Skip to main content

Constraint Techniques for Solving the Protein Structure Prediction Problem

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNCS,volume 1520))

Abstract

The protein structure prediction problem is one of the most (if not the most) important problem in computational biology. This problem consists of finding the conformation of a protein (i.e., a sequence of amino-acids) with minimal energy. Because of the complexity of this problem, simplified models like Dill’s HP-lattice model [12] have become a major tool for investigating general properties of protein folding. Even for this simplified model, the structure prediction problem has been shown to be NP-complete [3, 5].

We describe a constraint formulation of the HP-model structure prediction problem, present the basic constraints and search strategy. We then introduce a novel, general technique for excluding geometrical symmetries in constraint programming. To our knowledge, this is the first general and declarative technique for excluding symmetries in constraint programming that can be added to an existing implementation. Finally, we describe a new lower bound on the energy of an HP-protein. Both techniques yield an efficient pruning of the search tree.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. V. I. Abkevich, A. M. Gutin, and E. I. Shakhnovich. Impact of local and nonlocal interactions on thermodynamics and kinetics of protein folding. Journal of Molecular Biology, 252:460–471, 1995.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. V.I. Abkevich, A.M. Gutin, and E.I. Shakhnovich. Computer simulations of prebiotic evolution. In Russ B. Altman, A. Keith Dunker, Lawrence Hunter, and Teri E. Klein, editors, PSB’97, pages 27–38, 1997.

    Google Scholar 

  3. B. Berger and T. Leighton. Protein folding in the hydrophobic-hydrophilic (HP) modell is NP-complete. In Proc. of the RECOMB’98, pages 30–39, 1998.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Erich Bornberg-Bauer. Chain growth algorithms for HP-type lattice proteins. In Proc. of the 1 st Annual International Conference on Computational Molecular Biology (RECOMB), pages 47–55. ACM Press, 1997.

    Google Scholar 

  5. P. Crescenzi, D. Goldman, C. Papadimitriou, A. Piccolboni, and M. Yannakakis. On the complexity of protein folding. In Proc. of STOC, 1998. To appear. Short version in Proc. of RECOMB’98, pages 61–62.

    Google Scholar 

  6. K.A. Dill, S. Bromberg, K. Yue, K.M. Fiebig, D.P. Yee, P.D. Thomas, and H.S. Chan. Principles of protein folding-a perspective of simple exact models. Protein Science, 4:561–602, 1995.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Ken A. Dill, Klaus M. Fiebig, and Hue Sun Chan. Cooperativity in protein-folding kinetics. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 90:1942–1946, 1993.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Aaron R. Dinner, Andreaj šali, and Martin Karplus. The folding mechanism of larger model proteins: Role of native structure. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 93:8356–8361, 1996.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. S. Govindarajan and R. A. Goldstein. The foldability landscape of model proteins. Biopolymers, 42(4):427–438, 1997.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. William E. Hart and Sorin C. Istrail. Fast protein folding in the hydrophobid-hydrophilic model within three-eighths of optimal. Journal of omputational Biology, 3(1):53–96, 1996.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. David A. Hinds and Michael Levitt. From structure to sequence and back again. Journal of Molecular Biology, 258:201–209, 1996.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Kit Fun Lau and Ken A. Dill. A lattice statistical mechanics model of the conformational and sequence spaces of proteins. Macromolecules, 22:3986–3997, 1989.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Angel R. Ortiz, Andrzej Kolinski, and Jeffrey Skolnick. Combined multiple sequence reduced protein model approach to predict the tertiary structure of small proteins. In Russ B. Altman, A. Keith Dunker, Lawrence Hunter, and Teri E. Klein, editors, PSB’98, volume 3, pages 375–386, 1998.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Gert Smolka. The Oz programming model. In Jan van Leeuwen, editor, Computer Science Today, Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol. 1000, pages 324–343. Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 1995.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  15. R. Unger and J. Moult. Genetic algorithms for protein folding simulations. Journal of Molecular Biology, 231:75–81, 1993.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Ron Unger and John Moult. Local interactions dominate folding in a simple protein model. Journal of Molecular Biology, 259:988–994, 1996.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. A. šali, E. Shakhnovich, and M. Karplus. Kinetics of protein folding. Journal of Molecular Biology, 235:1614–1636, 1994.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Kaizhi Yue and Ken A. Dill. Sequence-structure relationships in proteins and copolymers. Physical Review E, 48(3):2267–2278, September 1993.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Kaizhi Yue and Ken A. Dill. Forces of tertiary structural organization in globular proteins. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 92:146–150, 1995.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1998 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Backofen, R. (1998). Constraint Techniques for Solving the Protein Structure Prediction Problem. In: Maher, M., Puget, JF. (eds) Principles and Practice of Constraint Programming — CP98. CP 1998. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 1520. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-49481-2_7

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-49481-2_7

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-65224-3

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-540-49481-2

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics