Abstract
The distributed constraint satisfaction problem (DisCSP) can be viewed as a 4-tuple (X, D, C, A), where X is a set of n variables, D is a set of n domains (one domain for each of the n variables), C is a set of constraints that constrain the values that can be assigned to the n variables, and A is a set of agents for which the variables and constraints are distributed. The objective in solving a DisCSP is to allow the agents in A to develop a consistent distributed solution by means of message passing. In this paper, we present an evolutionary society of hill-climbers (ESoHC) that outperforms a previously developed algorithm for solving randomly generated DisCSPs that are composed of asymmetric constraints on a test suite of 2,800 distributed asymmetric constraint satisfaction problems.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
Buying options
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Learn about institutional subscriptionsPreview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Bejar, R., Krishnamachari, B., Gomes, C., and Selman, B. (2001). “Distributed Constraint Satisfaction in a Wireless Sensor Tracking System”, Proc. of the IJCAI Workshop on Distributed Constraint Reasoning, pp. 81–90.
Calisti, M., and Faltings, B. (2000). “Agent-Based Negotiations for Multi-Provider Interactions”, Proc. of the Intl. Sym. on Agent Sys. and Applications, pp. 235–248.
Calisti, M., and Faltings, B. (2000). “Distributed Constrained Agents for Allocating Service Demands in Multi-Provider Networks”, Journal of the Italian Operational Society, Special Issue on Constraint Problem Solving, vol. XXIX, no. 91.
Dozier, G. and Rupela, V. (2002). “Solving Distributed Asymmetric CSPs via a Society of Hill-Climbers”, Proc. of IC-AI’02, pp. 949–953, CSREA Press.
Freuder, E. C., Minca, M., and Wallace, R. J. (2001). “Privacy/Efficiency Tradeoffs in Distributed Meeting Scheduling by Constraint-Based Agents”, Proc. of the IJCAI Workshop on Distributed Constraint Reasoning, pp. 63–71.
Krishnamachari, B., Bejar, R., and Wicker, S. (2002). “Distributed Problem Solving and the Boundaries of Self-Configuration in Multi-hop Wireless Networks”, Proc. of the Hawaii Intl. Conference on System Sciences, HICSS-35.
MacIntyre, E., Prosser, P., Smith, B., and Walsh, T. (1998). “Random Constraint Satisfaction: Theory Meets Practice,” The Proc. of CP-98, pp. 325–339.
Mackworth, A. K. (1977). “Consistency in networks of relations”. Artificial Intelligence, 8(1), pp. 99–118.
Modi, P. J., Jung, H., Tambe, M., Shen, W.-M., and Kulkarni, S. (2001). “Dynamic Distributed Resource Allocation: A Distributed Constraint Satisfaction Approach” Proc. of the IJCAI Workshop on Distributed Constraint Reasoning, pp. 73–79.
Morris, P. (1993). “The Breakout Method for Escaping From Local Minima,” Proc. of AAAI’93, pp. 40–45.
Sebag, M. and Shoenauer, M. (1997). “A Society of Hill-Climbers,” The Proc. of ICEC-97, pp. 319–324, IEEE Press.
Silaghi, M.-C., Sam-Haroud, D., Calisti, M., and Faltings, B. (2001). “Generalized English Auctions by Relaxation in Dynamic Distributed CSPs with Private Constraints”, Proc. of the IJCAI Workshop on Distributed Constraint Reasoning, pp. 45–54.
Smith, B. (1994). “Phase Transition and the Mushy Region in Constraint Satisfaction Problems,” Proc. of ECAI-94, pp. 100–104, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
Solnon, C. (2002). “Ants can solve constraint satisfaction problems”, to appear in: IEEE Transactions on Evolutionary Computation, IEEE Press.
Tsang, E. (1993). Foundations of Constraint Satisfaction, Academic Press, Ltd.
Walrand, J. (1998). Communication Networks: A First Course, 2nd Edition, WCB/McGraw-Hill.
Yokoo, M. (2001). Distributed Constraint Satisfaction, Springer-Verlag.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2003 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg
About this paper
Cite this paper
Dozier, G. (2003). Solving Distributed Asymmetric Constraint Satisfaction Problems Using an Evolutionary Society of Hill-Climbers. In: Cantú-Paz, E., et al. Genetic and Evolutionary Computation — GECCO 2003. GECCO 2003. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 2723. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-45105-6_68
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-45105-6_68
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg
Print ISBN: 978-3-540-40602-0
Online ISBN: 978-3-540-45105-1
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive