Skip to main content

Testing Satisfiability of CNF Formulas by Computing a Stable Set of Points

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNAI,volume 2392))

Abstract

We show that a conjunctive normal form (CNF) formula F is unsatisfiable iff there is a set of points of the Boolean space that is stable with respect to F. So testing the satisfiability of a CNF formula reduces to looking for a stable set of points (SSP). We give some properties of SSPs and describe a simple algorithm for constructing an SSP for a CNF formula. Building an SSP can be viewed as a “natural” way of search space traversal. This naturalness of search space examination allows one to make use of the regularity of CNF formulas to be checked for satisfiability. We illustrate this point by showing that if a CNF F formula is symmetric with respect to a group of permutations, it is very easy to make use of this symmetry when constructing an SSP. As an example, we show that the unsatisfiability of pigeon-hole CNF formulas can be proven by examining only a set of points whose size is quadratic in the number of holes.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. C.A. Brown, L. Finkelstein, P.W. Purdom. Backtrack searching in the presence of symmetry. In “Applied algebra, algebraic algorithms and error correcting codes”. Sixth international conference, P. 99–110. Springer-Verlag, 1988.

    Google Scholar 

  2. V. Chvatal, E. Szmeredi. Many hard examples for resolution. J. of the ACM,vol. 35, No 4, pp. 759–568.

    Google Scholar 

  3. W. Cook, C.R. Coullard, G. Turan. On the complexity of cutting planes proofs. Discrete Applied Mathematics, 18, 1987, 25–38.

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  4. J. Crawford, M. Ginsberg, E. Luks, A. Roy. Symmetry breaking predicates for search problems. Fifth International Conference on Principles of Knowledge Representation and Reasoning (KR’96).

    Google Scholar 

  5. M. Davis, G. Logemann, D. Loveland. A Machine program for theorem proving. Communications of the ACM.-1962.-V. 5.-P. 394–397.

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  6. E. Goldberg. Proving unsatisfiability of CNFs locally. Proceedings of LICS 2001 Workshop on Theory and Applications of Satisfiability Testing.

    Google Scholar 

  7. A. Haken. The intractability of resolution. Theor. Comput. Sci. 39 (1985), 297–308.

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  8. B. Krishnamurthy. Short proofs for tricky formulas. Acta Informatica 22 (1985) 253–275.

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  9. D. Mitchell, B. Selman, and H.J. Levesque. Hard and easy distributions of SAT problems. Proceedings AAAI-92, San Jose,CA, 459–465.

    Google Scholar 

  10. M. Moskewicz, C. Madigan, Y. Zhao, L. Zhang, S. Malik. Chaff: Engineering an Efficient SAT Solver. Proceedings of DAC-2001.

    Google Scholar 

  11. C. Papadimitriou. On selecting a satisfying truth assignment. Proceedings of FOC-91.

    Google Scholar 

  12. A. Roy. Symmetry breaking and fault tolerance in Boolean satisfiability. PhD thesis. Downloadable from http://www.cs.uoregon.edu/~aroy/

  13. B. Selman, H. Kautz, B. Cohen. Noise strategies for improving local search. Proceedings of AAAI-94.

    Google Scholar 

  14. I. Shlyakhter. Generating effective symmetry breaking predicates for search problems. Proceedings of LICS 2001 Workshop on Theory and Applications of Satisfiability Testing

    Google Scholar 

  15. A. Urquhart. The symmetry rule in propositional logic. Discrete Applied Mathematics 96–97(1999):177–193,1999.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  16. H. Wong-Toi. Private communication.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2002 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Goldberg, E. (2002). Testing Satisfiability of CNF Formulas by Computing a Stable Set of Points. In: Voronkov, A. (eds) Automated Deduction—CADE-18. CADE 2002. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 2392. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-45620-1_15

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-45620-1_15

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-43931-8

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-540-45620-9

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics