Skip to main content

Quality Enhancement of Reconstructed 3D Models Using Coplanarity and Constraints

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNCS,volume 2449))

Abstract

We present a process to improve the structural quality of automatically acquired architectural 3D models. Common architectural features like orientations of walls are exploited. The location of these features is extracted by using a probabilistic technique (RANSAC). The relationships among the features are automatically obtained by labelling them using a semantic net of an architectural scene. An evolutionary algorithm is used to optimise the orientations of the planes. Small irregularities in the planes are removed by projecting the triangulation vertices onto the planes. Planes in the resulting model are aligned to each other. The technique produces models with improved appearance. It is validated on synthetic and real data.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. C. Baillard and A. Zisserman. A plane-sweep strategy for the 3d reconstruction of buildings from multiple images. ISPRS Journal of Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing, 33(B2):56–62, 2000.

    Google Scholar 

  2. A. Bartoli. Piecewise planar segmentation for automatic scene modeling. Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, Hawaii, pages 283–289, 2001.

    Google Scholar 

  3. P. Dias, V. Sequeira, J.G.M. Goncalves, and F. Vaz. Combining intensity and range images for 3d architectural modelling. International Symposium on Virtual and Augmented Architecture, Dublin, pages 139–145, 2001.

    Google Scholar 

  4. A. Dick, P. Torr, and R. Cipolla. Automatic 3d modelling of architecture. British Machine Vision Conference, Bristol, pages 372–381, 2000.

    Google Scholar 

  5. M.A. Fischler and R.C. Bolles. Random sample consensus: A paradigm for model fitting with application to image analysis and automated cartography. Communications of the ACM, 24(6):381–395, 1981.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  6. A.K. Jain and R.C. Dubes. Algorithms for Clustering Data. Prentice Hall, 1988.

    Google Scholar 

  7. D. Liebowitz, A. Criminisi, and A. Zisserman. Creating architectural models from images. Eurographics, 18(3):39–50, 1999.

    Google Scholar 

  8. C.-E. Liedtke, O. Grau, and S. Growe. Use of explicit knowledge for the reconstruction of 3d object geometry. International Conference on Computer Analysis of Images and Patterns, Prague, pages 580–587, 1995.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Z. Michalewicz. Genetic Algorithms + Data Structures = Evolution Programs. Springer, 1996.

    Google Scholar 

  10. M. Pollefeys. Self-calibration and metric 3D reconstruction from uncalibrated image sequences. PhD thesis, University of Loewen, 1999.

    Google Scholar 

  11. C. Robertson, R.B. Fisher, N. Werghi, and A. Ashbrook. Fitting of constrained feature models to poor 3d data. Proceedings Adaptive Computing in Design and Manufacture, Plymouth, pages 149–160, 2000.

    Google Scholar 

  12. V. Sequeira, K. Ng, E. Wolfart, J.G.M. Goncalves, and D.C. Hogg. Automated reconstruction of 3d models from real environments. ISPRS Journal of Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing, 54:1–22, 1999.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. D.L. Waltz. Generating Semantic Descriptions from Drawings of Scenes with Shadows. PhD thesis, AI Lab, MIT, 1972.

    Google Scholar 

  14. N. Werghi, R.B. Fisher, A. Ashbrook, and C. Robertson. Shape reconstruction incorporating multiple non-linear geometric constraints. Computer-Aided Design, 31(6):363–399, 1999.

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  15. M. Wilczkowiak, E. Boyer, and P.F. Sturm. Camera calibration and 3d reconstruction from single images using parallelepipeds. International Conference on Computer Vision, Vancouver, pages 142–148, 2001.

    Google Scholar 

  16. H. Zabrodsky and D. Weinshall. Using bilateral symmetry to improve 3d reconstruction from image sequences. Computer Vision and Image Understanding, 67(1):48–57, 1997.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2002 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Cantzler, H., Fisher, R.B., Devy, M. (2002). Quality Enhancement of Reconstructed 3D Models Using Coplanarity and Constraints. In: Van Gool, L. (eds) Pattern Recognition. DAGM 2002. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 2449. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-45783-6_5

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-45783-6_5

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-44209-7

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-540-45783-1

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics