Skip to main content

Using Consensus Methods for Determining the Representation of Expert Informationin Distributed Systems

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNAI,volume 1904))

Abstract

By the expert information we mean the information given by a man-expert of a field of science and technology, or by some intelligent program (for example intelligent agents) in solving of some task. We assume that in an intelligent distributed system for the same task the system sites may generate different solutions, and the problem is for the management system to determine a proper one solution for the task. In this paper we propose solving above problem by determining consensus of given solutions and treat it as the final solution. We present a general consensus problem, the postulates for consensus choice and their analysis. This analysis shows that the final solution being the consensus of given solutions should be the most credible solution in the uncertain situation.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Arrow, K.J.: Social Choice and Individual Values. Wiley New York (1963).

    Google Scholar 

  2. Badache, N., Hurfin, M., Madeco, R.: Solving the Consensus Problem in a Mobile Environment. In: Proceedings of IEEE International Performance, Computing and Communications Conference. IEE Piscataway NJ (1999) 29–35.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Ceri, S., Pelagatti, G.: Distributed Databases, Principle and Systems. McGraw-Hill (1984).

    Google Scholar 

  4. Coulouris, G, Dollimore, J., Kindberg, T.: Distributed Systems, Concepts and Design. 3rd edn. Addison-Wesley (1994).

    Google Scholar 

  5. Danitowicz, C, Nguyen, N.T.: Determining of the Problem Solutions Representations. In: Plander I. (ed.): Artificial Intelligence and Information-Control Systems of Robots-87. North-Holland (1987) 187–192.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Danitowicz, C, Nguyen, N.T.: Consensus-Based Partition in the Space of Ordered Partitions. Pattern Recognition 21 (1988) 269–273.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  7. Danitowicz, C, Nguyen, N.T.:Methods for Determining Representation of Experts’ Opinions in Classification Tasks. In: Bubnicki, Z., Grzech, A. (eds.):Knowledge Engineering and Expert Systems. Wroclaw University of Technology (1997) 279–287.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Danitowicz, C, Nguyen, N.T.: Consensus-Based Methods for Restoring Consistency of Replicated Data. In: Klopotek, M., Michalewicz, M., Wierzchoń, S.T. (eds.): Advances in Soft Computing. Physica-Verlag Heidedelberg New York (2000) 325–335.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Day, W.H.E.: Consensus Methods as Tools for Data Analysis. In: Bock, H.H. (ed.): Classification and Related Methods for Data Analysis. North-Holland (1988) 312–324.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Dyreson, C.E., Snodgrass, R.T.: Supporting valid-time indeterminacy. ACM Transaction on Database Systems 23 (1998) 1–57.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Ephrati, E., Rosenschein, J.S: Deriving Consensus in Multiagent Systems. Artificial Intelligence 87 (1998) 21–74.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  12. Fishburn, P.C.: Condorset Social Choice Functions. SIAM J. App. Math. 33 (1977) 469–489.

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  13. Hurfin, M., Mostefaoui, A., Raynal, M.: Consensus in Asynchronous Systems where Processes Can Crash and Recover. In: Proceedings of Seventeenth IEEE Symposium on Reliable Distributed Systems. IEEE Comput. Soc. Los Alamitos CA (1998) 280–286.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  14. Litvak, B.G.: Expert Information: Methods of Analysis and Gathering. Radio i Sviaz, Moscow (1982).

    Google Scholar 

  15. Nguyen, N.T.: The Axiom Approach to the Experts Opinions Representation Choice Problem. In: Bubnicki, Z. (ed.): Proceedings of the 13th International Conference on System Science. Wroclaw University of Technology (1998) 224–229.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Nguyen, N.T.: A Computer-Based Multiagent System for Building and Updating Models of Dynamic Populations Located in Distributed Environments. In: Kacki E. (ed.): Proceeding of 5th International Conference on Computer in Medicine. Lódź University of Technology (1999) 133–138.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Nguyen, N.T.: Using Consensus Methods for Determining Timestamps in Distributed Temporal Databases. Reports of Department of Information Systems, series: SPR, No. 26, Wroclaw University of Technology (2000).

    Google Scholar 

  18. Nguyen, N.T.: Consensus Methods for Resolving Conflict Situations in Distributed Information Systems. Reports of Department of Information Systems, series: SPR, No. 29, Wroclaw University of Technology (2000).

    Google Scholar 

  19. Ozsu, T.M.: Principles of Distributed Database Systems. Prentice-Hall (1991).

    Google Scholar 

  20. Pawlak, Z.: An Inquiry into Anatomy of Conflicts. Journal of Information Sciences 108 (1998) 65–78.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  21. Yan, K.Q., Wang, S.C., Chin, Y.H.: Consensus under Unreliable Transmission. Information Processing Letter 69 (1999) 243–248.

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2000 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Nguyen, N.T. (2000). Using Consensus Methods for Determining the Representation of Expert Informationin Distributed Systems. In: Artificial Intelligence: Methodology, Systems, and Applications. AIMSA 2000. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 1904. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-45331-8_2

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-45331-8_2

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-41044-7

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-540-45331-4

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics