Skip to main content

A Receiver-Driven Adaptive Mechanism Based on the Popularity of Scalable Sessions

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
From QoS Provisioning to QoS Charging (QofIS 2002, ICQT 2002)

Abstract

Receiver-driven adaptation allows streaming of multimedia content to different receivers across heterogeneous networks. However, receivers are only encouraged to adapt if network providers guarantee a fair distribution of bandwidth and also the punishment of receivers that do not adjust their rate in case of congestion. We define a receiver-driven adaptive mechanism based on a new fairness protocol that provides the required guarantees for adaptation. We use simulations to evaluate the proposed mechanism and to compare its performance with other receiver-driven mechanisms.

This work is supported by POSI-Programa Operacional Sociedade de Informação of Portuguese Fundação para a Ciência e Tecnologia and European Union FEDER

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Dimitri Bertsekas and Robert Gallager. Data Networks. Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey, 1987.

    Google Scholar 

  2. S. Blake, D. Black, M. Carlson, E. Davies, Z. Wang, and W. Weiss. An architecture for differentiated service. Request for Comments 2475, Internet Engineering Task Force, December 1998.

    Google Scholar 

  3. M. Handley, C. Perkins, and E. Whelan. Session announcement protocol. Request for Comments 2974, Internet Engineering Task Force, October 2000.

    Google Scholar 

  4. J. Heinanen, F. Baker, W. Weiss, and J. Wroclawski. Assured forwarding PHB group. Request for Comments 2597, Internet Engineering Task Force, June 1999.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Junichi Kimura, Fouad A. Tobagi, Jose-Miguel Pulido, and Peder J. Emstad. Perceived quality and bandwidth characterization of layered MPEG-2 video encoding. In Proc. of SPIE International Symposium, Boston, Massachussetes, USA, September 1999.

    Google Scholar 

  6. ITU-500-R. ”Methodology for the subjective assessment of quality of television pictures”. Itu-500-r recommendation bt.500-8, ITU, 1998.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Mathias Johanson. Scalable video conferencing using subband transform coding and layered multicast transmission. In Proc. of International Conference on Signal Processing Applications and Technology (ICSPAT), Orlando, Florida, USA, November 1999.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Srinivasan Keshav. A control-theoretic approach to flow control. In Proc. of SIGCOMM Symposium on Communications Architectures and Protocols, pages 3–15, Zürich, Switzerland, September 1991. ACM. also in Computer Communication Review 21(4), Sep. 1991.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Arnaud Legout and Ernst Biersack. Pathological behaviors for RLM and RLC. In Proc. of the International Workshop on Network and Operating System Support for Digital Audio and Video (NOSSDAV), Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA, June 2000.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Arnaud Legout and Ernst W. Biersack. PLM: Fast convergence for cumulative layered multicast transmission schemes. technical report, Institut Eurécom, Sophia-Antipolis, France, November 1999.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Arnaud Legout and Ernst W. Biersack. PLM: Fast convergence for cumulative layered multicast transmission schemes. In Proc. of ACM SIGMETRICS performance evaluation review, Santa Clara, California, USA, June 2000.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Steven McCanne, Van Jacobson, and Martin Vetterli. Receiver-driven layered multicast. In Proc. of SIGCOMM Symposium on Communications Architectures and Protocols, pages 117–130, Palo Alto, California, USA, August 1996.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Paulo Mendes. ”SAPRA: Session-Aware Popurality-based Resource Allocation fairness protocol”. http://www.cs.columbia.edu~mendes/sapra.html.

  14. Paulo Mendes, Henning Schulzrinne, and Edmundo Monteiro. Session-aware popularity resource allocation for assured differentiated services. In Proc. of the Second IFIP-TC6 Networking Conference, Pisa, Italy, May 2002.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Paulo Mendes, Henning Schulzrinne, and Edmundo Monteiro. Signaling protocol for session-aware popularity-based resource allocation. In To appear in Proc. of the IFIP/IEEE International Conference on Management of Multimedia Networks and Services, Santa Barbara, California, USA, October 2002.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Abhay K. Parekh and Robert G. Gallager. A generalized processor sharing approach to flow control in integrated services networks: The single node case. Journal of IEEE/ACM Transactions on Networking, 1(3):344–357, June 1993.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Gopalakrishnan Raman, James Griffioen, Gisli Hjalmtysson, and Cormac Sreenan. Stability and fairness issues in layered multicast. In Proc. of the International Workshop on Network and Operating System Support for Digital Audio and Video (NOSSDAV), Basking Ridge, New Jersey, USA, June 1999.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Kenneth Rose and Shankar L. Regunathan. Toward optimality in scalable predictive coding. Journal of IEEE Transactions on Image Processing, 10(7):965–976, July 2001.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Dan Rubenstein, Jim Kurose, and Don Towsley. The impact of multicast layering on network fairness. In Proc. of SIGCOMM Symposium on Communications Architectures and Protocols, Cambridge, Massachussetes, USA, September 1999.

    Google Scholar 

  20. H. Schulzrinne, S. Casner, R. Frederick, and V. Jacobson. RTP: a transport protocol for real-time applications. Request for Comments 1889, Internet Engineering Task Force, January 1996.

    Google Scholar 

  21. David Taubman and Avideh Zakhor. Multirate 3-D subband coding of video. Journal of IEEE Transactions on Image Processing, 3(5):572–588, September 1994.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Lorenzo Vicisano, Luigi Rizzo, and Jon Crowcroft. TCP-Like congestion control for layered multicast data transfer. In Proc. of the Conference on Computer Communications (IEEE Infocom), San Francisco, California, USA, March/April 1998.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2002 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Mendes, P., Schulzrinne, H., Monteiro, E. (2002). A Receiver-Driven Adaptive Mechanism Based on the Popularity of Scalable Sessions. In: Stiller, B., Smirnow, M., Karsten, M., Reichl, P. (eds) From QoS Provisioning to QoS Charging. QofIS ICQT 2002 2002. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 2511. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-45859-X_2

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-45859-X_2

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-44356-8

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-540-45859-3

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics