Skip to main content

On the Multiple Gene Duplication Problem

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNCS,volume 1533))

Abstract

A fundamental problem in computational biology is the determination of the correct species tree for a set of taxa given a set of (possibly contradictory) gene trees. In recent literature, the Duplication/ Loss model has received considerable attention. Here one measures the similarity/dissimilarity between a set of gene trees by counting the number of paralogous gene duplications and subsequent gene losses which need to be postulated in order to explain (in an evolutionarily meaningful way) how the gene trees could have arisen with respect to the species tree. Here we count the number of multiple gene duplication events (duplication events in the genome of the organism involving one or more genes) without regard to gene losses. Multiple Gene Duplication asks to find the species tree Swhich requires the fewest number of multiple gene duplication events to be postulated in order to explain a set of gene trees G1, G2, ..., Gk. We also examine the related problem which assumes the species tree S is known and asks to find the explanation for G1, G2, ..., Gk requiring the fewest multiple gene duplications. Via a reduction to and from a combinatorial model we call the Ball and Trap Game, we show that the general form of this problem is NP-hard and various parameterized versions are hard for the complexity class W[1]. These results immediately imply that Multiple Gene Duplication is similarily hard. We prove that several parameterized variants are in FPT.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. K. R. Abrahamson and M. R. Fellows. Finite automata, bounded treewidth and well-quasiordering. In Graph Structure Theory, Contemporary Mathematics vol. 147, pp. 539–564. AMS, 1993.

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  2. S. Benner and A. Ellington. Evolution and Structural Theory. The frontier between chemistry and biochemistry. Bioorg. Chem. Frontiers 1 1990, 1–70.

    Google Scholar 

  3. R. G. Downey and M. R. Fellows. Parameterized Complexity, Springer, 1998.

    Google Scholar 

  4. R. Downey, M. Fellows, and U. Stege. “Parameterized Complexity: A Framework for Systematically Confronting Parameterized Complexity,” in The Future of Discr. Mathem.: Proc. of the 1st DIMATIA Symp., Czech Republic, June 1997, Roberts, Kratochvil, Neŝetril (eds.), AMS-DIMACS Proc. Ser. 1998, to appear.

    Google Scholar 

  5. J. Felsenstein. Phylogenies from Molecular Sequences: Inference and Reliability. Annu. Rev. Genet. 1988, 22, 521–65.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. M. Fellows, M. Hallett, C. Korostensky, and U. Stege. “Analogs & Duals of the MAST Problem for Sequences & Trees,” ESA 98, to appear.

    Google Scholar 

  7. W. Fitch, E. Margoliash. “Construction of Phylogenetic Tree,” Sci. 155 1967.

    Google Scholar 

  8. M. Goodman, J. Czelusniak, G. Moore, A. Romero-Herrera, G. Matsuda. “Fitting the Gene Lineage into its Species Lineage: A parsimony strategy illustrated by cladograms constructed from globin sequences,” Syst. Zool. 1979, 28.

    Google Scholar 

  9. R. Guiǵo, I. Muchnik, and T. F. Smith. “Reconstruction of Ancient Molecular Phylogeny,” Molec. Phylogenet. and Evol. 1996, 6:2, 189–213.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. B. Ma, M. Li, and L. Zhang. “On Reconstructing Species Trees from Gene Trees in Term of Duplications and Losses,” Recomb 98.

    Google Scholar 

  11. J. Neigel and J. Avise. “Phylogenetic Relationship of mitochondrial DNA under various demographic models of speciation,” Evol. Proc. and Th. 1986, 515–534.

    Google Scholar 

  12. R. D. M. Page. “Maps between trees and cladistic analysis of historical associations among genes, organisms, and areas,” Syst. Biol. 43 1994, 58–77.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. R. Page, M. Charleston. “From Gene to organismal phylogeny: reconciled trees and the gne tree/species tree problem,” Molec. Phyl. and Evol. 7 1997, 231–240.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. L. Zhang. “On a Mirkin-Muchnik-Smith Conjecture for Comparing Molecular Phylogenies,” J. of Comp. Biol. 1997 4:2, 177–187.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1998 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Fellows, M., Hallett, M., Stege, U. (1998). On the Multiple Gene Duplication Problem. In: Chwa, KY., Ibarra, O.H. (eds) Algorithms and Computation. ISAAC 1998. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 1533. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-49381-6_37

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-49381-6_37

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-65385-1

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-540-49381-5

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics