Skip to main content

Answer Set Planning

Abstract

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Book cover Logic Programming and Nonmonotonic Reasoning (LPNMR 1999)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNAI,volume 1730))

Abstract

In “answer set programming”[5,7] solutions to a problem are represented by answer sets (known also as stable models), and not by answer substitutions produced in response to a query, as in conventional logic programming. Instead of Prolog, answer set programming uses software systems capable of computing answer sets. Four such systems were demonstrated at the Workshop on Logic- Based AI held in June of 1999 in Washington, DC: dlv1, smodels,2, DeReS3 and ccalc4.

Preliminary results appear in: M. Cadoli, L. Palopoli, A. Schaerf, and D. Vasile. np-spec: An executable specication language for solving all problems in NP. In Proc. of the 1st Intl. Workshop on Practical Aspects of Declarative Languages (PADL’99), number 1551 in Lecture Notes in Articial Intelligence. Springer- Verlag,1999.

Joint invited talk of LPNMR’99 and ICLP’99

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Yannis Dimopoulos, Bernhard Nebel, and Jana Koehler. Encoding planning problems in non-monotonic logic programs. In Proc. European Conf. on Planning 1997,pages 169–181, 1997.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Henry Kautz and Bart Selman. Planning as satisfiability. In Proc. ECAI-92, pages 359–363, 1992.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Vladimir Lifschitz. Action languages, answer sets and planning. In The Logic Programming Paradigm: a 25-Year Perspective, pages 357–373. Springer Verlag, 1999.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Vladimir Lifschitz and Hudson Turner. Representing transition systems by logic programs. This volume.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Victor Marek and Miros law Truszczyński. Stable models and an alternative logic programming paradigm. In The Logic Programming Paradigm: a 25-Year Perspective, pages 375–398. Springer Verlag, 1999.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Norman McCain and Hudson Turner. Causal theories of action and change. In Proc. AAAI-97, pages 460–465, 1997.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Ilkka Niemelä. Logic programs with stable model semantics as a constraint programming paradigm. Annals of Mathematics and Artificial Intelligence, 1999. To appear.

    Google Scholar 

  8. V.S. Subrahmanian and Carlo Zaniolo. Relating stable models and AI planning domains. In Proc. ICLP-95, 1995.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Hudson Turner. Representing actions in logic programs and default theories: a situation calculus approach. Journal of Logic Programming,31:245–298, 1997.

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1999 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Lifschitz, V. (1999). Answer Set Planning. In: Gelfond, M., Leone, N., Pfeifer, G. (eds) Logic Programming and Nonmonotonic Reasoning. LPNMR 1999. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 1730. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-46767-X_28

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-46767-X_28

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-66749-0

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-540-46767-0

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics