Skip to main content

Enhancing Replica Management Services to Cope with Group Failures

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Book cover Advances in Distributed Systems

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNCS,volume 1752))

Abstract

In a distributed system, replication of components, such as objects, is a well known way of achieving availability. For increased availability, crashed and disconnected components must be replaced by new components on available spare nodes. This replacement results in the membership of the replicated group ‘walking’ over a number of machines during system operation. In this context, we address the problem of reconfiguring a group after the group as an entity has failed. Such a failure is termed a group failure which, for example, can be the crash of every component in the group or the group being partitioned into minority islands. The solution assumes crash-proof storage, and eventual recovery of crashed nodes and healing of partitions. It guarantees that (i) the number of groups reconfigured after a group failure is never more than one, and (ii) the reconfigured group contains a majority of the components which were members of the group just before the group failure occurred, so that the loss of state information due to a group failure is minimal. Though the protocol is subject to blocking, it remains efficient in terms of communication rounds and use of stable store, during both normal operations and reconfiguration after a group failure.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Y. Amir, Dolev, D., Kramer, S., and Malki, D., “Membership Algorithm for Multicast Communication Groups”, Proc. of 6th Intl. Workshop on Dist. Algorithms, pp 292–312, November 1992.

    Google Scholar 

  2. O. Babaoglu, R. Davoli, and A Montresor, “Group Membership and View Synchrony in Partitionable Asynchronous Distributed Systems: Specifications”, Technical Report UBLCS-95-18, Dept. of Computer Science, University of Bologna, Italy, Nov 1995.

    Google Scholar 

  3. O. Babaoglu, A. Bartoli, and G Dini, “Enriched View Synchrony: A Programming Paradigm for Partitionable Asynchronous Distributed Systems”, IEEE ToCS, 46(6), June 1997, pp.642–658.

    Google Scholar 

  4. K. Birman and T. Joseph, “Exploiting virtual synchrony in distributed systems”, Proc. of 11th ACM Symposium on Operating System Principles, Austin, November 1987, pp. 123–138.

    Google Scholar 

  5. D. Black, P. Ezhilchelvan and S.K. Shrivastava, “Determining the Last Membership of a Process Group after a Total Failure”, Tech. Report No. 602, Dept. of Computing Science, University of Newcastle upon Tyne.

    Google Scholar 

  6. T. D. Chandra, V. Hadzilacos, and S. Toueg, “The weakest Failure Detector for Solving Consensus”, JACM, 43(4), pp. 685–722, July 1996.

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  7. P. Ezhilchelvan, R. Macedo and S. K. Shrivastava, “Newtop: a fault-tolerant group communication protocol”, 15th IEEE Intl. Conf. on Distributed Computing Systems, Vancouver, May 1995, pp. 296–306.

    Google Scholar 

  8. P D Ezhilchelvan and S K Shrivastava, “Enhancing Replica Management Services to Tolerate Group Failures”, Proceedings of the second International Symposium on Object oriented Real-time Computing (ISORC), May 1999, St Malo, France.

    Google Scholar 

  9. P Felber, R Guerraoui and A Schiper, “The implementation of CORBA Object service”, Theory and Prctice of Object Systems, Vol. 4,No. 2, 1998, pp. 93–105.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. J N Gray, “Notes on Database Operating Systems”, In Operating Systems: An Advanced Course, Lecture Notes In Computer Science, Vol 60, pp. 393–481. Springer Verlag, Berlin, 1978.

    Google Scholar 

  11. M. Hurfin and M. Raynal, “Asynchronous Protocols to Meet Real-Time Constraints: Is It Really Sensible? How to Proceed?”, Proc. of 1st Int. Symp. on Object-Oriented Real-Time Distributed Computing, (ISORC98) pp. 290–297, April 98.

    Google Scholar 

  12. S Jajodia and D Mutchler, “Dynamic Voting Algorithms for Maintaining the Consistency of a Replicated Database”, ACM Transactions on Database Systems, Vol 15,No 2, June 1990, pp. 230–280

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. I Keidar and D Dolev, “Increasing the Resilience of Distributed and Replicated Database Systems”, Journal of Computer and System Sciences (JCSS). 1995.

    Google Scholar 

  14. E Y Lotem, I Keidar and D Dolev, “Dynamic Voting for Consistent Primary Components”, Proceedings of ACM Symposium on Principles of Distributed Computing (PODC), pp. 63–71, 1997.

    Google Scholar 

  15. C Malloth and A Schiper, “Virtually Synchronous Communication in Large Scale Networks”, BROADCAST Third Year Report, Vol 3, Chapter 2, July 1995. (Anonymous ftp from broadcast.esprit.ec.org in directory projects/broadcast/reports)

    Google Scholar 

  16. P. M. Melliar-Smith, Moser L.E., and Agarwala, V., “Membership Algorithms for Asynchronous Distributed Systems”, Proc. of 12th Intl. Conf. on Distributed Comp. Systems, pp. 480–488, May 1991.

    Google Scholar 

  17. S. Mishra, L. Peterson and R. Schlichting, “A membership Protocol Based on Partial Order”, Proc. IFIP Conf. on Dependable Computing For Critical Applications, Tuscon, Feb. 1991, pp 137–145.

    Google Scholar 

  18. L.E. Moser, P.M. Melliar-Smith et al, “Totem: a Fault-tolerant multicast group communication system”, CACM, 39(4), April 1996, pp. 54–63.

    Google Scholar 

  19. P. Murray, R. Flemming, P. Harry and P. Vickers, “Somersault software fault-tolerance”, Hewlett-Packard Technical Report, 1997.

    Google Scholar 

  20. A. Ricciardi and K P Birman, “Using Process Groups to Implement Failure Detection in Asynchronous Environments”, In Proceedings of ACM symposium on PoDC, pp. 480–488, May 91.

    Google Scholar 

  21. A Schiper and A Sandoz, “Primary-Partition Virtually Synchronous Communication is Harder Than Consensus”, Proc. of the 8th International Workshop on Distributed Algorithms (WDAG-94), Sept. 94, LNCS 857, Springer Verlag. (Also in BROADCAST Second Year Report, Vol 2, October 1994).

    Google Scholar 

  22. D. Skeen, “Non-Blocking Commit Protocols”, ACM SIGMOD, pp.133–142, 1981.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2000 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Ezhilchelvan, P.D., Shrivastava, S.K. (2000). Enhancing Replica Management Services to Cope with Group Failures. In: Krakowiak, S., Shrivastava, S. (eds) Advances in Distributed Systems. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 1752. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-46475-1_4

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-46475-1_4

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-67196-1

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-540-46475-4

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics