Skip to main content

Existential Concept Graphs of Power Context Families

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNAI,volume 2393))

Abstract

The aim of this paper is to show how existential concept graphs may be introduced on the semantic level. For this the “free extension” of a power context family \( \mathbb{K} \) by a given set X of variables is constructed as a power context family “freely” enlarged by X. Then, an existential concept graph of \( \mathbb{K} \) can be appropriately defined as a concept graph of the free extension of \( \mathbb{K} \) that can be projected onto a concept graph of \( \mathbb{K} \) by some mapping induced by an interpretation of the variables of X by basic objects of \( \mathbb{K} \) . The introduced conceptual content of existential concept graphs allows a simple description of the generalization order between those graphs. All this can be generalized to existential protoconcept graphs for also including negations. In this way, the actual development of Contextual Judgment Logic disposes of (implicit) existential quantifiers as well as negations and negating inversions (cf. [Wi01a]).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. R. B. Brandom: Making it explicit. Reasoning, representing, and discursive commitment. Havard University Press, Cambridge 1994.

    Google Scholar 

  2. R. W. Burch: A Peircean reduction thesis. Texas Tech University Press, Lubbock 1991.

    Google Scholar 

  3. F. Dau: Negations in simple concept graphs. In: B. Ganter, G. W. Mineau (eds.): Conceptual structures: logical, linguistic, and computational issues. LNAI 1867. Springer, Heidelberg 2000, 263–276.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  4. F. Dau: Concept graphs and predicate logic. In: H. Delugach, G. Stumme (eds.): Conceptual structures: broadening the base. LNAI 2120. Springer, Heidelberg 2001, 72–86.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  5. F. Dau, R. Wille: On the modal understanding of triadic contexts. In: R. Decker, W. Gaul (eds.): Classification and information processing at the turn of the millennium. Spinger, Heidelberg 2000, 83–94.

    Google Scholar 

  6. J. Klinger: Semiconcept graphs: syntax and semantics. Diplomarbeit. FB Mathematik, TU Darmstadt 2001.

    Google Scholar 

  7. B. Ganter, R. Wille: Formal Concept Analysis: mathematical foundations. Springer, Heidelberg 1999; German version: Springer, Heidelberg 1996.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  8. B. Groh, R. Wille: Lattices of triadic concept graphs. In: B. Ganter, G. W. Mineau (eds.): Conceptual structures: logical, linguistic and computational issues. LNAI 1867. Springer, Heidelberg 2000, 332–341.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  9. M. Nicholson: The pocket Aussie fact book. Penguin Books Australia, Ringwood 1999.

    Google Scholar 

  10. S. Prediger: Kontextuelle Urteilslogik mit Begriffsgraphen. Ein Beitrag zur Restrukturierung der mathematischen Logik. Dissertation, TU Darmstadt 1998. Shaker, Aachen 1998.

    Google Scholar 

  11. S. Prediger, R. Wille: The lattice of concept graphs of a relationally scaled context. In: W. Tepfenhart, W. Cyre (eds.): Conceptual structures: standards and practices. LNAI 1640. Springer, Heidelberg 1999, 401–414.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  12. J. F. Sowa: Conceptual structures: information processing in mind and machine. Adison-Wesley, Reading 1984.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  13. J. Tappe: Simple concept graphs with universal quantifiers. In: G. Stumme (ed.): Working with Conceptual Structures. Contributions to ICCS 2000. Shaker, Aachen 2000, 95–108.

    Google Scholar 

  14. R. Wille: Restructuring lattice theory: an approach based on hierarchies of concepts. In: I. Rival (ed.): Ordered sets. Reidel, Dordrecht-Boston 1982, 445–470.

    Google Scholar 

  15. R. Wille: Restructuring mathematical logic: an approach based on Peirce’s pragmatism. In: A. Ursini, P. Agliano (eds.): Logic and Algebra. Marcel Dekker, New York 1996, 267–281.

    Google Scholar 

  16. R. Wille: Conceptual Graphs and Formal Concept Analysis. In: D. Lukose, H. Delugach, M. Keeler, L. Searle, J. F. Sowa (eds.): Conceptual structures: fulfilling Peirce’s dream. LNAI 1257. Springer, Heidelberg 1997, 290–303.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  17. R. Wille: Triadic concept graphs. In: M. L. Mugnier, M. Chein (eds.): Conceptual structures: theory, tools and applications. LNAI 1453. Springer, Heidelberg 1998, 194–208.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  18. R. Wille: Boolean Concept Logic. In: B. Ganter, G. W. Mineau (eds.): Conceptual structures: logical, linguistic, and computational issues. LNAI 1867. Springer, Heidelberg 2000, 317–331.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  19. R. Wille: Contextual Logic summary. In: G. Stumme (ed.): Working with Conceptual Structures. Contributions to ICCS 2000. Shaker, Aachen 2000, 265–276.

    Google Scholar 

  20. R. Wille: Lecture notes on contextual logic of relations. FB4-Preprint, TU Darmstadt 2000.

    Google Scholar 

  21. R. Wille: Boolean Judgment Logic. In: H. Delugach, G. Stumme (eds.): Conceptual structures: broadening the base. LNAI 2120. Springer, Heidelberg 2001, 115–128.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  22. R. Wille: The contextual-logic structure of distinctive judgments. FB4-Preprint Nr. 2160, TU Darmstadt 2001.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2002 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Wille, R. (2002). Existential Concept Graphs of Power Context Families. In: Priss, U., Corbett, D., Angelova, G. (eds) Conceptual Structures: Integration and Interfaces. ICCS 2002. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 2393. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-45483-7_29

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-45483-7_29

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-43901-1

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-540-45483-0

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics