Skip to main content

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNCS,volume 1661))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

Spatial objects are located in regions of space. In this paper the notions of exact, part, and rough locations are discussed. Exact location is the relation between an object and the region of space it occupies. The notion of part location characterizes the location of a spatial object within a set of regions which form a regional partition of space. It links parts of spatial objects to parts of partition elements. The relationship between rough location, vague defined spatial objects, and indeterminacy of location are discussed. Knowledge about location of spatial objects in physical reality is based on observations and measurement. This paper argues that the observations and measurement of locationin physical reality yiel knowledgeabout rough location rather than knowledge about exact location. The underlying regional partitions are created by the observation and measurement processes.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Abler, R, Marcus, M. & Olson, J. M., eds (1992), Geographer’s Worlds, Rutgers University Press New Brunswick, New Jersey.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bittner, T. (1997), A qualitative coordinate language of locations ofdO. Stock ed., ‘Bolzano International Schools in Philosophy and Artificial Intelligence: Spatial Reasoning’, Bolzano, Italy; March, 1995.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bittner, T. (1999), Rough Location, Phd., Technical University Vienna, Department of Geoinformation.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bittner, T. & Stell, J. G. (1998), ‘A boundary-sensitive approach to a qualitative location’, Annals of Mathematics and Artificial Intelligence 24, 93–114.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carnap, R. (1966), an Introduction to the Philosophy of Science, Dover Publications, INC., New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Casati, R. & Varzi, A. (1995), ‘the structure of spatial location’, Philosopical Studies 82(2), 205–239.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Casati, R. & Varzi, A. (1997), Spatial Entities, in O. Stock ed., ‘Bolzano International Schools in Philosophy and Artificial Intelligence: Spatial Reasoning’, Bolzano, Italy; March 13-17, 1995.

    Google Scholar 

  • Casati, R. & Varzi, A. C. (1994) Holes and Other superficialities, MIT Press, Cambridge, Mass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cohn, A. & Gotts, N. (1996), The ‘egg-yolk’ representation of regions with indeterminate boundaries, in P. Burrough & A. Frank, eds, ‘Geographic Objects with Indeterminate Boundaries’, GISDATA Series II, Taylor and Francis, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Couclelis, H. (1992), Location, place, region, and space, in R.F. Abler, M.G. Marcus & J.M. Olson, eds, ‘Geographer’s Inner World’, Rutgers University Press, new Bruinswick, New Jersey.

    Google Scholar 

  • Frank, A. U. (1997). spatial ontology: A geographical point of view, in O. Stock, ed., ‘Spatial and Temporal Reasoning’, Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht, The Nertherlands, pp. 135–153.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Freudschuh, S. & Egenhofer, M. (1997), ‘Human conceptions of space: Implications for gis’, Transaction in GIS.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gerstl, P. & Pribbenow, S. (1995), ‘Midwinters, end games, and body parts: a classification of part-whole relations’, Int. J. Human-Computer studies 43, 865–889.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hernandez, D. (1994), Qualitative Spatial Resoning, Springer Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • Herskovits, A. (1986), Language and Spatial Cognition-An Interdisciplinary Study of the Proposition in English, Studies in natural language processing, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge [Cambridgeshire]; New york.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jaenich, K. (1994), Topologie, Springer, Berlin.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Leonard, H. & Goodman, N. (1940), ‘The calculus of individuals and its uses’, Journal of Symbolic Logic 5, 45–55.

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Lesniewski, S. (1929), ‘Grundzuege eines neuen systems der grundlagen der mathematic’, Fundamenta Mathematicae 14, 1–81.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Lynch, K. (1960), The Image of the City, MIT Press, Cambridge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mark, D. & Frank, A. (1995), ‘Experiential and formal models of geographic space’, Environment and Planning B 23, 3–24.

    Google Scholar 

  • Medak, D. (1999), Lifestyles-A new Paradigm in Spatio-Temporal Databases, Ph.d., Technical University Vienna, Department of Geoinformation.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moffitt, F. & Bouchard, H. (1987), surveying, Harper & Row, Publishers, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pawlak, Z. (1982), ‘Rough sets’, Internat. J. Comput. Inform 11, 341–356.

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Randell, D. A., Cui, Z. & Cohn, A. G. (1992), A spatial logic based on regions and connection, in ‘3rd Int. conference on Knowledge Representation and Reasoning’, Boston.

    Google Scholar 

  • Simons, P. (1987), Parts, A Study on Ontology, Clarendon Press, Oxford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, B. (1997), Boundaries, an essay in metreology, in L. Hahn, ed., ‘the Philosophy of Roderick Crisholm’, Library of Living Philosophers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, B. & Mark, D. M. (1998), Ontology and geographic kinds, in ‘Proc. Int. Symposium on Spatial Data Handling, SDH’98’ Taylor and Francis, Vancouver.

    Google Scholar 

  • smith, B., ed. (1985), Foundations of Gestalt Theory, Philosophia, Munchen.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stevens, A. & Coupe, P. (1978), ‘Distortions in judged spatial relations’, Cognitive Psychology 10, 422–437.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Talmy, L. (1983), How language structures space, in H. Pick & L. Arcedelo, eds, ‘Spatial Orientation: Theory, Research, and Application’, Plenum Press, New York, NY.

    Google Scholar 

  • Worboys, M. F. (1998), ‘Computation with imprecise geospatial data’, Computers, Environment and Urban Systems.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1999 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Bittner, T. (1999). On Ontology and Epistemology of Rough Location. In: Freksa, C., Mark, D.M. (eds) Spatial Information Theory. Cognitive and Computational Foundations of Geographic Information Science. COSIT 1999. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 1661. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-48384-5_28

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-48384-5_28

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-66365-2

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-540-48384-7

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics