Skip to main content

Theory Recovery

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Book cover Inductive Logic Programming (ILP 1999)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNAI,volume 1634))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

In this paper we examine the problem of repairing incomplete background knowledge using Theory Recovery. Repeat Learning under ILP considers the problem of updating background knowledge in order to progressively increase the performance of an ILP algorithm as it tackles a sequence of related learning problems. Theory recovery is suggested as a suitable mechanism. A bound is derived for the performance of theory recovery in terms of the information content of the missing predicate definitions. Experiments are described that use the logical back-propagation ability of Progol 5.0 to perform theory recovery. The experimental results are consistent with the derived bound.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. K. M. Khan, S. H. Muggleton, and R. D. G. Parson. Repeat learning using predicate invention. In David Page, editor, Proceedings of the Eighth International Conference on Inductive Logic Programming, volume 1446 of LNAI, pages 165–174, Madison, Wisconsin, USA, 1998. Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  2. S. Moyle and S. H. Muggleton. Learning programs in the event calculus. In Nada Lavrač and Sašo Džeroski, editors, Proceedings of the Seventh International Conference on Inductive Logic Programming, volume 1297 of LNAI, pages 205–212, Prague, Czech Republic, September 1997. Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  3. S. H. Muggleton. Inverse entailment and progol. New Generation Computing, 13:245–286, 1995.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. S. H. Muggleton. Learning from positive data. In Proceedings of the Sixth Workshop on Inductive Logic Programming, Stockholm, 1996.

    Google Scholar 

  5. S. H. Muggleton and C. D. Page. A learnability model for universal representations. Technical report, Oxford University Computing Laboratory, Oxford, UK, 1997.

    Google Scholar 

  6. S. H. Muggleton and L. De Raedt. Inductive logic programming: theory and methods. Journal of Logic Programming, 19,20:629–679, 1994.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. M. E. Stickel. A prolog technology theorem prover: a new exposition and implementation in prolo. Theoretical Computer Science, 104(1):109–128, 1992.

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  8. D. Welsh. Codes and Cryptography. Oxford Science Publications. Oxford University Press, 1989.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1999 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Parson, R., Khan, K., Muggleton, S. (1999). Theory Recovery. In: Džeroski, S., Flach, P. (eds) Inductive Logic Programming. ILP 1999. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 1634. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-48751-4_24

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-48751-4_24

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-66109-2

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-540-48751-7

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics