Skip to main content

Theoretical and Empirical Aspects of a Planner in a Multi-agent Environment

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Logics in Artificial Intelligence (JELIA 2002)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNAI,volume 2424))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

We give the theoretical foundations and empirical evaluation of a planning agent, ashop, performing HTN planning in a multi-agent environment. ashop is based on ASHOP, an agentised version of the original SHOP HTN planning algorithm, and is integrated in the IMPACT multi-agent environment. We ran several experiments involving accessing various distributed, heterogeneous information sources, based on simplified versions of noncombatant evacuation operations, NEO’s. As a result, we noticed that in such realistic settings the time spent on communication (including network time) is orders of magnitude higher than the actual inference process. This has important consequences for optimisations of such planners. Our main results are: (1) using NEO’s as new, more realistic benchmarks for planners acting in an agent environment, and (2) a memoization mechanism implemented on top of shop, which improves the overall performance considerably.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Eiter, T., Subrahmanian, V., Pick, G.: Heterogeneous Active Agents, I: Semantics. Artificial Intelligence 108 (1999) 179–255

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  2. Subrahmanian, V., Bonatti, P., Dix, J., Eiter, T., Kraus, S., Özcan, F., Ross, R.: Heterogenous Active Agents. MIT Press (2000)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Dix, J., Munoz-Avila, H., Nau, D., Zhang, L.: IMPACTing SHOP: Putting an AI planner into a Multi-Agent Environment. Annals of Mathematics and AI (2002), to appear.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Siegel, A.: Eastern Exit: The noncombatant evacuation operation (NEO) from Mogadishu, Somalia, in January 1991 (TR CRM 91-221). Arlington, VA: Center for Naval Analyses (1991)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Nau, D., Cao, Y., Lotem, A., Muñoz-Avila, H.: Shop: Simple hierarchical ordered planner. In: Proceedings of IJCAI-99. (1999)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Eiter, T., Subrahmanian, V., Rogers, T.J.: Heterogeneous Active Agents, III: Polynomially Implementable Agents. Artificial Intelligence 117 (2000) 107–167

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  7. Zhang, L.: Documentation for ASHOP 1.0. Technical Report CSC-TR 2102, University of Maryland (2002) Master Thesis.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Bacchus, F.: The AIPS’00 Planning Competition. AI Magazine 22 (2001)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Munoz-Avila, H., Aha, D., Nau, D., Weber, R., Breslow, L., Yaman, F.: Sin: Integrating case-based reasoning with task decomposition. In: Proceedings of IJCAI-01. (2001)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Wilkins, D.: Practical planning-extending the classical AI planning paradigm. Morgan Kaufmann (1988)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Currie, K., Tate, A.: O-plan: the open planning architecture. Artificial Intelligence 52(1) (1991)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Bacchus, F., Kabanza, F.: Using Temporal Logics to Express Search Control Knowledge for Planning. Artificial Intelligence 116 (2000) 123–191

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  13. Köhler, J.: Planning under Resource Constraints. In: Proceedings of the 13th European Conference on Artificial Intelligence. (1998) 489–493

    Google Scholar 

  14. Kautz, H., Walser, J.P.: State-space Planning by Integer Optimization. In: Proceedings of the 17th National Conference of the American Association for Artificial Intelligence. (1999) 526–533

    Google Scholar 

  15. Wolfman, S.A., Weld, D.S.: The LPSAT Engine and its Application to Resource Planning. In: Proceedings of the 15th International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence. (1999) 310–317

    Google Scholar 

  16. Etzioni, O., Weld, D., Draper, D., Lesh, N., Williamson, M.: An approach to planning with incomplete information. In: Proceedings of KR-92. (1992)

    Google Scholar 

  17. Golden, K., Etzioni, O., Weld, D.: Omnipotence without omniscience: efficient sensor management for planning. In: Proceedings of AAAI-94. (1994)

    Google Scholar 

  18. Knoblock, C.: Building a planner for information gathering: a report from the trenches. In: Proceedings of AIPS-96. (1996)

    Google Scholar 

  19. Friedman, M., Weld, D.: Efficiently executing information-gathering plans. In: Proceedings of IJCAI-97. (1997)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2002 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Dix, J., Munoz-Avila, H., Nau, D., Zhang, L. (2002). Theoretical and Empirical Aspects of a Planner in a Multi-agent Environment. In: Flesca, S., Greco, S., Ianni, G., Leone, N. (eds) Logics in Artificial Intelligence. JELIA 2002. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 2424. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-45757-7_15

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-45757-7_15

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-44190-8

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-540-45757-2

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics