Skip to main content

Generating Tradeoffs for Interactive Constraint-Based Configuration

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Book cover Principles and Practice of Constraint Programming — CP 2001 (CP 2001)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNCS,volume 2239))

Abstract

In this paper we have modeled tradeoffs in constraint-based configuration as additional constraints,and begun to study the issues involved in generating and evaluating such tradeoffs. We describe our basic approach in the context of a “toy” configuration problem based on the classic N-Queens problem. Initial experiments compare “proposal strategies” for generating tradeoffs. We demonstrate that arc-consistency can be used as an efective trigger for generating tradeoff proposals in interactive configuration.

This work was performed while this author was at the University of New Hampshire.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. James Bowen.Using dependency records to generate design coordination advice in a constraint-based approach to Concurrent Engineering.Computers in Industry, 33(2–3):191–199,1997.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Alexander Felfernig, Gerhard Friedrich, Dietmar Jannach, and Markus Stumpter. Consistency-based diagnosis of configuration knowledge-bases. In Proceedings of the 14h European Conference on Artificial Intelligence,pages 146–150,2000.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Eugene C. Freuder,Chavalit Likitvivatanavong,and Richard J. Wallace. A case-study in explanation and implication. In In CP2000 Workshop on Analysis and Visualization of Constraint Programs and Solvers,2000.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Eugene C. Freuder and Barry O’sullivan. Generating tradeoffs for constraint-based configuration. In Working Notes of the CP-2001 Workshop on User-Interaction in Constraint Satisfaction,December 2001.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Daniel Sabin and Rainer Weigel. Product configuration frameworks-a survey. IEEE Intelligent Systems and their applications,13(4):42–49,July-August 1998. Special Issue on Configuration.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2001 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Freuder, E.C., O’Sullivan, B. (2001). Generating Tradeoffs for Interactive Constraint-Based Configuration. In: Walsh, T. (eds) Principles and Practice of Constraint Programming — CP 2001. CP 2001. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 2239. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-45578-7_45

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-45578-7_45

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-42863-3

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-540-45578-3

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics