Skip to main content

P-Hardness of Equivalence Testing on Finite-State Processes

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNCS,volume 2234))

Abstract

The paper shows a simple LOGSPACE-reduction from the boolean circuit value problem which demonstrates that, on finite labelled transition systems, deciding an arbitrary relation which subsumes bisimulation equivalence and is subsumed by trace preorder is a polynomialtime- hard problem (and thus can not be expected to be efficiently parallelizable). By this, the result of Balcázar, Gabarró and Sántha (1992) for bisimilarity is substantially extended.

Supported by the Grant Agency of the Czech Republic, Grant No. 201/00/0400

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. J. Balcázar, J. Gabarró, and M. Sántha. Deciding bisimilarity is P-complete. Formal Aspects of Computing, 4(6A):638–648, 1992.

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  2. A. Gibbons and W. Rytter. Efficient Parallel Algorithms. Cambridge University Press, 1988.

    Google Scholar 

  3. H. Hüttel and S. Shukla. On the complexity of deciding behavioural equivalences and preorders. Technical Report SUNYA-CS-96-03, State University of New York at Albany, Dec. 28, 1996. Also available at http://www.cs.auc.dk/~hans/Publications/pubs.html.

  4. P. Kanellakis and S. Smolka. CCS expressions, finite state processes and three problems of equivalence. Information and Computation, 86:43–68, 1990.

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  5. F. Laroussinie and P. Schnoebelen. The state explosion problem from trace to bisimulation equivalence. In Proc. FoSSaCS 2000, volume 1784 of Lecture Notes in Computer Science, pages 192–207. Springer Verlag, 2000.

    Google Scholar 

  6. R. Milner. Communication and Concurrency. Prentice-Hall, 1989.

    Google Scholar 

  7. R. Paige and R. Tarjan. Three partition refinement algorithms. SIAM Journal on Computing, 16:937–989, 1987.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  8. A. Rabinovich. Complexity of equivalence problems for concurrent systems of finite agents. Information and Computation, 139(2):111–129, 1997.

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  9. R. van Glabbeek. The linear time — branching time spectrum. In Proceedings CONCUR’90, volume 458 of Lecture Notes in Computer Science, pages 278–297, Amsterdam, 1990. Springer-Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2001 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Sawa, Z., Jančar, P. (2001). P-Hardness of Equivalence Testing on Finite-State Processes. In: Pacholski, L., Ružička, P. (eds) SOFSEM 2001: Theory and Practice of Informatics. SOFSEM 2001. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 2234. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-45627-9_29

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-45627-9_29

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-42912-8

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-540-45627-8

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics