Skip to main content

Selecting Neural Networks for Making a Committee Decision

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNCS,volume 2415))

Abstract

To improve recognition results, decisions of multiple neural networks can be aggregated into a committee decision. In contrast to the ordinary approach of utilizing all neural networks available to make a committee decision, we propose creating adaptive committees, which are specific for each input data point. A prediction network is used to identify classification neural networks to be fused for making a committee decision about a given input data point. The jth output value of the prediction network expresses the expectation level that the jth classification neural network will make a correct decision about the class label of a given input data point. The effectiveness of the approach is demonstrated on two artificial and three real data sets.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Breiman, L.: Half & Half bagging and hard boundary points. Technical report 534, Statistics Departament, University of California, Berkeley (1998)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Delve. http://www.cs.toronto.edu/~delve/

  3. Efron, B., Tibshirani, R.: An introduction to the bootstrap. Chapman and Hall, London, (1993)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  4. Freund, Y., Schapire, R. E.: A decision-theoretic generalization of on-line learning and an application to boosting. Journal of Computer and System Sciences 55 (1997) 119–139

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  5. ELENA. http://ftp.dice.ucl.ac.be/pub/neural-net/ELENA/databases

  6. Kittler, J., Hatef, M., Duin, R. P. W., Matas, J.: On combining classifiers. IEEE Trans Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence 20(3) (1998) 226–239

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Verikas, A., Lipnickas, A., Malmqvist, K., Bacauskiene, M., Gelzinis, A.: Soft combination of neural classifiers: A comparative study. Pattern Recognition Letters 20 (1999) 429–444

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Verikas, A. et al.: Fusing neural networks through fuzzy integration. In H. Bunke, A. Kandel, editors, Hybrid Methods in Pattern Recognition, World Scientific (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Xu, L., Krzyzak, A., Suen, C. Y.: Methods for combining multiple classifiers and their appli-cations to handwriting recognition. IEEE Trans. Systems, Man, and Cybernetics 22(3) (1992) 418–435

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2002 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Verikas, A., Lipnickas, A., Malmqvist, K. (2002). Selecting Neural Networks for Making a Committee Decision. In: Dorronsoro, J.R. (eds) Artificial Neural Networks — ICANN 2002. ICANN 2002. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 2415. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-46084-5_68

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-46084-5_68

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-44074-1

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-540-46084-8

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics