Abstract
Memory representations of spatial information require the choice of one or more reference systems to specify spatial relations. In two experiments we investigated the role of different reference systems for the encoding of spatial information in human memory. In Experiment 1, participants had to reproduce the location of a previously seen dot in relation to two landmarks on a computer screen. The placement of the two landmarks was varied so that they were horizontally or vertically aligned in half of the trials, and diagonally aligned in the other half of the trials. Reproductions showed a similar pattern of distortions for all four different orientations of the landmarks, indicating the use of the landmarks as an allocentric reference system. In Experiment 2, the influence of this allocentric reference system for very brief retention intervals (100 and 400 ms) was demonstrated in a visual discrimination task, extending previous work. The results suggest that landmark-based spatial reference systems are functional within 100 ms of stimulus presentation for most of the observers. Allocentric reference sytems therefore are an essential part even of early mental representations of spatial information.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
Buying options
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Learn about institutional subscriptionsPreview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Agresti, A. (1996). An introduction to categorical data analysis. New York: Wiley.
Berthoz, A. (1991). Reference frames for the perception and control of movement. In J. Paillard (Ed.), Brain andspace (pp. 81–111). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Carlson-Radvansky, L.A. & Jiang, Y. (1998). Inhibition accompanies reference-frame selection. Psychological Science, 9, 386–391. 183
Francis, G. (1997). Cortical dynamics of lateral inhibition: Metacontrast masking. Psychological Review, 104, 572–594.
Francis, G. & Grossberg, S. (1994). Cortical dynamics of form and motion integration: Persistence, apparent motion, and illusory contours. Vision Research, 36, 149–173.
Freyd, J. J. & Johnson, J. Q. (1987). Probing the time course of representational momentum. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 13, 259–268.
Huttenlocher, J., Newcombe, N., & Sandberg, E. H. (1994). The coding of spatial location in young children. Cognitive Psychology, 27, 115–147.
Huttenlocher, J., Hedges, L.V., & Duncan, S. (1991). Categories and particulars: Prototype effects in estimating spatial location. Psychological Review, 98, 352–376.
Klatzky, R.L. (1998). Allocentric and egocentric spatial representation: Definitions, distinctions, and interconnections. In K.-F. Wender, C. Freksa & C. Habel (Eds.), Spatial cognition. An interdisciplinary approach to representing and processing spatial knowledge (pp. 107–127). Berlin: Springer.
Laeng, B., Peters, M., & McCabe, B. (1998). Memory for locations within regions: Spatial biases and visual hemifield differences. Memory & Cognition, 26, 97–107.
Levelt, W.J.M. (1996). Perspective taking and ellipsis in spatial descriptions. In P. Bloom, M.A. Peterson, L. Nadel, & M. Garrett (Eds.), Language and Space (pp. 77–107). Cambridge. MIT-Press.
Levinson, S. (1996). Frames of reference and Molyneux’s questions: Cross-linguistic evidence. In P. Bloom, M.A. Peterson, L. Nadel, & M. Garrett (Eds.), Language and space (pp. 109–169). Cambridge,MA: MIT Press.
Nelson, T.O. & Chaiklin, S. (1980). Immediate memory for spatial location. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Learning and Memory, 6, 529–545.
Pederson, E. (1993). Geographic and manipulable space in two Tamil linguistic systems. In A.U. Frank & I. Campari (Eds.), Spatial information theory (pp. 294–311). Berlin: Springer.
Presson, C.C. & Hazelrigg, M.D. (1984). Building spatial representations through primary and secondary learning. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 10, 716–722.
Roskos-Ewoldsen, B., McNamara, T.P., Shelton, A.L., & Carr, W.S. (1998). Mental representations of large and small spatial layouts are orientation-dependent. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 24, 215–26.
Shelton, A.L. & McNamara, T.P. (1997). Multiple views of spatial memory. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 4, 102–106.
Sholl, M.J. (1987). Cognitive maps as orienting schemata. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 13, 615–628.
Soechting, J.F. & Flanders, M. (1992). Moving in three-dimensional space: Frames of reference, vectors, and coordinate systems. Annual Review of Neuroscience, 15, 167–191.
Werner, S. (in preparation). The effect of egocentric and allocentric frames of reference on the mental representation of extrapersonal space.
Werner, S. & Diedrichsen, J. (submitted). The time course of spatial memory distortions.
Werner, S. & Schmidt, K. (in press). Environmental reference systems for large-scale spaces. Spatial Cognition and Computation.
Werner, S., Saade, C., & Lüer, G. (1998). Relations between the mental representation of extrapersonal space and spatial behavior. In K.-F. Wender, C. Freksa & C. Habel (Eds.), Spatial cognition. An interdisciplinary approach to representing and processing spatial knowledge (pp. 107–127). Berlin: Springer.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2000 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Werner, S., Schmidt, T. (2000). Investigating Spatial Reference Systems through Distortions in Visual Memory. In: Freksa, C., Habel, C., Brauer, W., Wender, K.F. (eds) Spatial Cognition II. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 1849. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-45460-8_13
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-45460-8_13
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg
Print ISBN: 978-3-540-67584-6
Online ISBN: 978-3-540-45460-1
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive