Skip to main content

A Constructive Approach to Parsing with Neural Networks — The Hybrid Connectionist Parsing Method

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Book cover Advances in Artificial Intelligence (Canadian AI 2002)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNAI,volume 2338))

  • 852 Accesses

Abstract

The concept of Dynamic Neural Networks (DNN) is a new approach within the Neural Network paradigm, which is based on the dynamic construction of Neural Networks during the processing of an input. The DNN methodology has been employed in the Hybrid Connectionist Parsing (HCP) approach, which comprises an incremental, on-line generation of a Neural Network parse tree. The HCP ensures an adequate representation and processing of recursively defined structures, like grammar-based languages. In this paper, we describe the general principles of the HCP method and some of its specific Neural Network features. We outline and discuss the use of the HCP method with respect to parallel processing of ambiguous structures, and robust parsing of extra-grammatical inputs in the context of spoken language parsing.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Elman, J. L. Finding Structure in Time. Cognitive Science, 1990, no 14, 179–211.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Reilly, R. andN. E. Sharkey (eds.) Connectionist Approaches to Languages, North-Holland, Amsterdam, 1988.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Reilly, R. and N. E. Sharkey (eds.) Connectionist Approaches to Natural Language Processing, Lawrence Erlbaum, Hillsdale, 1992.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Sharkey, N. Connectionist Natural Language Processing, intellect, Oxford, England, 1992.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Wermter, S. and V. Weber. SCREEN: Learning a Flat Syntactic and Semantic Spoken Language Analysis Using Artificial Neural Networks. Journal of Artificial Intelligence Research, vol 6, 1997, 35–85.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Jain, A. N. A Connectionist Architecture for Sequential Symbolic Domains. Technical Report CMU-CS-89-187, School of Computer Science, Carnegie Mellon University, 1989.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Jain, A. N. and A. H. Waibel. Incremental Parsing by Modular Recurrent Connectionist Networks. In D. S. Touretzky (ed.): Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems 2, Morgan Kaufmann, San Mateo, CA, 1990.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Kempen, G. and T. Vosse. Incremental syntactic tree formation in human sentence processing: A cognitive architecture based on activation decay and simulated annealing, Connection Science, Vol. 1, 1989, 273–290.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Vosse, T. and G. Kempen. Syntactic structure assembly in human parsing: A computational model based on competitive inhibition and a lexicalist grammar, Cognition (75) 2000, 105–143.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Qing Ma, Kiyotaka Uchimoto, Masaki Murata and Hitoshi Isahara. Elastic Neural Networks for Part of Speech Tagging, IJCNN-99.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Pollack, J. B. On Connectionist Models of Natural Language Processing. Technical Report MCCS-87-100, Computing Research Laboratory, New Mexico State University, 1987.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Waltz, D.L. and Pollack, J.B. Massively Parallel Parsing: A Strongly Interactive Model of Natural Language Interpretation. Cognitive Science, 1985 (9:1), 51–74.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Kemke, C. Parsing Neural Networks-Combining Symbolic and Connectionist Approaches. Proc. International Conference on Neural Information Processing ICONIP’94, Seoul, Korea, October 1994. Also TR-94-021, ICSI, Berkeley, CA, 1994.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Kemke, C. A Hybrid Approach to Natural Language Parsing, von der Malsburg, von Seelen, Vorbrueggen, Sendhoff (Eds.): Artificial Neural Networks, 875–880.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Schommer, C. PAPADEUS-Ein inkrementeller konnektionistischer Parser mit einer parallelen Disambiguierungskomponente (PAPADEUS—An Incremental Connectionist Parser with a Disambiguation Component). Master’s Thesis, Computer Science Department, University of the Saarland, 1993

    Google Scholar 

  16. Kemke, C. and C. Schommer. PAPADEUS-Parallel Parsing of Ambiguous Sentences, Proc. World Congress on Neural Networks, Portland, Oregon, 1993, Vol. 3, 79–82

    Google Scholar 

  17. Kone, H. INKOPA-Ein inkrementeller konnektionistischer Parser flier natuerliche Sprache (INKOPA-an Incremental Connectionist Parser for Natural Language). Master’s Thesis, Computer Science Department, University of the Saarland, 1993

    Google Scholar 

  18. Kemke, C. and H. Kone. INCOPA-An Incremental Connectionist Parser. Proc. World Congress on Neural Networks, Portland, Oregon, 1993, Vol. 3, 41–44

    Google Scholar 

  19. Kemke, C. Konnektionistische Modelle in der Sprachverarbeitung (Connectionist Models for Speech and Language Processing), Cuvillier-Verlag, Goettingen, Germany, 2000.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Kemke, C. Connectionist Parsing with Dynamic Neural Networks — or: “Can Neural Networks make Chomsky Happy?” Technical Report, Computing Research Laboratory CRL, New Mexico State University, 2001.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Jurafsky, D. and J. H. Martin. Speech and Language Processing, Prentice-Hall, 2000.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Hindle, D.: Deterministic Parsing of Syntactic Non-Fluencies. In ACL-83, Cambridge, MA, 123–28.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Heeman, Peter A., Kyung-ho Loken-Kim and James F. Allen. Combining the detection and correction of speech repairs. ICSLP-96.

    Google Scholar 

  24. Hemphill, Charles T., John J. Godfrey and George R. Doddington. The ATIS Spoken Language Systems Pilot Corpus. Proc. Of the Speech and Natural Language Workshop, Hidden Valley, PA, 1990, pp. 96–101.

    Google Scholar 

  25. Bear, J., J. Dowding and E. Shriberg. Integrating Multiple Knowledge Sources for Detection and Correction of repairs in Human-Computer DialogProc. Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics, Delaware, 28 June-2 July, 56–63.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2002 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Kemke, C. (2002). A Constructive Approach to Parsing with Neural Networks — The Hybrid Connectionist Parsing Method. In: Cohen, R., Spencer, B. (eds) Advances in Artificial Intelligence. Canadian AI 2002. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 2338. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-47922-8_26

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-47922-8_26

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-43724-6

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-540-47922-2

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics