Abstract
Agents must decide, i.e., choose a preferred option from among a large set of alternatives, according to the precise context where they are immersed. Such a capability defines to what extent they are autonomous. But, there is no one way of deciding, and the classical mode of taking utility functions as the sole support is not adequate for situations constrained by qualitative features (such as wine selection, or putting together a football team). The BVG agent architecture relies on the use of values (multiple dimensions against which to evaluate a situation) to perform choice among a set of candidate goals. In this paper, we propose that values can also be used to guide the adoption of new goals from other agents. We argue that agents should base their rationalities on choice rather than search.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Luis Antunes and Helder Coelho. Redesigning the agents’ decision machinery. In Ana Paiva, editor, Affective Interactions, volume 1814 of Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence. Springer-Verlag, 2000. Revised and extended version of the paper presented in the Workshop on Affect in Interactions (Towards a new generation of interfaces), Siena, October 1999.
Luis Antunes, João Faria, and Helder Coelho. Autonomy through value-driven goal adoption. In Maria Carolina Monard and Jaime Simão Sichman, editors, International Joint Conference: 7th Iberoamerican Conference on Artificial Intelligence/15th Brazilian Conference on Artificial Intelligence (open discussion track proceedings). ICMC/USP, São Carlos, SP, Brasil, 2000.
Luis Antunes, João Faria, and Helder Coelho. Improving choice mechanisms within the BVG architecture. In Yves Lésperance and Cristiano Castelfranchi, editors, Intelligent Agents VII, Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence. Springer-Verlag, 2000. Proceedings of ICMAS 2000 workshop (ATAL), to appear.
M. J. Bayarri and M. H. DeGroot. Gaining weight: A bayesian approach. In J. M. Bernardo, M. H. DeGroot, D. V. D. V. Lindley, and A. F. M. Smith, editors, Bayesian Statistics 3. Oxford University Press, 1988.
A. Bechara, H. Damasio, D. Tranel, and A. R. Damasio. Deciding advantageously before knowing the advantageous strategy. Science, 275, 1997. February, 28.
Michael E. Bratman. What is intention? In Philip R. Cohen, Jerry L. Morgan, and Martha E. Pollack, editors, Intentions in Communication, pages 15–32. The MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, 1990.
Michael E. Bratman, David J. Israel, and Martha E. Pollack. Plans and resourcebounded practical reasoning. Computational Intelligence, 4:349–355, 1988.
Cristiano Castelfranchi. Guarantees for autonomy in cognitive agent architecture. In Michael Wooldridge and Nick Jennings, editors, Intelligent Agents: agent theories, architectures, and languages, volume 890 of Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence. Springer-Verlag, 1995. Proceedings of ECAI’94 workshop (ATAL).
Simon French. Decision Theory: An Introduction to the Mathematics of Rationality. Ellis Horwood Limited, Chichester, England, 1986.
Ralph L. Keeney and Howard Raiffa. Decisions with Multiple Objectives: Preference and Value Tradeoffs. John Wiley and Sons, 1976.
A. Monk. Cyclic interaction: a unitary approach to intention, action and the environment. Cognition, 68, 1998.
Martha Pollack and Marc Ringuette. Introducing the Tileworld: experimentally evaluating agent architectures. In Thomas Dietterich and William Swartout, editors, Proceedings of AAAI’90. AAAI Press, Menlo Park, CA, 1990.
Anand S. Rao and Michael P. Georgeff. Modeling agents within a BDI-architecture. In R. Fikes and E. Sandewall, editors, Proceedings of the 2nd International Conference on Principles of Knowledge Representation and Reasoning (KR’91), pages 473–484, Cambridge, Mass., 1991. Morgan Kaufmann publishers Inc.: San Mateo, CA, USA.
Robert A. Wilson and Frank C. Keil, editors. The MIT Encyclopedia of the Cognitive Sciences. The MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, 1999. second printing.
Michael Wooldridge. Reasoning about rational agents. The MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, 2000.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2001 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg
About this paper
Cite this paper
Antunes, L., Faria, J., Coelho, H. (2001). Choice: The Key for Autonomy. In: Brazdil, P., Jorge, A. (eds) Progress in Artificial Intelligence. EPIA 2001. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 2258. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-45329-6_17
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-45329-6_17
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg
Print ISBN: 978-3-540-43030-8
Online ISBN: 978-3-540-45329-1
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive