Skip to main content

Validation and Reparation of Knowledge Bases

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNAI,volume 2366))

Abstract

Two properties characterize the quality of a knowledge base (KB): coherency and completeness. In our work, the completeness of the KB is evaluated on a set of test cases. The incompleteness is revealed by test cases that cannot be proved, called deficiencies. We also use test cases to check the coherency of the KB: we propose a new notion, called C_coherency, that extends previous definitions of coherency. The situations that reveal the C_incoherency of the KB are called conflicts. When the problems in a KB have been identified, our aim is to restore the validity of this base. For each conflict and each deficiency, we determine which modifications of the KB can suppress this problem without introducing new deficiencies or conflicts in the KB.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Beauvieux A, Dague P. A General Consistency checking and restoring Engine for Knowledge Bases, ECAI, p. 77–82, 1990.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Boswell R., Craw S. Organising Knowledge refinement operators. In Proc of EUROVAV. p. 149–161. Kluwer Academic Publishers. 1999.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Bouali F, Loiseau S, Rousset MC. Rule Base Debugging, ITCAI, p. 166–169, 1996.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Bouali F, Loiseau S, Rousset MC. Revision of rule base, EUROVAV, p. 193–203, 1997.

    Google Scholar 

  5. De Kleer J. An assumption-based truth maintenance system, AI. 28, p. 127–224, 1986.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Ginsberg A. Knowledge-base reduction: a new approach to checking knowledge bases for inconsistency and redundancy, AAAI, p. 585–589, 1988.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Loiseau S. Refinement of KB based on Consistency, ECAI, p. 845–849, 1992.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Mooney R.J, Ourston D. A multistrategy approach to theory refinement, Machine Learning. Vol IV, p. 141–164, 1994.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Nguyen T.A., Perkins W.A., Laffey T.J., Pecora D. Checking an expert system knowledge base for consistency and completeness, IJCAI, p. 375–3791985.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Preece A.D, Talbot S, Vignollet L, Evaluation of verification tools for knowledge-based systems; Int. J. Human-Computer Studies 47 p. 629–658 1997.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Rousset MC. On the consistency of KB: the COVADIS system, ECAI, p. 79–84, 1988.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2002 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Djelouah, R., Duval, B., Loiseau, S. (2002). Validation and Reparation of Knowledge Bases. In: Hacid, MS., Raś, Z.W., Zighed, D.A., Kodratoff, Y. (eds) Foundations of Intelligent Systems. ISMIS 2002. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 2366. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-48050-1_35

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-48050-1_35

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-43785-7

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-540-48050-1

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics