Skip to main content

The Complexity of the Matching-Cut Problem

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNCS,volume 2204))

Abstract

Finding a cut or finding a matching in a graph are so simple problems that they are hardly considered problems at all. In this paper, by means of a reduction from the NAE3SAT problem, we prove that combining these two problems together, i.e., finding a cut whose split edges are a matching is an NP-complete problem. It remains intractable even if we impose the graph to be simple (no multiple edges allowed) or its maximum degree to be k, with k ≽ 4. On the contrary, we give a linear time algorithm that computes a matching-cut of a series-parallel graph. It’s open whether the problem is tractable or not for planar graphs.

Research supported in part by the Murst Project: “Algorithms for Large Data Sets”.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. V. Chvátal. Recogniziong decomposable graphs. J. Graph Theory, 8:51–53, 1984.

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  2. G. Di Battista, P. Eades, R. Tamassia, and I. G. Tollis. Graph Drawing. Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River, NJ, 1999.

    Book  MATH  Google Scholar 

  3. G. Di Battista, M. Patrignani, and F. Vargiu. A Split&Push approach to 3D orthogonal drawing. Journ. Graph Alg. Appl., 4:105–133, 2000.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  4. M. R. Garey and D. S. Johnson. Computers and Intractability: A Guide to the Theory of NP-Completeness. W. H. Freeman, New York, NY, 1979.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  5. M. X. Goemans and D. P. Williamson. Improved approximation algorithms for maximum cut and satisfiability problems using semidefinite programming. J. ACM, 42:1115–1145, 1995.

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  6. M. Patrignani and F. Vargiu. 3DCube: A tool for three dimensional graph drawing. In G. Di Battista, editor, Graph Drawing (Proc. GD’ 97) volume 1353 of Lecture Notes Comput. Sci., pages 284–290. Springer-Verlag, 1997.

    Google Scholar 

  7. T. J. Schaefer. The complexity of satisfiability problems. In Proc. 10th Annu. ACM Sympos. Theory Comput., pages 216–226, 1978.

    Google Scholar 

  8. J. Valdes, R. E. Tarjan, and E. L. Lawler. The recognition of series-parallel digraphs. SIAM J. Comput., 11(2):298–313, 1982.

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2001 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Patrignani, M., Pizzonia, M. (2001). The Complexity of the Matching-Cut Problem. In: Brandstädt, A., Le, V.B. (eds) Graph-Theoretic Concepts in Computer Science. WG 2001. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 2204. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-45477-2_26

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-45477-2_26

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-42707-0

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-540-45477-9

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics