Skip to main content

Challenges of Integrating ASM and SSM IP Multicast Protocol Architectures

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Book cover Evolutionary Trends of the Internet (IWDC 2001)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNCS,volume 2170))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

The Source Specific Multicast (SSM) service model and protocol architecture have recently been proposedas an alternative to the currently deployed Any Source Multicast (ASM) service. SSM attempts to solve many of the deployment problems of ASM including protocol complexity, inter-domain scalability, and security weaknesses. However, the SSM protocol architecture is not radically different from that of ASM. This has createdopp ortunities for integrating it into the currently deployedASM infrastructure. In this paper, we first describe the ASM andSSM service models andasso ciatedproto col architectures, highlighting the relative merits andd emerits of each. We then examine the network infrastructure needed to support both of them. Our conclusion is that integration is relatively straightforwardin most cases; however there is one case—supporting ASM service over an SSM-only protocol architecture—for which it is difficult to design elegant solutions for an integratedSSM/ASM infrastructure.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. S. Deering, “Host extensions for IP multicasting.” Internet Engineering Task Force (IETF), RFC 1112, August 1989.

    Google Scholar 

  2. K. Almeroth, “The evolution of multicast: From the MBone to inter-domain multicast to Internet2 deployment,” IEEE Network, January/February 2000.

    Google Scholar 

  3. C. Diot, B. Lyles, B. Levine, and H. Kassem, “Requirements for the definition of new IP-multicast services,” IEEE Network, January/February 2000.

    Google Scholar 

  4. S. Bhattacharyya, C. Diot, L. Giuliano, R. Rockwell, J. Meylor, D. Meyer, G. Shepherd, and B. Haberman, “An overview of source-specific ip multicast(ssm) deployment.” Internet Engineering Task Force (IETF), http://draft-ietf-bhattach-ssm-*.txt, May 2001.

  5. H. Holbrook and B. Cain, “Source-specific multicast for IP.” Internet Engineering Task Force (IETF), http://draft-holbrook-ssm-arch-*.txt, March 2001.

  6. H. Holbrook and D. Cheriton, “IP multicast channels: EXPRESS support for largescale single-source applications,” in ACM Sigcomm, (Cambridge, Massachusetts, USA), August 1999.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Z. Albanna, K. Almeroth, D. Meyer, and M. Schipper, “IANA guidelines for IPv4 multicast address assignments.” Internet Engineering Task Force (IETF), http://draftietf-mboned-iana-ipv4-mcast-guidelines-*.txt, April 2001.

  8. B. Haberman and D. Thaler, “Unicast-prefix-basedIPv6 multicast addresses.” Internet Engineering Task Force (IETF), http://draft-ietf-ipngwg-uni-based-mcast-*.txt, January 2001.

  9. R. Vida, L. Costa, S. Fdida, S. Deering, B. Fenner, I. Kouvelas, and B. Haberman, “Multicast listener discovery version 2 (MLDv2) for ipv6.” Internet Engineering Task Force (IETF), draft-vida-mld-v2-*.txt, February 2001.

    Google Scholar 

  10. W. Fenner, “Internet group management protocol, version 2.” Internet Engineering Task Force (IETF), RFC 2236, November 1997.

    Google Scholar 

  11. S. Deering, B. Fenner, and B. Haberman, “Multicast listener discovery (MLD) for IPv6.” Internet Engineering Task Force (IETF), RFC 2710, October 1999.

    Google Scholar 

  12. S. Deering, D. Estrin, D. Farinacci, V. Jacobson, G. Liu, and L. Wei, “PIM architecture for wide-area multicast routing,” IEEE/ACM Transactions on Networking, pp. 153–162, Apr 1996.

    Google Scholar 

  13. D. Estrin, D. Farinacci, A. Helmy, D. Thaler, S. Deering, M. Handley, V. Jacobson, C. Liu, P. Sharma, and L. Wei, “Protocol independent multicast sparse-mode (PIM-SM): Protocol specification.” Internet Engineering Task Force (IETF), RFC 2362, June 1998.

    Google Scholar 

  14. B. Fenner, M. Handley, H. Holbrook, and I. Kouvelas, “Protocol independent multicast-sparse mode (PIM-SM): Protocol specification (revised).” Internet Engineering Task Force (IETF), http://draft-ietf-pim-sm-v2-new-*.txt, March 2001.

  15. S. Deering, D. Estrin, D. Farinacci, V. Jacobson, A. Helmy, D. Meyer, and L. Wei, “Protocol independent multicast version 2 dense mode specification.” Internet Engineering Task Force (IETF), draft-ietf-pim-v2-dm-*.txt, June 1999.

    Google Scholar 

  16. D. Meyer and B. Fenner, “Multicast source discovery protocol (MSDP).” Internet Engineering Task Force (IETF), draft-mboned-msdp-spec-*.txt, May 2001.

    Google Scholar 

  17. D. Meyer and P. Lothberg, “GLOP addressing in 233/8.” Internet Engineering Task Force (IETF), RFC 2770, February 2000.

    Google Scholar 

  18. M. Handley, D. Thaler, and D. Estrin, “The internet multicast address allocation architecture.” Internet Engineering Task Force (IETF), draft-ietf-malloc-arch-*.txt, December 1997.

    Google Scholar 

  19. B. Fenner, H. Holbrook, and I. Kouvelas, “Multicast source notification of interest protocol (msnip).” Internet Engineering Task Force (IETF), http://draft-ietf-idmr-msnip-*.txt, February 2001.

  20. D. Thaler, B. Fenner, and B. Quinn, “Socket interface extensions for multicast source filters.” Internet Engineering Task Force (IETF), draft-ietf-idmr-msf-api-*.txt, June 2000.

    Google Scholar 

  21. B. Cain, S. Deering, B. Fenner, I. Kouvelas, and A. Thyagarajan, “Internet group management protocol, version 3.” Internet Engineering Task Force (IETF), draftietf-idmr-igmp-v3-*.txt, March 2001.

    Google Scholar 

  22. H. Holbrook and B. Cain, “Using IGMPv3 for source-specific multicast.” Internet Engineering Task Force (IETF), draft-holbrook-idmr-igmpv3-ssm-*.txt, March 2000.

    Google Scholar 

  23. K. Sarac and K. Almeroth, “Monitoring reachability in the global multicast infrastructure,” in International Conference on Network Protocols (ICNP), (Osaka, JAPAN), November 2000.

    Google Scholar 

  24. P. Rajvaidya and K. Almeroth, “A router-basedtec hnique for monitoring the nextgeneration of internet multicast protocols,” in International Conference on Parallel Processing, (Valencia, Spain), September 2001.

    Google Scholar 

  25. G. Shepherd, E. Luczycki, and R. Rockell, “Source-specific protocol independent multicast in 232/8.” Internet Engineering Task Force (IETF), draft-ietf-mbonedssm232-*. txt, April 2001.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2001 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Almeroth, K.C., Bhattacharyya, S., Diot, C. (2001). Challenges of Integrating ASM and SSM IP Multicast Protocol Architectures. In: Palazzo, S. (eds) Evolutionary Trends of the Internet. IWDC 2001. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 2170. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-45400-4_23

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-45400-4_23

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-42592-2

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-540-45400-7

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics