Skip to main content

MetaDL: A Digital Library of Metadata for Sensitive or Complex Research Data

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Research and Advanced Technology for Digital Libraries (ECDL 2002)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNCS,volume 2458))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

Traditional digital library systems have certain limitations when dealing with complex or sensitive (e.g. proprietary) data. Collections of digital libraries have to be accessed individually and through non-uniform interfaces. By introducing a level of abstraction, a Meta- Digital Library or MetaDL, users gain a central access portal that allows for prioritized queries, evaluation and rating of the results, and secure negotiations to obtain primary data. This paper demonstrates the MetaDL architecture with an application in brain imaging research, BrassDL, the Brain Support Access System Digital Library. BrassDL is currently under development. This paper describes a theoretical framework behind it, addressing aspects from metadata extraction and system-supported negotiations to legal, ethical and sustainability issues.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. F. Andres, N. Mouaddib, K. Ono, and A. Zhang. Metadata model, resource discovery, and querying on large scale multidimensional datasets: The GEREQ project. In Kyoto International Conference on Digital Libraries, pages 83–90, 2000.

    Google Scholar 

  2. M. Baldonado, C.-C. K. Chang, L. Gravano, and A. Paepcke. The Stanford Digital Library metadata architecture. International Journal on Digital Libraries, 1(2):108–121, 1997.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. J. S. Barrett and S. P. J. Koprowski. The epiphany of data warehousing technologies in the pharmaceutical industry. International Journal of Clinical Pharmacology and Therapeutics, 40(3):S3–13, March 2002.

    Google Scholar 

  4. J. M. Carazo and E. H. K. Stelzer. The BioImage database project: Organizing multidimensional biological images in an object-relational database. Journal of Structural Biology, 125:97–102, 1999.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. M. Chicurel. Databasing the brain. Nature, 406:822–825, August 2000.

    Google Scholar 

  6. C. Crasto, L. Marenco, P. Miller, and G. Shepherd. Olfactory Receptor Database: a metadata-driven automated population from sources of gene and protein sequences. Nucleic Acids Research, 30(1):354–360, 2002.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. European Computerised Human Brain Database (ECHBD). http://fornix.neuro.ki.se/ECHBD/Database.

  8. J. Ford, F. Makedon, L. Shen, T. Steinberg, A. Saykin, and H. Wishart. Evaluation metrics for user-centered ranking of content in MetaDLs. In Fourth DELOS Workshop on Evaluation of digital libraries: Testbeds, measurements, and metrics, Budapest, Hungary, June 2002.

    Google Scholar 

  9. P. T. Fox and J. L. Lancaster. Mapping context and content: the BrainMap model. Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 3(4):319–321, 2002.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. J. Frew, M. Freeston, N. Freitas, L. Hill, G. Janee, K. Lovette, R. Nideffer, T. Smith, and Q. Zheng. The Alexandria Digital Library architecture. International Journal on Digital Libraries, 2(4):259–268, 2000.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. D. Gardner, M. Abato, K. H. Knuth, R. DeBellis, and S. M. Erde. Dynamic publication model for neurophysiology databases. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London: Biological Sciences, 356(1412):1229–1247, 2001.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. D. Gardner, K. H. Knuth, M. Abato, S. M. Erde, T. White, R. DeBellis, and E. P. Gardner. Common data model for neuroscience data and data model exchange. Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association, 8(1):103–104, 2001.

    Google Scholar 

  13. M. Gelobter. Public data-archiving: a fair return on publicly funded research. Psycoloquy: 3(56) Data Archive (3), 1992.

    Google Scholar 

  14. M. A. Gonçalves, R. K. France, and E. A. Fox. MARIAN: Flexible interoperability for federated digital libraries. In Proceedings of ECDL 2001, the 5th European Conference on Research and Advanced Technology for Digital Libraries, pages 173–186, Darmstadt, Germany, September 2001. Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  15. J. S. Grethe, J. D. Van Horn, J. B. Woodward, S. Inati, P. J. Kostelec, J. A. Aslam, D. Rockmore, D. Rus, and M. S. Gazzaniga. The fMRI Data Center: An introduction. NeuroImage, 13(6):S135, 2001.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. C. Houstis and S. Lalis. ARION: An advanced lightweight software system architecture for accessing scientific collections. Cultivate Interactive, 4, May 2001.

    Google Scholar 

  17. S. Kapidakis, F. Makedon, L. Shen, T. Steinberg, and J. Ford. A negotiation model for mediated sharing of private digital data, 2002. In preparation.

    Google Scholar 

  18. S. H. Koslow. Should the neuroscience community make a paradigm shift to sharing primary data? (editorial). Nature Neuroscience, 3:863–865, September 2000.

    Google Scholar 

  19. S. H. Koslow. Sharing primary data: A threat or asset to discovery? (editorial). Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 3:311–313, April 2002.

    Google Scholar 

  20. D. Krotz. PET and MRI race to detect early Alzheimer s. AuntMinnie.com, January 2001. http://www.auntminnie.com/index.asp?Sec=nws&sub=rad&=dis&=50098.

  21. E. Marshall. Downloading the human brain with security. Science, 289(5488): 2250, September 2000.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. E. Marshall. A ruckus over releasing images of the human brain. Science, 289(5484):1458–1459, September 2000.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. E. Marshall. DNA sequencer protests being scooped with his own data. Science, 295(5558):1206–1207, February 2002.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. P. Miller. Collected wisdom. D-Lib Magazine, 6(9), September 2000.

    Google Scholar 

  25. The Organization for Human Brain Mapping (OHBM). http://www.humanbrainmapping.org.

  26. L. Roberts, R. J. Davenport, E. Pennisi, and E. Marshall. A history of the Human Genome Project. Science, 291(5507):1195, 2001.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. P. Roland, G. Svensson, T. Lindeberg, T. Risch, P. Baumann, A. Dehmel, J. Frederiksson, H. Halldorson, L. Forsberg, J. Young, and K. Zilles. A database generator for human brain imaging. Trends in Neuroscience, 24(10):562–564, 2001.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. J. R. Skoyles. FTP internet data archiving: A cousin for psycoloquy. Psycoloquy: 3(29) Data Archive (1), 1992.

    Google Scholar 

  29. M. Sweet and D. Thomas. Archives described at collection level. D-Lib Magazine, 6(9), September 2000.

    Google Scholar 

  30. J. D. Van Horn, G. J. S., P. Kostelec, J. B. Woodward, J. A. Aslam, D. Rus, D. Rockmore, and M. S. Gazzaniga. The Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging Data Center (fMRIDC): The challenges and rewards of large-scale databasing of neuroimaging studies. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London: Biological Sciences, 356(1412):1323–1339, 2001.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. D. A. Wagner. Early detection of Alzheimer s disease: An fMRI marker for people at risk? Nature Neuroscience, 3(10):973–974, 2000.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2002 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Makedon, F. et al. (2002). MetaDL: A Digital Library of Metadata for Sensitive or Complex Research Data. In: Agosti, M., Thanos, C. (eds) Research and Advanced Technology for Digital Libraries. ECDL 2002. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 2458. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-45747-X_28

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-45747-X_28

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-44178-6

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-540-45747-3

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics