Skip to main content

Customising a Copying-Identi.er for Biomedical Science Student Reports: Comparing Simple and Smart Analyses

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Artificial Intelligence and Cognitive Science (AICS 2002)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNAI,volume 2464))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

The aim of our project is to develop a system for detecting student copying in Biomedical Science laboratory practical reports. We compare contrasting approaches: “simple” methods Zipping, based on a standard file-compression tool, and Bigrams, a basic comparison of frequent bigrams; and “smart” methods using commercial-strength plagiarism-checking systems Turnitin, Copycatch, and Copyfind. Both approaches successfully flag examples of copying in our Test Corpus of 218 student courseworks, but Copycatch provides more user-friendly batch-processing mechanism. Human experts go beyond word-based pattern matching, and take account of knowledge specific to our domain: methods and questions can legitimately be copied, whereas originality is more important in the Discussion section.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. CheatChecker: http://www.cse.ucsc.edu/~elm/Software/CheatChecker/

  2. SIM: http://www.few.vu.nl/~dick/sim.html

  3. YAP: http://www.cs.su.oz.au/~michaelw/YAP.html

  4. CopyCatch: http://www.copycatch.freeserve.co.uk

  5. CopyFind: http://plagiarism.phys.virginia.edu/software.html

  6. Turnitin: http://www.turnitin.com/

  7. Clough, P.: http://www.dcs.shef.ac.uk/~cloughie/

  8. Benedetto, D., Caglioti, E., Loreto, V.: Language Trees and Zipping. Physical Review Letters, Vol. 88,4 (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Bull, J., Collins, C., Coughlin, E., Sharp, D.: Technical Review of Plagiarism Detection Software Report. JISC (2001)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Wassall, Terry: On-line Plagiarism Detection Projects 2001-2002. FLDU Technical Report, University of Leeds (2002)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2002 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Medori, J., Atwell, E., Gent, P., Souter, C. (2002). Customising a Copying-Identi.er for Biomedical Science Student Reports: Comparing Simple and Smart Analyses. In: O’Neill, M., Sutcliffe, R.F.E., Ryan, C., Eaton, M., Griffith, N.J.L. (eds) Artificial Intelligence and Cognitive Science. AICS 2002. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 2464. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-45750-X_31

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-45750-X_31

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-44184-7

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-540-45750-3

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics