Abstract
Dockets1 are traditional paper means for supporting specific classes of workflows which concentrate on content and its value for individuals and organizations. A docket prescribes and finally documents some content reviewingpro cess which is part of a larger value chain. Since contents represent essential investments they are carefully protected by principles like autonomy and ownership. However, value chains over contents materialize only in open and cooperative scenarios. Therefore, dockets aim at mediating carefully between open content availability for value-addingpro cesses and control for investment protection. In this paper we present dockets as an innovative conceptual model for investment-protectingv alue chains over content. The model is introduced essentially by graphical means and is substantiated by our first experience with docket-driven application development. We demonstrate how our basic docket model scales to support general content management.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Biron, P.V., Malhotra, A. (eds.): XML Schema Part 2: Datatypes. World Wide Web Consortium Working Draft (1999) http://www.w3.org/TR/xmlschema-2
Brodie, M.L., Mylopoulos, J., Schmidt, J.W. (eds.): On Conceptual Modeling. Springer (1984)
Buco, M.J., Chaar, J.K.: On the Integration of Project, Workflow, and Document Management. Technical Report, IBM (1996)
Buneman, P., Deutsch, A., Tan, W.: A Deterministic Model for Semistructured Data. Workshop on Query Processingf or Semistructured Data and Non-Standard Data Formats (1998)
Communications of the ACM, Special Issue on Traceability. 12 (1998)
Curran, T., Keller, G., Ladd, A.: SAP R/3 Business Blueprint: Understanding the Business Process Reference Model. Prentice Hall (1998)
Deacon, T.W.: The Symbolic Species. W.W. Norton & Co. (1997)
Grosso P., Veillard, D. (eds.): XML Fragment Interchange. W3C Working Draft (1999) http://www.w3.org/TR/WD-xml-fragment
Hayes-Roth, B., Brownston, L.: Multi-Agent Collaboration in Directed Improvisation. Technical Report, Stanford University (1994)
Hollingsworth, D.: The Workflow Reference Model. Workflow Management Coalition (1995) http://www.aiim.org/wfmc/standards/docs/tc003v11.pdf
Jelliffe, R., Jelliffe, R.A.: The XML and SGML Cookbook: Recipes for Structured Information. Prentice Hall (1998)
Joeris, G.: Change Management Needs Integrated Process and Configuration Management. ESEC/SIGSOFT FSE (1997) 125–141
Klyne, G.: Protocol-Independent Content Negotiation Framework. Draft, Internet Engineering Task Force http://info.internet.isi.edu:80/0/in-drafts/files/draft-ietf-conneg-requirements-02.txt 261
Koksal, P., Arpinar, S.N., Dogac, A.: Workflow History Management. SIGMOD Record 1 (1998) 67–75
Maler, E., DeRose, S. (eds.): XML Linking Language (XLink) W3C Working Draft (1998) http://www.w3.org/TR/WD-xlink
Mathiske, B., Matthes, F., Schmidt, J.W.: On Migrating Threads. NGITS 1995
Matthes, F.: Business Conversations: A High-level System Model for Agent Coordination. DBPL 1997: 355–372
Matthes, F., Schmidt, J.W.: Persistent Threads. VLDB 1994: 403–414
Matthes, F., Schroder, G., Schmidt, J.W.: Tycoon: A Scalable and Interoperable Persistent System Environment. In: M.P. Atkinson (ed.): Fully Integrated Data Environments. Springer-Verlag (1999, in press)
Matthes, F., Wegner, H., Hupe, P.: A Process-Oriented Approach to Software Component Definition. CAiSE 1999: 26–40
Medina-Mora, R., Winograd, T., Flores, R., Flores, F.: The ActionWorkflow Approach to Workflow Management Technology. CSCW 1992
Muth, P., Weissenfels, J., Gillmann, M., Weikum, G: Workflow History Management in Virtual Enterprises Using a Light-Weight Workflow Management System. RIDE 1999: 148–155
Palmer, J.D.: Traceability. In: Dorfman M., Thayer, R. H. (eds.): Software Engineering. IEEE Computer Society Press (1997)
Prinz, W., Kolvenbach, S.: Support for Workflows in a Ministerial Environment. CSCW 1996: 199–208
Ramesh B., Jarke M.: Towards Reference Models for Requirements Traceability. To appear in: TSE (1999)
Roscheisen, M., Mogensen, C., Winograd, T.: Shared Web Annotations As A Platform for Third-Party Value-Added Information Providers: Architecture, Protocols, and Usage Examples. Technical Report (1994) http://www-diglib.stanford.edu/diglib/pub/reports/commentor.html
Roscheisen, M., Winograd, T., Paepcke A.: Content Ratings and Other Third-Party Value-Added Information-Definingan Enabling Platform. D-Lib Magazine (1995) http://mirrored.ukoln.ac.uk/lis-journals/dlib/dlib/dlib/august95/stanford/08roscheisen.html
Ryu, Y.U.: Specification of Contractual Obligations in Formal Business Communication. DKE 26(3): 309–326 (1998)
Schmidt, J.W., Schroder, G., Niederée, C., Matthes, F.: Linguistic and Architectural Requirements for Personalized Digital Libraries. Int. J. Digit. Libr. 1 (1997) 89–104
Warburg Electronic Library, http://www.sts.tu-harburg.de/projects/WEL
Winograd, T.: A Language/Action Perspective on the Design of Cooperative Work. Human-Computer Interaction 1 (1987-88) 3–30
Yu, E.S.K., Mylopoulos, J.: From E-R to “A-R” — ModellingS trategic Actor Relationships for Business Process Reengineering. ER 1994: 548–565
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 1999 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg
About this paper
Cite this paper
Schmidt, J.W., Sehring, HW. (1999). Dockets: A Model for Adding Value to Content. In: Akoka, J., Bouzeghoub, M., Comyn-Wattiau, I., Métais, E. (eds) Conceptual Modeling — ER ’99. ER 1999. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 1728. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-47866-3_17
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-47866-3_17
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg
Print ISBN: 978-3-540-66686-8
Online ISBN: 978-3-540-47866-9
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive