Skip to main content

Padding, commitment and self-reducibility

  • Session 7 Complexity
  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Foundations of Software Technology and Theoretical Computer Science (FSTTCS 1988)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNCS,volume 338))

  • 143 Accesses

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

7. References

  1. Arvind, V., On some structural properties of NP, Ph. D. thesis, I.I.T. Kanpur, 1987.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Arvind, V. and Biswas, S., Kernel constructible languages, Proc. of the 3rd FST & TCS conference, 1983.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Balcázar, J. L., Self-reducibility, Proc. 4th STACS, Lect. Notes in Comp. Sc., Vol. 247, pp. 136–147, 1987.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Berman, P., Relationships between density and deterministic complexity of NP-complete languages, Proc. 5th ICALP, Lect. Notes in Comp. Sc., vol. 62, pp. 63–71, 1978.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Berman, L. and Hartmanis, J., On isomorphism and density of NP and other complete sets, SIAM Journal of Computing 6, pp. 305–322, 1977.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Fortune, S., A note on sparse complete sets, SIAM Jl. Comput. vol. 8, pp. 431–433, 1979.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Joseph, D. and Young, P., Some remarks on witness functions for nonpolynomial and noncomplete sets in NP, Theor. C. Sc., vol. 39, pp. 225–237, 1985.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Ko, Ker-I, On helping by robust oracle machines, Theor. Comp. Sc., vol. 52, pp. 15–36, 1987.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Mahaney, S., Sparse complete sets for NP: solution of a conjecture of Berman and Hartmanis, Proc. 21st IEEE Symp. on FOCS, pp. 54–60, 1980. Final version in Jl. of Comp. Syst. Sc., vol. 25, pp. 130–143, 1982.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Meyer, A. R. and Paterson, M. S., With what frequency are apparently intractable problems difficult?, Tech. Report, MIT/LCS/TM-126, 1979.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Mahaney, S. and Young, P., Orderings of polynomial isomorphism types, Theor. Comput. Sc., 39(2), pp. 207–224, 1985.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Schnorr, C.P., On self-transformable combinatorial problems, Math. Programming Study, Vol. 14, pp. 95–103, 1982.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Selman, A., P-selective sets, tally languages, and the behavior of polynomial time reducibilities on NP, Math. Syst. Theory, 13, pp. 55–65, 1979.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Selman, A., Natural self-reducible sets, preprint, 1986.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Kesav V. Nori Sanjeev Kumar

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1988 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Khadilkar, S.N., Biswas, S. (1988). Padding, commitment and self-reducibility. In: Nori, K.V., Kumar, S. (eds) Foundations of Software Technology and Theoretical Computer Science. FSTTCS 1988. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 338. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-50517-2_82

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-50517-2_82

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-50517-4

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-540-46030-5

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics