Skip to main content

Learning about Constraints by Reflection

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNAI,volume 2056))

Abstract

A system's constraints characterizes what that system can do. However, a dynamic environment may require that a system alter its constraints. If feedback about a specific situation is available, a system may be able to adapt by reflecting on its own reasoning processes. Such reflection may be guided not only by explicit representation of the system's constraints but also by explicit representation of the functional role that those constraints play in the reasoning process. We present an operational computer program, Sirrine2 which uses functional models of a system to reason about traits such as system constraints. We further describe an experiment with Sirrine2 in the domain of meeting scheduling.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Lisa Dent, Jesus Boticario, Tom Mitchell, David Sabowski, and John McDermott. A personal learning apprentice. In William Swartout, editor, Proceedings of the 10th National Conference on Artificial Intelligence-AAAI-92, pages 96–103, San Jose, CA, July 1992. MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  2. R. E. Fikes and N. J. Nilsson. STRIPS: a new approach to the application of theorem proving to problem solving. Artificial Intelligence, 2(3-4):189–208, 1971.

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  3. Todd Grifth and J. William Murdock. The role of reflection in scientific exploration. In Proceedings of the Twentieth Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society, 1998.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Pattie Maes and Robyn Kozierok. Learning interface agents. In Proceedings of the 11th National Conference on Artificial Intelligence-AAAI-93, pages 459–464, Menlo Park, CA, USA, July 1993. AAAI Press.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Eleni Stroulia and Ashok K. Goel. A model-based approach to blame assignment: Revising the reasoning steps of problem solvers. In Proceedings of the National Conference on Artificial Intelligence-AAAI-96, Portland, Oregon, August 1996.

    Google Scholar 

  6. D. E. Wilkins. Can AI planners solve practical problems? Computational Intelligence, 6(4):232–246, 1990.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2001 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Murdock, J.W., Goel, A.K. (2001). Learning about Constraints by Reflection. In: Stroulia, E., Matwin, S. (eds) Advances in Artificial Intelligence. Canadian AI 2001. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 2056. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-45153-6_13

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-45153-6_13

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-42144-3

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-540-45153-2

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics