Skip to main content

A Software Composition Language and Its Implementation

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNCS,volume 2244))

Abstract

The actually achieved benefits of using binary software components are not as revolutionary as promised. Component platforms are available but the composition process is not “componentized”. We propose to increase the automation of software composition along with the necessary degree of flexibilty by introducing a set of languages (CoPL and CoML) and tools. By automating the composition process routine tasks are performed by tools. Additionally, software engineers can preserve and instantiate composition patterns in CoPL and CoML and thus at a higher level of abstraction than at the level of pure glue code.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Szyperski Clemens: Component Software— Beyond Object-Oriented Programming. Addison-Wesley. 1997.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Sun Microsystems: JavaBeans API Specification. 1997. http://java.sun.com/beans/spec.html.

  3. Sun Microsystems: Enterprise JavaBeans(TM) 2.0 Specification. Proposed Final Draft 2. 2001. http://java.sun.com/products/ejb/.

  4. Object Management Group: The Common Object Request Broker: Architecture and Specification. Editorial Revision: CORBA 2.4.2. February 2001. http://www.omg.org/technology/documents/formal/corba_iiop.htm.

  5. Microsoft: The Component Object Model Specification. 1995. http://www.microsoft.com/com/resources/comdocs.asp

  6. Birngruber Dietrich, Hof Markus: Using Plans for Specifying Preconfigured Bean Sets. In: Li Qiaoyun, et. al. (Eds.): Proceedings of the 34th International Conference on Technology of Object-Oriented Languages and Systems (TOOLS 34). Santa Barbara, CA. 2000.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Richter Jeffrey:.NET Framework: Building, Packaging, Deploying, and Administering Applications and Types. in: MSDN magazine. February 2001.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Achermann Franz, Nierstrasz Oscar: Applications = Components + Scripts— A tour of Piccola. in: Mehmet Aksit (Ed.): Software Architectures and Component Technology. Kluwer. 2000.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Milne Philip, Walrath Kathy: Long-Term Persistence for JavaBeans. Sun Microsystems. 24. Nov. 1999.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Curbera Francisco, Weerawarana Sanjiva, Duftler Matthew J.: On Component Composition Languages. in: Bosch, Szyperski, Weck (Ed.): Proceedings of the Fifth International Workshop on Component-Oriented Programming (WCOP 2000). 2000. ISSN 1103-1581. see also http://www.alphaWorks.ibm.com/formula/bml.

  11. Czarnecki Krzysztof, Eisenecker Ulrich W.: Generative Programming. Methods, Tools, and Applications. Addison Wesley. 2000.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Kiczales Gregor, Lamping John, Mendhekar Anurag, Maeda Chris, Lopes Cristina V., Loingtier Jean-Marc, Irwin John: Aspect-Oriented Programming. in: Proceedings of the European Conference on Object-Oriented Programming (ECOOP). Finland. LNCS 1241. Springer. June 1997.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Jazayeri Mehdi, Loos Rüdiger G.K., Musser David R. (Eds.): Generic Programming. International Seminar on Generic Programming. Selected Papers. Dagstuhl Castle Germany. LNCS 1766. Springer. April/May 1998.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Donohoe Patrick (Ed.): Software Product Lines. Experience and Research Directions. Proceedings of the First Software Product Line Conference (SPLC1). Denver USA. Kluwer. August 2000.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Austern Mathew: Generic Programming and the STL. Addison Wesley. 1999.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Batory Don: Subjectivity and GenVoca Generators. in: Proceedings of the 4th International Conference on Software Reuse (ICSR 96). Orlando USA. IEEE. April1996.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Alexander Perry, Flener Pierre (Eds.): Proceedings of ASE-2000: The 15th IEEE Conference on Automated Software Engineering. Grenoble France. IEEE CS Press. September 2000.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2001 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Birngruber, D. (2001). A Software Composition Language and Its Implementation. In: Bjørner, D., Broy, M., Zamulin, A.V. (eds) Perspectives of System Informatics. PSI 2001. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 2244. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-45575-2_50

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-45575-2_50

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-43075-9

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-540-45575-2

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics