Skip to main content

Logic—Based Choice of Projective Terms

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNAI,volume 1701))

Abstract

Lexical choice is the problem of determining what words to use for the concepts in the domain representation. In this paper, we offer a model of the choice of projective terms such as vor, davor, vorn etc. that is based on abductive reasoning. After a motivation for the need to treat these lexical items as candidates for lexical choice, we outline the semantic and pragmatic conditions for their use.We present an abductive proof method that allows us to collect these conditions. Sets of collected conditions can be mapped unambiguously to corresponding projective items.

This research was supported by a grant from the Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (DFG) which is gratefully acknowledged.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Cahill, L. (1998) Lexicalisation in applied NLG systems. Brighton/ Edinburgh; 1st deliverable of the RAGS project. Available at http://www.itri.brighton.ac.uk/projects/rags/.

  2. Cahill, L. & Reape, M. (1998) Component tasks in applied NLG systems. Brighton/Edinburgh; 2nd deliverable of the RAGS project. Available at http://www.itri.brighton.ac.uk/projects/rags/.

  3. Carroll, M. (1997) Changing place in English and German: language—specific preferences in the conceptualization of spatial relations. In: J. Nuyts & E. Pederson (eds.) Language and Conceptualization.. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 137–161.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Eschenbach, C.; Habel, C. & Leßmöllmann, A. (in press) Multiple frames of reference in interpreting complex projective terms. To appear in: P. Olivier (ed.) Spatial Language. Cognitive and Computational Aspects. Dordrecht: Kluwer.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Gapp, K.-P. (1994) From Vision to Language: A Cognitive Approach to the Computation of Spatial Relations in 3D Space. In: Proceedings of the 1st European Conference on Cognitive Science in Industry. Luxembourg; 339–358.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Gapp, K.-P. (1997) Objektlokalisation. Wiesbaden: Deutscher Universitätsverlag.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Herskovits, A. (1986) Language and Spatial Cognition: An Interdisciplinary Study of the Prepositions in English. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Hobbs, J. R., M. E. Stickel, D. E. Appelt & P. Martin (1993) Interpretation as abduction. Artificial Intelligence 63, 69-142.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Lambrecht, K. (1994) Information Structure and Sentence Form. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Lascarides, A. & Oberlander, J. (1992) Abducing temporal discourse. In: R. Dale, E. Hovy, D. Rösner, and O. Stock (eds), Aspects of Automated Natural Language Generation, Berlin: Springer, 167–182.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Klabunde, R. (in press) Semantik und Pragmatik dimensionaler Adverbien. To appear in: C. Habel & C. von Stutterheim (eds.) Sprache und Raum. Tübingen: Niemeyer.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Klabunde, R. & Jansche, M. (1998) Abductive Reasoning for Syntactic Realization. Proceedings of the 9th International Workshop on Natural Language Generation. Niagara—on—the—Lake, Ontario, Canada; 108–117.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Mayer, M. C., & Pirri, F. (1996) A study on the logic of abduction. In: W. Wahlster (ed), Proceedings of the 12th European Conference on Artificial Intelligence (ECAI 96), Chichester: Wiley, 18–22.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Patten, T. (1988) Systemic text generation as problem solving. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  15. Reiter, E. (1990) A New Model for Lexical Choice for Open—Class Words. Proceedings of the 5th International Natural Language Generation Workshop. Dawson, PA.; 23–30.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Stede, M. (1995) Lexicalization in Natural Language Generation: A Survey. Artificial Intelligence Review, 8; 309–336.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Stickel, M. E. (1990) Rationale and methods for abductive reasoning in natural language interpretation. In: R. Studer (ed), Natural Language and Logic, Berlin: Springer, 233–252.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Thomason, R. H., J. R. Hobbs, and J. D. Moore (1996) Communicative goals. In: K. Jokinen, M. Maybury, M. Zock, and I. Zukerman (eds), Proceedings of the ECAI 96 Workshop Gaps and Bridges: New Directions in Planning and Natural Language Generation, Budapest, 7–12.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Thomason, R. H., and J. R. Hobbs. 1997. Interrelating interpretation and generation in an abductive framework. Paper presented at the AAAI Fall 1997 Symposium on Communicative Action in Humans and Machines. Cambridge, MA.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Wazinski, P. (1992) Generating Spatial Descriptions for Cross—modal References. In: 3rd Conference on Applied Natural Language Processing. Trento; 56–63.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1999 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Klabunde, R. (1999). Logic—Based Choice of Projective Terms. In: Burgard, W., Cremers, A.B., Cristaller, T. (eds) KI-99: Advances in Artificial Intelligence. KI 1999. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 1701. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-48238-5_12

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-48238-5_12

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-66495-6

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-540-48238-3

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics