Abstract
We investigate the concept of artificial societies and identify a number of separate classes of such societies. These are compared in terms of openness, flexibility, stability, and trustfulness. The two most obvious types of artificial societies are the open societies, where there are no restrictions for joining the society, and the closed societies, where it is impossible for an “external agent” to join the society. We argue that whereas open societies supports openness and flexibility, closed societies support stability and trustfulness. In many situations, however, there is a need for societies that support all these aspects, e.g., in systems characterized as information ecosystems. We therefore suggest two classes of societies that better balance the trade-off between these aspects. The first class is the semi-open societies, where any agent can join the society given that it follows some well-specified restrictions (or, at least, promises to do so), and second is the semi-closed societies, where anyone may have an agent but where the agents are of a predefined type.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
A. Artikis and J. Pitt. A Formal Model of Open Agent Societies, In Proceedings of the Fifth International Conference on Autonomous Agents, 2001.
K.M. Carley and L. Gasser. Computational Organization Theory. In G. Weiss (editor), Multiagent Systems, MIT Press, 1999.
P. Davidsson. Emergent Societies of Information Agents, In Cooperative Information Agents IV, Springer Verlag, LNCS 1860, 2000.
J. Ferber and O. Gutknecht. A Meta-model for the Analysis and Design of Organizations in Multi-Agent Systems. In Proceedings of the Third International Conference on Multi-Agent Systems, IEEE Computer Society, 1998.
R. Gustavsson and M. Fredriksson. Coordination and Control of Computational Ecosystems: A Vision of the Future. In: A. Omicini, M. Klusch, F. Zambonelli, and R. Tolksdorf, editors, Coordination of Internet Agents: Models, Technologies, and Applications. Springer Verlag, 2001.
S.J. Johansson and J. Kummeneje. A Preference-Driven Approach to Agent Systems. To appear in the Proceedings of the Second International Conference on Intelligent Agent Technologies, 2001.
V.R. Lesser. Reflections on the Nature of Multi-Agent Coordination and Its Implications for an Agent Architecture. Autonomous Agents and Multi-Agent Systems, Vol. 1: 89–111, Kluwer, 1998.
A. Oram (editor). Peer-to-Peer: Harnessing the Power of Disruptive Technologies, O’Reilly, 2001.
M.P. Singh, A.S. Rao, and M.P. Georgeff. Formal Models in DAI, In G. Weiss (editor), Multiagent Systems, MIT Press, 1999.
F. Zambonelli, N.R. Jennings, and M. Wooldridge. Organizational Abstractions for the Analysis and Design of Multi-Agent Systems. In P. Ciancarini and M. Wooldridge, editors, Agent-Oriented Software Engineering. Springer Verlag, LNCS 1957, 2001.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2001 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg
About this paper
Cite this paper
Davidsson, P. (2001). Categories of Artificial Societies. In: Omicini, A., Petta, P., Tolksdorf, R. (eds) Engineering Societies in the Agents World II. ESAW 2001. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 2203. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-45584-1_1
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-45584-1_1
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg
Print ISBN: 978-3-540-43091-9
Online ISBN: 978-3-540-45584-4
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive