Skip to main content

Interacting with a Musical Learning System: The Continuator

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNAI,volume 2445))

Abstract

The Continuator system is an attempt to bridge the gap between two classes of traditionally incompatible musical systems: 1) interactive musical systems, limited in their ability to generate stylistically consistent material, and 2) music composition systems, which are fundamentally not interactive. The purpose of Continuator is to extend the technical ability of musicians with stylistically consistent, automatically learnt musical material. This requires the ability for the system to build operational representations of musical styles in real time, and to adapt quickly to external musical information. The Continuator is based on a Markov model of musical styles augmented to account for efficient real time learning of musical styles and to arbitrary external bias. The paper describes the main technical issues at stake concerning the integration of an agnostic learning scheme in an interactive instrument, and reports on realworld experiments performed with various musicians.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Assayag, G. Dubnov, S. Delerue, O. Guessing the Composer’s Mind: Applying Universal Prediction to Musical Style, Proc. ICMC 99, Beijing, China, I.C.M.A., San-Francisco, 1999.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Baggi, D. L. NeurSwing: An Intelligent Workbench for the Investigation of Swing in Jazz, in Readings in Computer Generated Music, IEEE Computer Society Press, 1992.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Biles, John A. Interactive GenJam: Integrating Real-Time Performance with a Genetic Algorithm, Proc. ICMC 98, Ann Arbor, Michigan, 1998.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Jan Borchers, Designing Interactive Musical Systems: a Pattern Approach, HCI International’ 99. 8th International Conference on Human-Computer Interaction, Munich, Germany, from 22–27 August, 1999.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Conklin, D. and Witten, Ian H. Multiple Viewpoint Systems for Music Prediction, JNMR, 24:1, 51–73, 1995.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Cope, David. Experiments in Musical Intelligence. Madison, WI: A-R Editions, 1996.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Heuser, Jorg, Pat Martino—His contributions and influence to the history of modern Jazz guitar. Ph.D thesis, University of Mainz (Ge), 1994.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Hiller, L. and Isaacson, A., Experimental Music, New York: McGraw-Hill, 1959.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Karma music workstation, Basic guide. Korg Inc. Available at: http://www.korg.com/downloads/pdf/KARMA_BG.pdf, 2001.

  10. Lartillot O., Dubnov S., Assayag G., Bejerano G., Automatic modeling of musical style Proc. ICMC 2001, La Habana, Cuba.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Orlarey, Y. Lequay, H. MidiShare: a Real Time multi-tasks software module for Midi applications Proceedings of the International Computer Music Conference, Computer Music Association, San Francisco, pp. 234–237, 1989.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Pachet, F. Roy, P. “Automatic Harmonization: a Survey”, Constraints Journal, Kluwer, 6:1, 2001.

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  13. Pachet, F. “Content-Based Management for Electronic Music Distribution”, Communications of the ACM, to appear, 2002.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Ramalho G., Ganascia J.-G. Simulating Creativity in Jazz Performance. Proceedings of the National Conference in Artificial Intelligence, pp. 108–113, AAAI-94, Seattle, AAAI Press, 1994.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Robert Rowe, Machine Musicianship, MIT Press, 2001.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Ron, D. Singer, Y and Tishby, N., “The power of amnesia: learning probabilistic automata with variable memory length”, Machine Learning 25(2–3):117–149, 1996.

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  17. J. L. Trivino-Rodriguez; R. Morales-Bueno, Using Multiattribute Prediction Suffix Graphs to Predict and Generate Music, Computer Music Journal 25(3) pp. 62–79, 2001.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. William F. Walker A Computer Participant in Musical Improvisation, Proc. of CHI 1997. Atlanta, ACM Press, 1997.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2002 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Pachet, F. (2002). Interacting with a Musical Learning System: The Continuator. In: Anagnostopoulou, C., Ferrand, M., Smaill, A. (eds) Music and Artificial Intelligence. ICMAI 2002. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 2445. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-45722-4_12

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-45722-4_12

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-44145-8

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-540-45722-0

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics