Skip to main content

Tableaux for Quantified Hybrid Logic

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Book cover Automated Reasoning with Analytic Tableaux and Related Methods (TABLEAUX 2002)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNAI,volume 2381))

Abstract

We present a (sound and complete) tableau calculus for Quantified Hybrid Logic (QHL). QHL is an extension of orthodox quantified modal logic: as well as the usual □ and ◊ modalities it contains names for (and variables over) states, operators @s for asserting that a formula holds at a named state, and a binder ↓ that binds a variable to the current state. The first-order component contains equality and rigid and non-rigid designators. As far as we are aware, ours is the first tableau system for QHL.

Completeness is established via a variant of the standard translation to first-order logic. More concretely, a valid QHL-sentence is translated into a valid first-order sentence in the correspondence language. As it is valid, there exists a first-order tableau proof for it. This tableau proof is then converted into a QHL tableau proof for the original sentence. In this way we recycle a well-known result (completeness of first-order logic) instead of a well-known proof.

The tableau calculus is highly flexible. We only present it for the constant domain semantics, but slight changes render it complete for varying, expanding or contracting domains. Moreover, completeness with respect to specific frame classes can be obtained simply by adding extra rules or axioms (this can be done for every first-order definable class of frames which is closed under and reflects generated subframes).

This research was supported by the Netherlands Organization for Scientific Research (NWO, grants# 612.000.106 and 612.062.001). This work was carried out as part of the INRIA funded partnership between LIT (Language and Inference Technology, ILLC, University of Amsterdam) and LED (Langue et Dialogue, LORIA, Nancy).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. C. Areces, P. Blackburn, and M. Marx. Hybrid logics: Characterization, interpolation and complexity. Journal of Symbolic Logic, 66(3):977–1010, 2001.

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  2. C. Areces, P. Blackburn, and M. Marx. Repairing the interpolation lemma in quantified modal logic. Report PP-2001-19, ILLC. To appear in Annals of Pure and Applied Logic.

    Google Scholar 

  3. K. Fine. Failures of the interpolation lemma in quantified modal logic. Journal of Symbolic Logic, 44(2):201–206, 1979.

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  4. M. Fitting. First Order Logic and Automated Theorem Proving (second edition). Springer Verlag, 1996.

    Google Scholar 

  5. M. Fitting. Types, Tableaus, and Gödel’s God. Unpublished Draft, 1999.

    Google Scholar 

  6. M. Fitting and R. Mendelsohn. First-Order Modal Logic. Kluwer, 1998.

    Google Scholar 

  7. D. Gabbay. Labelled Deductive Systems. Oxford University Press, 1996.

    Google Scholar 

  8. R. Goré. Tableau methods for modal and temporal logics. In M D’Agostino,et al editors, Handbook of Tableau Methods, pages 297–396. Kluwer Academic Publishers, 1999.

    Google Scholar 

  9. John McCarthy and Patrick J. Hayes. Some philosophical problems from the standpoint of artificial intelligence. In B. Meltzer and D. Michie, editors, Machine Intelligence 4, pages 463–502. Edinburgh University Press, 1969.

    Google Scholar 

  10. J. Seligman. Internalization: The case of hybrid logic. Journal of Logic and Computation, 11(5):671–689, 2001.

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  11. R. Smullyan. First Order Logic. Springer-Verlag, 1968.

    Google Scholar 

  12. J. van Benthem. Modal Logic and Classical Logic. Bibliopolis, Naples, 1983.

    Google Scholar 

  13. J. van Benthem. Correspondence theory. In D.M. Gabbay and F. Guenther, editors, Handbook of Philosophical Logic, volume 2, pages 167–248. Reidel, Dordrecht, 1984.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2002 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Blackburn, P., Marx, M. (2002). Tableaux for Quantified Hybrid Logic. In: Egly, U., Fermüller, C.G. (eds) Automated Reasoning with Analytic Tableaux and Related Methods. TABLEAUX 2002. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 2381. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-45616-3_4

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-45616-3_4

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-43929-5

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-540-45616-2

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics