Skip to main content

A Decidable Variant of Higher Order Matching

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Rewriting Techniques and Applications (RTA 2002)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNCS,volume 2378))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

A lambda term is k-duplicating if every occurrence of a lambda abstractor binds at most k variable occurrences. We prove that the problem of higher order matching where solutions are required to be k-duplicating (but with no constraints on the problem instance itself) is decidable. We also show that the problem of higher order matching in the affine lambda calculus (where both the problem instance and the solutions are constrained to be 1-duplicating) is in NP, generalizing de Groote’s result for the linear lambda calculus [4].

Supported by KBN grant 8T 11C 04319

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Hubert Comon, Yan Jurski, Higher-Order Matching and Tree Automata, Proc. 11th Int’l Workshop Computer Science Logic, CSL’97, Mogens Nielsen, Wolfgang Thomas, eds., Aarhus, Denmark, August 1997, LNCS 1414, Springer-Verlag, 1998, 157–176.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  2. Nachum Dershowitz, Zohar Manna, Proving termination with multiset orderings, Comm. Assoc. for Computing Machinery, 6(22), 465–476, 1979.

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  3. Giles Dowek, Third order matching is decidable, Proc. 7th IEEE Symp. Logic in Computer Science, LICS’92, IEEE Press, 1992, 2–10, also in Annals of Pure and Applied Logic, 69, 1994, 135–155.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Philippe de Groote, Linear Higher-Order Matching Is NP-Complete, Proc. 11th Int’l Conf. Rewriting Techniques and Applications, RTA 2000, Leo Bachmair, ed., Norwich, UK, July 10–12, 2000, LNCS 1833, Springer-Verlag, 2000, 127–140.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  5. Jordi Levy, Linear Second Order Unification, Proc. 7th Int’l Conf. Rewriting Techniques and Applications, RTA’96, H. Ganzinger, ed., New Brunswick, NJ, 1996, LNCS 1103, Springer-Verlag, 1996, 332–346.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Ralph Loader, Higher Order β Matching is Undecidable, October 2001, manuscript.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Harry G. Mairson, A Simple Proof of a Theorem of Statman, Theoretical Computer Science, 103, 1992, 213–226.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  8. Vincent Padovani, Decidability of All Minimal Models, Proc. 3rd Int’l Workshop Types for Proofs and Programs, TYPES’95, Stefano Berardi, Mario Coppo, eds., Torino, Italy, 1995, LNCS 1158, Springer-Verlag, 1996, 201–215.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Vincent Padovani, On equivalence classes of interpolation equations, Proc.Int’l Conf. Typed Lambda Calculi and Applications, TLCA’95, M. Dezani-Ciancaglini, G. Plotkin, eds., LNCS 902, Springer-Verlag, 1995, 335–349.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  10. Vincent Padovani, Decidability of fourth-order matching, Mathematical Structures in Computer Science, 3(10), 2000, 361–372.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  11. Manfred Schmidt-Schauß, Klaus U. Schulz, Decidability of bounded higher order unification, technical report Frank-report-15, Institut für Informatik, J. W. Goethe-Universität, Frankfurt am Main, 2001.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Aleksy Schubert, Linear interpolation for the higher order matching problem, Proc. 7th Int’l Joint Conf. Theory and Practice of Software Development, TAP-SOFT’97, M. Bidoit, M. Dauchet, eds., LNCS 1214, Springer-Verlag, 1997.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  13. Richard Statman, The Typed λ-Calculus is Not Elementary Recursive, Theoretical Computer Science, 15, 1981, 73–81.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  14. Sergei Vorobyov, The “Hardest” Natural Decidable Theory, Proc. 12th Annual IEEE Symp. Logic in Computer Science, LICS’97, IEEE Press, 1997, 294–305.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2002 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Dougherty, D., Wierzbicki, T. (2002). A Decidable Variant of Higher Order Matching. In: Tison, S. (eds) Rewriting Techniques and Applications. RTA 2002. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 2378. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-45610-4_24

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-45610-4_24

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-43916-5

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-540-45610-0

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics