Skip to main content

Fences Are Futile: On Relaxations for the Linear Ordering Problem

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNCS,volume 2081))

Abstract

We study polyhedral relaxations for the linear ordering problem. The integrality gap for the standard linear programming relaxation is 2. Our main result is that the integrality gap remains 2 even when the standard relaxations are augmented with k-fence constraints for any k, and with k-Möbius ladder constraints for k up to 7; when augmented with k-Möbius ladder constraints for general k, the gap is at least 33/17 ≈ 1:94. Our proof is non-constructive—we obtain an extremal example via the probabilistic method. Finally, we show that no relaxation that is solvable in polynomial time can have an integrality gap less than 66/65 unless P=NP.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Alberto Caprara and Matteo Fischetti, 1/2-Chvatal-Gomory cuts, Mathematical Programming, 74A, 1996, 221–235.

    MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  2. P. Erdös and H. Sachs, Regulare Graphe gegebener Taillenweite mit minimaler Knotenzahl, Wiss. Z. Univ. Halle-Wittenberg, Math. Nat. 12, 1963, 251–258.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  3. M. X. Goemans and L. A. Hall, The Strongest Facets of the Acyclic Subgraph Polytope are Unknown, Proceedings of IPCO 1996, 415–429.

    Google Scholar 

  4. M. Grötschel, M. Jünger, and G. Reinelt, On the Maximum Acyclic Subgraph Polytope, Mathematical Programming, 33, 1985, 28–42.

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  5. M. Grötschel, M. Jünger, and G. Reinelt, Facets of the Linear Ordering Polytope, Mathematical Programming, 33, 1985, 43–60.

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  6. M. Grötschel, L. Lovász and A. Schrijver, Geometric Algorithms and Combinatorial Optimization, Springer-Verlag, New York, 1988.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  7. Johan Håstad, Some Optimal Inapproximability Results, Proceedings of STOC, 1997.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Richard M. Karp, Reducibility Among Combinatorial Problems, Complexity of Computer Computations, Plenum Press, 1972.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Rudolf Mueller, On the Partial Order Polytope of a Digraph, Mathematical Programming, 73, 1996, 31–49.

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  10. Alantha Newman, Approximating the Maximum Acyclic Subgraph, M.S. Thesis, MIT, June 2000.

    Google Scholar 

  11. S. Poljak, Polyhedral and Eigenvalue Approximations of the Max-Cut Problem, Sets, Graphs and Numbers, Colloq. Math. Soc. Janos Bolyai 60, 1992, 569–581.

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  12. Andreas Schulz and Rudolf Mueller, The Interval Order Polytope of a Digraph, Proceedings of IPCO 1995, 50–64.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2001 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Newman, A., Vempala, S. (2001). Fences Are Futile: On Relaxations for the Linear Ordering Problem. In: Aardal, K., Gerards, B. (eds) Integer Programming and Combinatorial Optimization. IPCO 2001. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 2081. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-45535-3_26

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-45535-3_26

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-42225-9

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-540-45535-6

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics