Skip to main content

Optimistic Priority Weights with an Interval Comparison Matrix

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Book cover New Frontiers in Artificial Intelligence (JSAI 2001)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNAI,volume 2253))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

AHP is proposed to give the importance grade with respect to many items. The comparison value is used to be crisp, however, it is easy for a decision maker to give it as an interval. The interval comparison values can reflect uncertainty due to human judgement. In this paper, the interval importance grade is obatained from an interval comparison matrix so as to include the decision maker’s judgement. To choose the crisp importance grades and the crisp efficinency in the decision maker’s judgement, we use DEA, which is an evaluation method from the optimistic viewpoint.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Saaty, T.L. (1980): The Analytic Hierarchy Process. McGraw-Hill

    Google Scholar 

  2. Sugihara, K., Maeda, Y. and Tanaka, H. (1999): Interval Evaluation by AHP with Rough Set Concept. New Directions in Rough Sets, Data Mining and Granular-Soft Computing, Lecture Note in Artificial Intelligence 1711, Springer. 375–381

    Google Scholar 

  3. Tanaka, H. and Guo, P. (1999): Possibilistic Data Analysis for Operation Research. Physica-Verlag, A Springer Verlag Company

    Google Scholar 

  4. Charnes, A. Cooper, W.W. and Rhodes, E. (1978): Measuring the Efficiency of Decision Making Units. European Journal of Operational Research, 429–444

    Google Scholar 

  5. Tone, K.(1993): Mesurement and Improvement of Efficiency by DEA. Nikkagiren (Japanese)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Ozawa, M. Yamaguchi, T. and Fukukawa, T. (1993): The Modified Assurance Region of DEA with Interval AHP. Communication of the Operations Reserch Society of Japan, 471–476 (Japanese)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2001 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Entani, T., Ichihashi, H., Tanaka, H. (2001). Optimistic Priority Weights with an Interval Comparison Matrix. In: Terano, T., Ohsawa, Y., Nishida, T., Namatame, A., Tsumoto, S., Washio, T. (eds) New Frontiers in Artificial Intelligence. JSAI 2001. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 2253. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-45548-5_43

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-45548-5_43

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-43070-4

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-540-45548-6

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics