intentions, “Plans and Practical Reason”. Harvard University Press, Massachusetts, 1987.
P.R. Cohen and H.J. Levensque. “Intention is choice with commitment”. Artificial Intelligence, 42(3), 1990.
J. Ferber, O. Gutknetch, “A meta-model for the analysis and organisations in multi-agent systems”. In Y. Demazeau, editor, ICMAS’98, pages 128–135, IEEE press 1998.
J. Broersen, M. Dastani, J. Hulstijn, z. Huang, L. Torre, “The BOID Architecture — Conflicts between Beliefs, Obligations, Intentions and Desires”, In the conference proceedings of Autonomous Agents 2001, Montreal Canada.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2003 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg
About this paper
Cite this paper
Stergiou, C., Arys, G. (2003). A Policy Based Framework for Software Agents. In: Chung, P.W.H., Hinde, C., Ali, M. (eds) Developments in Applied Artificial Intelligence. IEA/AIE 2003. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 2718. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-45034-3_43
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-45034-3_43
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg
Print ISBN: 978-3-540-40455-2
Online ISBN: 978-3-540-45034-4
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive