Abstract
Model management is a framework for supporting meta-data related applications where models and mappings are manipulated as first class objects using operations such as Match, Merge, ApplyFunction, and Compose. To demonstrate the approach, we show how to use model management in two scenarios related to loading data warehouses. The case study illustrates the value of model management as a methodology for approaching meta-data related problems. It also helps clarify the required semantics of key operations. These detailed scenarios provide evidence that generic model management is useful and, very likely, implementable.
On leave from University of Leipzig (Germany), Institute of Computer Science.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Bernstein, P.A.: Panel: Is Generic Metadata Management Feasible? VLDB 2000
Bernstein, P.A., Levy, A., Pottinger, R.: A Vision for Management of Complex Models. MSR-TR-2000-53, http://www.research.microsoft.com/pubs, June 2000
Doan, AH., Domingos, P., Levy, A.: Learning Source Descriptions for Data Integration. Proc. WebDB 2000, pp81–92.
Jannink, J., Mitra, P., Neuhold, E., Pichai, S., Studer, R., Wiederhold, G.: An Algebra for Semantic Interoperation of Semistructured Data. Proc. 1999 IEEE Knowledge and Data Engineering Exchange Workshop (KDEX’99), Nov. 1999.
Li, W., Clifton, C.: Semantic Integration in Heterogeneous Databases using Neural Networks. Proc. VLDB94
Li, W., Clifton, C.: SEMINT: A Tool for Identifying Attribute Correspondences in Heterogeneous Databases Using Neural Network. Data and Knowledge Engineering, 33 (1), 2000
Miller, R., Ioannidis, Y.E., Ramakrishnan, R.: Schema Equivalence in Hetereogeneous Systems: Bridging Theory and Practice. Information Systems 19(1), 3–31, 1994
Milo, T., Zohar, S.: Using Schema Matching to Simplify Heterogeneous Data Translation. Proc. VLDB98
Mitra, P., Wiederhold, G., Jannink, J.: Semi-automatic Integration of Knowledge Sources. Proc. of Fusion’ 99, Sunnyvale, USA, July 1999
Mitra, P., Wiederhold, G., Kersten, M.: A Graph-Oriented Model for Articulation of Ontology Interdependencies; Proc. Extending DataBase Technologies, EDBT 2000, LNCS Springer Verlag.
Mylopoulos, J., Motschnig-Pitrik, R.: Partitioning Information Bases with Contexts. Proc.3rd CoopIS, Vienna, pp. 44–54, May 1995.
Palopoli, L., Sacca, D., Ursino, D.: Semi-automatic, semantic discovery of properties from database schemas. Proc. IDEAS, 1998.
Palopoli, L., Sacca, D., Ursino, D.: An automatic technique for detecting type conflicts in database schemas. Proc. CIKM, 1998
Shu, N.C., Housel, B.C., Taylor, R.W., Ghosh, S.P., Lum, V.Y.: EXPRESS: A Data EXtraction, Processing and REStructuring System. ACM TODS 2,2: 134–174, 1977.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2000 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg
About this paper
Cite this paper
Bernstein, P.A., Rahm, E. (2000). Data Warehouse Scenarios for Model Management. In: Laender, A.H.F., Liddle, S.W., Storey, V.C. (eds) Conceptual Modeling — ER 2000. ER 2000. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 1920. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-45393-8_1
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-45393-8_1
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg
Print ISBN: 978-3-540-41072-0
Online ISBN: 978-3-540-45393-2
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive