Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Basic Mental Attitudes of a Collaborating Agent: Cognitive Primitives for MAS

  • Conference paper
Book cover Multi-Agent System Engineering (MAAMAW 1999)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNAI,volume 1647))

Abstract

In this paper, we try to identify the relationships among three main (in our view) proposals of the basic mental attitudes in collaborative problem solving (the Toumela’s theory of acting together, in particular the notion of We-Intention; the Grosz and Kraus’ theory of collaboration, with special attention to the notion of Intention-that, and the Castelfranchi and Falcone’ theory of Delegation-Adoption). We show several overlaps, convergencies, but also complementarities, contradictions and competitions among these theories. The aim of this paper is some clarification and systematisation of the necessary mental attitudes in agents’ mind that characterise acting together and cooperating. We will not consider in this analysis other very important mental ingredients of complex forms of collaboration, like agents’ motivations in taking part in collective activity, trust, and normative components: permissions, rights, norms, roles, etc.

We would like to thank Maria Miceli and Frank Dignum for their comments. A special thank to Raimo Tuomela for his patient (although perhaps not completely successful) explanations. This research has been developed within the agreement between CNR and Provincia Autonoma di Trento, research project on “Applicazioni avanzate di informatica”.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. [Cannon-Bowers et al., 93] Cannon-Bowers, J.A., Salas, E. and Converse, S. (1993) Shared mental models in expert team decision making. In M.J. Castellan (ed.) Individual and group decision making, Hillsdale, Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  2. [Castelfranchi, 98] C. Castelfranchi, (1998), Modelling Social Action for AI Agents, Artificial Intelligence, 103, pp. 157–182.

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  3. [Castelfranchi, 91] C. Castelfranchi, (1991) Social Power: a missed point in DAI, MA and HCI. In Decentralized AI. Y. Demazeau & J.P. Mueller (eds), Elsevier, Amsterdam, 49–62.

    Google Scholar 

  4. [Castelfranchi, 97] C. Castelfranchi, (1997) Principles of Individual Social Action. In Tuomela R., & Hintikka, G. (eds.) Contemporary Action Theory. Kluwer.

    Google Scholar 

  5. [Castelfranchi, 95] C. Castelfranchi, (1995), Commitment: from intentions to groups and organizations. In Proceedings of ICMAS’95, S. Francisco, AAAI-MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  6. [Castelfranchi&Falcone, 94] Castelfranchi, C., Falcone, R. (1994), Towards a theory of single-agent into multi-agent plan transformation. The 3rd Pacific Rim International Conference on Artificial Intelligence, Beijing, China, 16–18 agosto.

    Google Scholar 

  7. [Castelfranchi&Falcone, 98] Castelfranchi, C., Falcone, R., Towards a Theory of Delegation for Agent-based Systems, Robotics and Autonomous Systems, Special issue on Multi-Agent Rationality, Elsevier Editor. Vol 24, Nos 3–4, pp. 141–157.

    Google Scholar 

  8. [Cohen&Levesque, 90] Cohen, P.R. & Levesque H. J., (1990), Intention is choise with Commitment. Artificial Intelligence, 42, pp. 213–61.

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  9. [Miceli et al., 95] M Miceli, Cesta A., and P Rizzo (1995) Distributed Artificial Intelligence from a socio-cognitive standpoint: Looking at reasons for interaction,. AI & Society, 9,287–320.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. [Conte&Castelfranchi, 95] R. Conte & C. Castelfranchi, Cognitive and Social Action (UCL Press, London, 1995).

    Google Scholar 

  11. [Conte et al., 91] Conte, R., Miceli, M. C. Castelfranchi. (1991), Limits and levels of cooperation. Disentangling various types of prosocial interaction. In Decentralized AI-2, Y. Demazeau, J.P. Mueller (eds), 147–157. Amsterdam: Elsevier.

    Google Scholar 

  12. [Demazeau&Mueller, 90] Demazeau, Y. & J.P. Mueller (eds) (1990). Decentralized AI. Amsterdam: Elsevier.

    Google Scholar 

  13. [Dunin-Keplicz&Verbrugge, 96] Dunin-Keplicz, B., and Verbrugge R., (1996) Collective Commitments, in M. Tokora (editor), Proceedings Second International Conference on Multi-Agent Systems, California AAAI-Press.

    Google Scholar 

  14. [Durfee et al., 87] Durfee, E.H., Lesser, V.R., Corkill, D.D. (1987) Cooperation through communication in a problem-solving network. In Distributed Artificial Intelligence, M.N. Huhns (ed.), 29–58. San Mateo, CA: Kaufmann.

    Google Scholar 

  15. [Falcone&Castelfranchi, 96] Falcone, R., Castelfranchi, C., (1996), Plan Recognition: from Single-Agent to Multi-Agent plans. in J. Perram & JP. Muller (eds.) Distributed Software Agents and Applications, Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence. Springer-Verlag pg.166–178.

    Google Scholar 

  16. [Ferber, 95] J. Ferber. Les Systemes Multi-Agents. InterEditions, Paris, 1995.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  17. [Gasser, 91] Gasser, L. (1991). Social conceptions of knowledge and action: DAI foundations and open systems semantics. Artificial Intelligence, 47, 107–38.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  18. [Grosz, 96] B. Grosz, Collaborative Systems. AI Magazine (summer 1996) 67–85.

    Google Scholar 

  19. [Grosz&Kraus, 96] Grosz B., and Kraus S. (1996), Collaborative Plans for Complex Group Action, Artificial Intelligence, 86, pp. 269–357.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  20. [Grosz&Sidner, 90] Grosz B., and Sidner S. (1996), Plans for Discourse. In: Cohen P., Morgan J.L., and Pollack M.E. eds., Intentions in Communication (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA).

    Google Scholar 

  21. [Jennings, 93] Jennings. N.R. (1993). Commitments and conventions: The foundation of coordination in multi-agent systems. The Knowledge Engineering Review, 3, 223–50.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. [Haddadi, 96] A. Haddadi, Communication and Cooperation in Agent Systems (the Springer Press, 1996).

    Google Scholar 

  23. [Levesque et al., 90] H.J. Levesque, P.R. Cohen, Nunes J.H.T. On acting together. In Proceedings of the 8th National Conference on Artificial Intelligence, 94–100. San Marco, California: Kaufmann. 1990.

    Google Scholar 

  24. [Malone et al., 88] Malone T.W., Fikes R.E. and Howard M.T., (1988), Enterpise: a market-like task scheduler for distributed computing environments, in: Huberman B. A. ed. The Ecology of Computation (North-Holland, Amsterdam), 177–205.

    Google Scholar 

  25. [O’Hare&Jennings, 96] O’Hare G. and Jennings N., (1996) Foundations of distributed Artificial Intelligence. Wiley & Sons.

    Google Scholar 

  26. [Pollack, 90] Pollack, M., (1990) Plans as complex mental attitudes in Cohen, P.R., Morgan, J. and Pollack, M.E. (eds), Intentions in Communication, MIT press, USA, pp. 77–103.

    Google Scholar 

  27. [Rao et al., 92] Rao, A. S., Georgeff, M.P., & Sonenberg E.A., (1992). Social plans: A preliminary report. In Decentralized AI-3, E. Werner & Y, Demazeau (eds.), 57–77. Amsterdam: Elsevier.

    Google Scholar 

  28. [Searle, 90] Searle J.R., (1990), Collective Intentions and Actions. In: Cohen P., Morgan J.L., and Pollack M.E. eds., Intentions in Communication (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA) Chapter 19.

    Google Scholar 

  29. [Sichman et al., 94] Sichman, J, R. Conte, C. Castelfranchi, Y. Demazeau. (1994), A social reasoning mechanism based on dependence networks. In Proceedings of the 11th ECAI.

    Google Scholar 

  30. [Singh, 95] M.P. Singh, (1995) Multiagent Systems: A Theoretical Framework for Intentions, Know-how, and Communications. Springer Verlag, LNCS, volume 799.

    Google Scholar 

  31. [Tuomela, 84] Tuomela, R. (1984) A Theory of Social Action, Reidel Pub., Boston.

    Google Scholar 

  32. [Tuomela, 98] Tuomela, R. (1998) Collective And Joint Intention (Forthcoming in the proceedings of the Rosselli Foundation conference “Cognitive Theory of Social Action” held in Turin, June 1998)

    Google Scholar 

  33. [Tuomela&Bonnevier, 97] Tuomela, R. and Bonnevier-Tuomela, M. (1997) From Social Imitation to Teamwork. In Holmstrom-Hintikka, G. and Tuomela, R. (Eds.) Contemporary Action Theory. Vol. II: Social Action. Kluwer, Boston.

    Google Scholar 

  34. [Tuomela&Miller, 88] Tuomela, R. and Miller, K. (1988) ‘We-Intentions’. Philosophical Studies, 53, 115–37.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. [Von Martial, 92] Von Martial F., (1992) Coordinating Plans of Autonomous Agents. LNAI 610, Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  36. [Weiss&Sen, 98] Weiss, G. and Sen, S, (eds.) (1998) Multi Agent Systems-A modern Approach to Distributed Artificial Intelligence. AAAI/MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  37. [Werner, 89] Werner, E. (1989), Cooperating agents: A unified theory of communication and social structure. In Distributed artificial intelligence, Vol. 2, M. Huhns, L. Gasser (eds), 3–36. London: Kaufmann and Pitman.

    Google Scholar 

  38. [Werner, 90] Werner, E. (1990), What can agents do together? A semantics for reasoning about cooperative ability. Proceedings of the 9th European Conference on Artificial Intelligence. London: Pitman.

    Google Scholar 

  39. [Wooldridge&Jennings, 94] Wooldridge M. and Jennings N., (1994), Formalizing the cooperative problem solving process, in: Proceedings 13th International Workshop on Distributed Intelligence, Lake Quinalt, WA, 403–417.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Division of “Artificial Intelligence, Cognitive and Interaction Modelling”, National Research Council - Institute of Psychology, Italy

    Cristiano Castelfranchi & Rino Falcone

Authors
  1. Cristiano Castelfranchi
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Rino Falcone
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. Telefónica Investigatión y Desarrollo, C/Emilio Vargas 6, E-28043, Madrid, Spain

    Francisco J. Garijo

  2. DSV, SU/KTH, Electrum 230, SE-16440, Kista, Sweden

    Magnus Boman

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1999 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Castelfranchi, C., Falcone, R. (1999). Basic Mental Attitudes of a Collaborating Agent: Cognitive Primitives for MAS. In: Garijo, F.J., Boman, M. (eds) Multi-Agent System Engineering. MAAMAW 1999. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 1647. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-48437-X_16

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-48437-X_16

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-66281-5

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-540-48437-0

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation