Skip to main content

Algebraic State Machines

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Book cover Algebraic Methodology and Software Technology (AMAST 2000)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNCS,volume 1816))

Abstract

We introduce the concept of an algebraic state machine. This is a state transition machine all parts of that are described by algebraic and logical means. This way we base the description of state transition systems exclusively on the concept of algebraic specifications. Also the state of an algebraic state machine is represented by an algebra. In particular, we describe the state spaces of the state machine by algebraic techniques, and the state transitions by special axioms called transition rules. Then we show how known concepts from algebraic specifications can be used to provide a notion of parallel composition with asynchronous interaction for algebraic state machines. As example we introduce a notion of object-oriented component and show how algebraic state machines can formalize such components.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. M. Abadi, L. Lamport: Composing specifications. Digital Systems Research Center, SRC Report 66, October 1990.

    Google Scholar 

  2. D. Ancona, M. Cerioli, E. Zucca: A formal framework with late binding. In J.P. Finance (ed.): Fundamental Approaches to Software Engineering, FASE’ 99, Lecture Notes in Computer Science 1577, pages 30–44, Berlin: Springer, 1999.

    Google Scholar 

  3. E. Astesiano, H.-J. Kreowski, B. Krieg-Brückner (eds.): Algebraic Foundations of Systems Specifications. Berlin: Springer, 1999.

    Google Scholar 

  4. H. Baumeister: Relations as abstract datatypes: An institution to specify relations between algebras. In TAPSOFT’ 95, Lecture Notes in Computer Science 915, pages 756–771, Arhus, Denmark, May 1995. Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  5. H. Baumeister: Relations between Abstract Datatypes modeled as Abstract Datatypes, PhD thesis, Universität Saarbrücken, 1999.

    Google Scholar 

  6. E. Börger: Why use evolving algebras for hardware and software Engineering. In: M. Bartosek, J. Standek, J. Wiedermann (eds): SOFSEM’ 95, 22nd Seminar on Current Trends in Theory and Practice of Informatics. Lecture Notes of Computer Science 1012, pages, 235–271. Springer, Berlin, 1995.

    Google Scholar 

  7. W. Brauer: Automatentheorie, Teubner 1984.

    Google Scholar 

  8. M. Broy: Views of queues. Science of Computer Programming 11, pages 65–86, 1988.

    Google Scholar 

  9. M. Broy: Mathematics of software engineering. Invited talk at MPC 95. In: B. Möller (ed.): Mathematics of Program Construction, July 1995, Kloster Irsee, Lecture Notes of Computer Science 947, pages, 18–47. Springer, Berlin, 1995.

    Google Scholar 

  10. M. Broy: Mathematical system models as a basis of software engineering. J. van Leeuwen (ed.): Computer Science Today. Lecture Notes of Computer Science 1000, pages, 292–306. Springer, Berlin, 1995.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  11. M. Broy: The specification of system components by state transition diagrams. Technische Universität München, Institut für Informatik, TUM-I9729, Mai 1997.

    Google Scholar 

  12. M. Chandy, J. Misra: Parallel Program Design: A Foundation. Addison-Wesley, 1988.

    Google Scholar 

  13. P. Dauchy: Développement et exploitation d’une spécification algébrique du logiciel embarqué d’un métro. Thèse, Université de Paris-Sud, Orsay 1992.

    Google Scholar 

  14. C.C. Elgot: Monadic computation and iterative algebraic theories. Proc. Logic Colloquium 73, pages 175–230, Amsterdam: North-Holland, 1975.

    Google Scholar 

  15. H. Ganzinger: Denotational semantics for languages with modules. In: D. Björner (ed.): TC2 Working Conference of Formal Description of Programming Concepts II, pages, 3–21. Garmisch, 1982.

    Google Scholar 

  16. M.-C. Gaudel: Correctness Proof of Programming Language Translation, pages 25–43. 1982.

    Google Scholar 

  17. M.-C. Gaudel, C. Khoury, A. Zamulin: Dynamic systems with implicit state. In J.P. Finance (ed.): Fundamental Approaches to Software Engineering, FASE’ 99, Lecture Notes in Computer Science, pages, 114–128. Berlin: Springer, 1999.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Y. Gurevich: Evolving Algebra 1993: Lipari Guide. In: E. Börger (ed.): Specification and Validation Methods. Oxford University Press 1995.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Y. Gurevich: Abstract state machines. In T. Rus (ed.): AMAST 2000, Iowa City, 2000, this volume.

    Google Scholar 

  20. D. Harel: A visual formalism for complex systems. Science of Computer Programming 8, pages 231–274, 1987.

    Google Scholar 

  21. R. Hettler: Entity/Relationship-Datenmodellierung in axiomatischen Spezifikationssprachen. Dissertation, TU München. Reihe Softwaretechnik, Marburg: Tectum Verlag, 1995.

    Google Scholar 

  22. C. A. R. Hoare: An axiomatic basis for computer programming. Comm. ACM 12, pages 576–583, 1969.

    Google Scholar 

  23. L. Lamport: The temporal logic of actions. ACM Transactions on Programming Languages and Systems 16(3), pages 872–923, 1994.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. N. Lynch, E. Stark: A proof of the Kahn principle for input/output automata. Information and Computation 82, pages 81–92. 1989.

    Google Scholar 

  25. B. Meyer: Object-Oriented Software Construction. Prentice Hall International, 1988.

    Google Scholar 

  26. Rational: The Unified Modeling Language, Version 1.3, Rational Software Corporation, http://www.rational.com, 1999.

  27. M. Broy, C. Facchi, R. Hettler, H. Hußmann, D. Nazareth, F. Regensburger, O. Slotosch, K. Stølen: The Requirement and Design Specification Language SPectrum. An Informal Introduction. Version 1.0. Part I/II Technische Universität München, Institut für Informatik, TUM-I9311 / TUM-I9312, May 1993.

    Google Scholar 

  28. B. Selic, G. Gullekson, P.T. Ward: Real Time Object Oriented Modeling. Wiley & Sons, 1994.

    Google Scholar 

  29. B. Selic, J. Rumbaugh: Using UML for Modeling Complex Real-Time Systems. Rational Software Corporation & ObjecTime Ltd., 1998.

    Google Scholar 

  30. D. D’Souza, A.C. Wills: Objects, Components, Frameworks with UML: The Catalysis approach. Addison-Wesley,1998.

    Google Scholar 

  31. M. Wirsing: Algebraic Specification. Handbook of Theoretical Computer Science, Vol. B, pages 675–788, Amsterdam: North Holland, 1990.

    Google Scholar 

  32. J. Warmer, A. Kleppe: The Object Constraint Language: Precise Modeling with UML. Reading, Mass.: Addison-Wesley, 1999.

    Google Scholar 

  33. E. Astesiano, E. Zucca: D-oids: a model for dynamic data types. Mathematical Structures in Computer Science 5(2), pages 257–282, 1995.

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  34. CoFI Language Design Group: CASL-Summary (Version 1.0). http://www.brics.dk/Projects/CoFI/Documents/CASL/Summary, 1998.

  35. K. Lano: Formal Object-Oriented Development. London: Springer, 1995.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2000 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Broy, M., Wirsing, M. (2000). Algebraic State Machines. In: Rus, T. (eds) Algebraic Methodology and Software Technology. AMAST 2000. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 1816. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-45499-3_9

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-45499-3_9

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-67530-3

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-540-45499-1

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics