Skip to main content

Majority Equilibrium for Public Facility Allocation

Preliminary Version

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNCS,volume 2697))

Abstract

In this work, we consider the public facility allocation problem decided through a voting process uner the majority rule. A locations of the public facility is a majority rule winner if there is no other location in the network where more than half of the voters would have be closer to than the majority rule winner. We develop fast algorithms for interesting cases with nice combinatorial structures. We show that the general problem, where the number of public facilities is more than one and is consider part of the input size, is NP-hard. Finally, we discuss majority rule decision making for related models.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. G. Demange, Spatial Models of Collective Choice, in Locational Analysis of Public Facilities, (eds. J. F.Thisse and H. G. Zoller), North-Holland Publishing Company, 1983.

    Google Scholar 

  2. G. Demange, Single Peaked Orders on a Tree, Math. Soc. Sci. 3 (1982), pp.389–396.

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  3. X. Deng, Z. Li and S. Wang, On Computation of Arbitrage for Markets with Friction, Lecture Notes in Computer Science 1858 (2000), pp. 310–319.

    Google Scholar 

  4. X. Deng, Z.F. Li and S. Wang, Computational Complexity of Arbitrage in Frictional Security Market. International Journal of Foundations of Computer Science, Vol. 13, No.5, (2002), 681–684.

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  5. X. Deng and C. Papadimitriou, On the Complexity of Cooperative Game Solution Concepts, Mathematics of Operations Research 19(2)(1994), pp. 257–266.

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  6. X. Deng and C. Papadimitriou, Decision Making by Hierarchies of Discordant Agents, Mathematical Programming 86(2)(1999), pp.417–431.

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  7. X. Deng, C. Papadimitriou and S. Safra, On Complexity of Equilibrium. STOC 2002, May, 2002, Montreal, Canada, pp.67–71.

    Google Scholar 

  8. P. Hansen and J.-F. Thisse, Outcomes of Voting and Planning: Condorcet, Weber and Rawls Locations, Journal of Public Economics 16(1981), pp.1–15.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. N. Megiddo, “Computational Complexity and the game theory approach to cost allocation for a tree,” Mathematics of Operations Research 3, pp. 189–196, 1978.

    MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  10. D. Romero, Variations sur l’effet Condorcet, Thèse de 3ème cycle, Université de Grenoble, Grenoble, 1978.

    Google Scholar 

  11. J. Schummer and R.V. Vohra, Strategy-proof Location on a Network, Journal of Economic Theory 104(2002), pp.405–428.

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2003 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Chen, L., Deng, X., Fang, Q., Tian, F. (2003). Majority Equilibrium for Public Facility Allocation. In: Warnow, T., Zhu, B. (eds) Computing and Combinatorics. COCOON 2003. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 2697. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-45071-8_44

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-45071-8_44

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-40534-4

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-540-45071-9

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics