Skip to main content

Conceptual Change in Learning Naive Physics: The Computational Model as a Theory Revision Process

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Book cover AI*IA 99: Advances in Artificial Intelligence (AI*IA 1999)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNAI,volume 1792))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

This work concerns a research project aiming at studying whether a machine learning system could reproduce the changes in the concept of force observed in children. The theoretical framework proposed considers learning as a process of formation and revision of a logical theory. INTHELEX, an incremental learning system, was used to emulate the transitions occurring in the human learning process. The experiment proved very interesting both for improving the computational model and for supporting a conceptual change by means of a model shift.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. K.L. Clark, Negation as failure. Logic and Data Bases, Gallaire, H. and Minker, J., (Eds.), Plenum Press, 293–322, 1978.

    Google Scholar 

  2. F. Esposito, A. Laterza, D. Malerba, and G. Semeraro. Locally Finite, Proper and Complete Operators for Refining Datalog Programs. Foundations of Intelligent Systems, Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence 1079, Z.W. Ras and M. Michalewicz (Eds.), Springer, 468–478, 1996.

    Google Scholar 

  3. F. Esposito, E. Lamma, D. Malerba, P. Mello, M. Milano, F. Riguzzi, G. Semeraro. Learning Abductive Logic Programs. ECAI 96 Workshop on Abductive and Inductive Reasoning, Workshop Notes, 1996.

    Google Scholar 

  4. F. Esposito, G. Semeraro, N. Fanizzi, and S. Ferilli. Multistrategy Theory Revision with INTHELEX. Proceedings of the 4 th International Workshop on Multistrategy Learning, MSL-98, F. Esposito, R.S. Michalski and L. Saitta (Eds.), 65–74, 1998.

    Google Scholar 

  5. A.C. Kakas, and P. Mancarella. On the Relation of Truth Maintenance and Abduction. Proceedings of the 1st Pacific Rim International Conference on Artificial Intelligence, PRICAI 90, Nagoya, Japan, 1990.

    Google Scholar 

  6. J.W. Lloyd. Foundations of Logic Programming, Springer-Verlag, 2nd edition.

    Google Scholar 

  7. D.E. Rumelhart, and D.A. Norman. Accretion, Tuning and Restructuring: Three modes of Learning. Semantic Factors in Cognition, J.W. Cotton and R.L. Klatzky, Erlbaum, Hillsdale, NJ, 1977.

    Google Scholar 

  8. G. Semeraro, F. Esposito, N. Fanizzi, and D. Malerba. Revision of Logical Theories. Topics in Artificial Intelligence, Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence 992, M. Gori and G. Soda (Eds.), Springer, 365–376, 1995.

    Google Scholar 

  9. P.R.J. van der Laag, and S.-H. Nienhuys-Cheng. Existence and Nonexistence of Complete Refinement Operators. Machine Learning: ECML-94-Proceedings of the European Conference on Machine Learning, Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence 784, F. Bergadano and L. De Raedt (Eds.), 307–322, Springer-Verlag, 1994.

    Google Scholar 

  10. S. Vosniadou. Capturing and modeling the process of conceptual change. Learning and Instruction, 4, 1994.

    Google Scholar 

  11. S. Vosniadou, C. Ioannides, A. Dimitracopoulou, D. Kayser, M. Champesme, F. Esposito, G. Semeraro, D. Malerba, S. Ferilli. Modelling Conceptual Changes in Mechanics: An Interdisciplinary Perspective. Proceedings of the 2 nd European Conference on Cognitive Modelling (ECCM-98), E. Ritter and R. M. Young (Eds.), Nottingham UK, 1998.

    Google Scholar 

  12. S. Wrobel. Concept Formation and Knowledge Revision, Kluwer Academic Publishers, 1994.

    Google Scholar 

  13. S. Wrobel. First Order Theory Refinement. Advances in Inductive Logic Programming, L. De Raedt (Ed.), 14–33, IOS Press, Amsterdam, 1996.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2000 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Esposito, F., Semeraro, G., Fanizzi, N., Ferilli, S. (2000). Conceptual Change in Learning Naive Physics: The Computational Model as a Theory Revision Process. In: Lamma, E., Mello, P. (eds) AI*IA 99: Advances in Artificial Intelligence. AI*IA 1999. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 1792. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-46238-4_19

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-46238-4_19

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-67350-7

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-540-46238-5

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics