Skip to main content

Deciding Horn classes by hyperresolution

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
CSL '89 (CSL 1989)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNCS,volume 440))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

It is shown that positive hyperresolution can be used as decision procedure for solvable classes of Horn clause sets. Rather than by quantifier prefixes or by propositional features these classes are characterized by variable occurrence — and term depth properties. Special attention is given to a subclass of the Horn clause implication problem, which can be represented as consistency problem; to decide ∀C→∀D, ( ∀C denotes the universal closoure of C, C is a Horn clause, D is an arbitrary clause ) we apply hyperresolution to the clause form of ∀C∧⌍∀D. Special techniques can be used in handling such implication clause forms, because there is only one rule, ground unit facts and ground unit goals. The sharp boundary between solvable and unsolvable classes is illustrated, and a complexity analysis of some classes is given.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. C. L. Chang & R. C. T. Lee: Symbolic Logic and Mechanical Theorem Proving, Academic Press 1973.

    Google Scholar 

  2. B. Dreben & W. D. Goldfarb: The Decision Problem — Solvable Classes of Quantificational Formulas, Addison Wesley 1979.

    Google Scholar 

  3. C.Fermüller: Deciding some Horn Clause Sets by Resolution, to appear in the Yearbook of the Kurt Gödel Society 1989.

    Google Scholar 

  4. M. R. Garey & D. S. Johnson: Computers and Intractability; Freeman & Comp., San Francisco, 1979.

    Google Scholar 

  5. G. Gottlob: Subsumption and Implication, Information Processing Letters 24 (1987), 109–111.

    Google Scholar 

  6. W. H. Joyner jr.: Resolution Strategies as Decision Procedures, JACM Vol 23 No. 3, (July 1976), 398–417.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. A. Leitsch: Implication Algorithms for Classes of Horn Clauses, Statistik, Informatik + Oekonomie, Springer Verl. Berlin, Heidelberg, 1988, 172–189.

    Google Scholar 

  8. A.Leitsch, G.Gottlob: Deciding Horn Clause Implication by Ordered Semantic Resolution, to appear in Proc. Intern. Symp. Computational Intelligence 89, Elsevier 1989.

    Google Scholar 

  9. H.R. Lewis: Unsolvable Classes of Quantificational Formulas, Addison Wesley 1979.

    Google Scholar 

  10. D. Loveland: Automated Theorem Proving — A Logical Basis, North Holland Publ. Comp. 1978.

    Google Scholar 

  11. A. Martelli, U. Montanari: An Efficient Unification Algorithm, ACM Transactions on Programming Languages and Systems, Vol. 4 No. 2, (April 1982).

    Google Scholar 

  12. J. Siekmann: Universal Unification, 7th International Conference on Automated Deduction, LNCS 170(1984),1–42.

    Google Scholar 

  13. M. Schmidt-Schauss: Implication of Clauses is Undecidable, Theoretical Computer Science 59 (1988), 287–296.

    Google Scholar 

  14. S. Stenlund: Combinators, λ-Terms and Proof Theory, Reidel Publ. Comp. 1971.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Egon Börger Hans Kleine Büning Michael M. Richter

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1990 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Leitsch, A. (1990). Deciding Horn classes by hyperresolution. In: Börger, E., Büning, H.K., Richter, M.M. (eds) CSL '89. CSL 1989. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 440. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-52753-2_42

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-52753-2_42

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-52753-4

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-540-47137-0

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics