Skip to main content

Composing Cardinal Direction Relations

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNCS,volume 2121))

Abstract

We study the recent proposal of Goyal and Egenhofer who presented a model for qualitative spatial reasoning about cardinal directions. Our approach is formal and complements the presentation of Goyal and Egenhofer. We focus our efforts on the operation of composition for two cardinal direction relations. We point out that the only published method to compute the composition does not always work correctly. Then we consider progressively more expressive classes of cardinal direction relations and give composition algorithms for these classes. Our theoretical framework allows us to prove formally that our algorithms are correct. Finally, we demonstrate that in some cases, the binary relation resulting from the composition of two cardinal direction relations cannot be expressed using the relations defined by Goyal and Egenhofer.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. B. Bennett. Logical Representations for Automated Reasoning About Spatial Relations. PhD thesis, School of Computer Studies, University of Leeds, 1997.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Z. Cui, A.G. Cohn, and D.A. Randell. Qualitative and Topological Relationships in Spatial Databases. In Proceedings of SSD-93, pages 296–315, 1993.

    Google Scholar 

  3. M.J. Egenhofer. Reasoning about Binary Topological Relationships. In Proceedings of SSD-91, pages 143–160, 1991.

    Google Scholar 

  4. B. Faltings. Qualitative Spatial Reasoning Using Algebraic Topology. In Proceedings of COSIT-95, volume 988 of LNCS, 1995.

    Google Scholar 

  5. A.U. Frank. Qualitative Spatial Reasoning about Distances and Directions in Geographic Space. Journal of Visual Languages and Computing, 3:343–371, 1992.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. R. Goyal and M.J. Egenhofer. The Direction-Relation Matrix: A Representation for Directions Relations Between Extended Spatial Objects. In the annual assembly and the summer retreat of University Consortium for Geographic Information Systems Science, June 1997.

    Google Scholar 

  7. R. Goyal and M.J. Egenhofer. Cardinal Directions Between Extended Spatial Objects. IEEE Transactions on Data and Knowledge Engineering, (in press), 2000. Available at http://www.spatial.maine.edu/max/RJ36.html.

  8. P.C. Kanellakis, G.M. Kuper, and P.Z. Revesz. Constraint Query Languages. Journal of Computer and System Sciences, 51:26–52, 1995.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  9. M. Koubarakis. The Complexity of Query Evaluation in Indefinite Temporal Constraint Databases. Theoretical Computer Science, 171:25–60, January 1997. Special Issue on Uncertainty in Databases and Deductive Systems, Editor: L.V.S. Lakshmanan.

    Google Scholar 

  10. G. Ligozat. Reasoning About Cardinal Directions. Journal of Visual Languages and Computing, 9:23–44, 1998.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. S. Lipschutz. Set Theory and Related Topics. McGraw Hill, 1998.

    Google Scholar 

  12. D. Papadias. Relation-Based Representation of Spatial Knowledge. PhD thesis, Dept. of Electrical and Computer Engineering, National Technical University of Athens, 1994.

    Google Scholar 

  13. D. Papadias, N. Arkoumanis, and N. Karacapilidis. On The Retrieval of Similar Configurations. In Proceedings of 8th International Symposium on Spatial Data Handling (SDH), 1998.

    Google Scholar 

  14. D. Papadias, Y. Theodoridis, T. Sellis, and M.J. Egenhofer. Topological Relations in the World of Minimum Bounding Rectangles: A Study with R-trees. In Proceedings of ACM SIGMOD-95, pages 92–103, 1995.

    Google Scholar 

  15. C.H. Papadimitriou, D. Suciu, and V. Vianu. Topological Queries in Spatial Databases. Journal of Computer and System Sciences, 58(1):29–53, 1999.

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  16. D.A. Randell, Z. Cui, and A. Cohn. A Spatial Logic Based on Regions and Connection. In Principles of Knowledge Representation and Reasoning: Proceedings of the Third International Conference (KR’92). Morgan Kaufmann, October 1992.

    Google Scholar 

  17. J. Renz and B. Nebel. On the Complexity of Qualitative Spatial Reasoning: A Maximal Tractable Fragment of the Region Connection Calculus. Artificial Intelligence, 1–2:95–149, 1999.

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  18. A.P. Sistla, C. Yu, and R. Haddad. Reasoning About Spatial Relationships in Picture Retrieval Systems. In Proceedings of VLDB-94, pages 570–581, 1994.

    Google Scholar 

  19. S. Skiadopoulos and M. Koubarakis. Qualitative Spatial Reasoning with Cardinal Directions. Submitted for publication, 2001.

    Google Scholar 

  20. K. Zimmermann. Enhancing Qualitative Spatial Reasoning-Combining Orientation and Distance. In Proceedings of COSIT-93, volume 716 of LNCS, pages 69–76, 1993.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2001 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Skiadopoulos, S., Koubarakis, M. (2001). Composing Cardinal Direction Relations. In: Jensen, C.S., Schneider, M., Seeger, B., Tsotras, V.J. (eds) Advances in Spatial and Temporal Databases. SSTD 2001. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 2121. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-47724-1_16

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-47724-1_16

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-42301-0

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-540-47724-2

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics