Skip to main content

New ways for developing proof theories for first-order multi modal logics

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
CSL '89 (CSL 1989)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNCS,volume 440))

Included in the following conference series:

  • 130 Accesses

Abstract

Most of the nonclassical logics, temporal logics, process logics etc., which have been used for the specification and verification of processes are essentially extensions of modal logics. In this paper a quite complex first-order many-sorted multi modal logic (MM-Logic) with modal operators referring to a basic branching accessibility relation, its reflexive, transitive and reflexive-transitive closure, indexed modal operators, ‘eventually’ operators, ‘until’ operators and built-in equality is defined. It can serve as temporal, action, process or epistemic logic in various applications. The main purpose of this paper, however, is to demonstrate the development of a proof theory using the translation (into predicate logic) and refutation (with predicate logic resolution and paramodulation) paradigm. MM-Logic formulae are first translated into an intermediate logic called Context Logic (CL) and then with the standard translator from CL into an order-sorted predicate logic where a standard theorem prover can be used. The CL translation mechanism which simplifies the development of proof theories for complex nonclassical logics is briefly described.

This work was supported by the Sonderforschungsbereich 314 of the German Science Foundation (DFG) and the ESPRIT Project 1033, FORMAST, of the European Community. The original paper was written during a research stay at the Automated Reasoning Project of the Australian National University, Canberra.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. R.S. Boyer, J.S. Moore: A Computational Logic. Academic Press 1979.

    Google Scholar 

  2. M. Chan. The Recursive Resolution Method. New Generation Computing, 5 pp. 155–183, 1987.

    Google Scholar 

  3. C.-L. Chang, R.C.-T. Lee, Symbolic Logic and Mechanical Theorem Proving. Science and Applied Mathematics Series (ed. W. Rheinboldt), Academic Press, New York, 1973.

    Google Scholar 

  4. M.C. Clarke, E.A. Emerson. Design and Synthesis of Synchronization Skeletons using Branching Time Temporal Logic. Lecture Notes in Computer Science 131, Springer Verlag, New York, 1981, pp. 52–71.

    Google Scholar 

  5. P. Enjalbert, Y. Auffray. Modal Theorem Proving: An Equational Viewpoint Submitted to IJCAI 89.

    Google Scholar 

  6. L. Fariñas del Cerro, A.Herzig Quantified Modal Logic and Unification Theory Langages et Systèmes Informatique, Université Paul Sabatier, Toulouse. Rapport LSI no 293, jan. 1988. See also L. Fariñas del Cerro, A. Herzig Linear Modal Deductions. Proc. of 9th Conference on Automated Deduction, pp. 487–499, 1988.

    Google Scholar 

  7. M.C. Fitting. Tableau methods of proof for modal logics. Notre Dame Journal of Formal Logic, XIII:237–247,1972.

    Google Scholar 

  8. M.C. Fitting. Proof methods for modal and intuitionistic logics. Vol. 169 of Synthese Library, D. Reidel Publishing Company, 1983.

    Google Scholar 

  9. G. Grätzer. Universal Algebra. Springer Verlag (1979).

    Google Scholar 

  10. J.Y. Halpern and Y. Moses. A guide to modal logics of knowledge and belief: preliminary draft. In Proc. of 9th IJCAI, pp 479–490, 1985.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Herzig, A, @ PhD Thesis, Université Paul Sabatier, Toulouse.

    Google Scholar 

  12. G.E. Hughes, M.J. Cresswell. An Introduction to Modal Logics. Methuen & Co., London, 1986.

    Google Scholar 

  13. J. Hintikka. Knowledge and Belief. Cornell University Press, Ithaca, New York, 1962.

    Google Scholar 

  14. K. Konolige. A Deduction Model of Belief and its Logics. Research Notes in Artificial Intelligence, Pitman, London, 1986.

    Google Scholar 

  15. S. Kripke. A Completeness Theorem in Modal Logic. J. of Symbolic Logic, Vol 24, 1959, pp 1–14.

    Google Scholar 

  16. S. Kripke. Semantical analysis of modal logic I, normal propositional calculi. Zeitschrift für mathematische Logik und Grundlagen der Mathematik, Vol. 9, 1963, pp 67–96.

    Google Scholar 

  17. H.J. Levesque. A logic of knowledge and active belief. Proc. of American Association of Artificial Intelligence, University of Texas, Austin 1984.

    Google Scholar 

  18. D. Loveland: Automated Theorem Proving: A Logical Basis. Fundamental Studies in Computer Science, Vol. 6, North-Holland, New York 1978.

    Google Scholar 

  19. R.C. Moore. Reasoning about Knowledge and Action. PhD Thesis, MIT, Cambridge 1980.

    Google Scholar 

  20. H.J. Ohlbach. A Resolution Calculus for Modal Logics Thesis, FB. Informatik, University of Kaiserslautern, 1988.

    Google Scholar 

  21. H.J. Ohlbach. Context Logic. SEKI Report SR-89-8, FB. Informatik, Univ. of Kaiserslautern.

    Google Scholar 

  22. J.A. Robinson. A Machine Oriented Logic Based on the Resolution Principle J.ACM, Vol. 12, No 1, 1965, 23–41.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Robinson, G., Wos, L. Paramodulation and theorem provcing in first order theories with equality. Machine Intelligence 4, American Elsevier, New York, pp. 135–150, 1969.

    Google Scholar 

  24. Schmidt-Schauß, M. A Many-Sorted Calculus with Polymorphic Functions Based on Resolution and Paramodulation. Proc. of 9th IJCAI, Los Angeles, 1985, 1162–1168.

    Google Scholar 

  25. Schmidt-Schauß, M. Computational aspects of an order-sorted logic with term declarations. Thesis, FB. Informatik, University of Kaiserslautern, 1988.

    Google Scholar 

  26. R.M. Smullyan. First Order Logic, Springer Verlag, Berlin 1968.

    Google Scholar 

  27. M. Stickel. Automated Deduction by Theory Resolution. Journal of Automated Reasoning Vol. 1, No. 4, 1985, pp 333–356.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. L.A. Wallen. Matrix proof methods for modal logics. In Proc. of 10th IJCAI, 1987.

    Google Scholar 

  29. C. Walther: A Many-sorted Calculus Based on Resolution and Paramodulation. Research Notes in Artifical Intelligence, Pitman Ltd., London, M. Kaufmann Inc., Los Altos, 1987.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Egon Börger Hans Kleine Büning Michael M. Richter

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1990 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Ohlbach, H.J. (1990). New ways for developing proof theories for first-order multi modal logics. In: Börger, E., Büning, H.K., Richter, M.M. (eds) CSL '89. CSL 1989. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 440. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-52753-2_46

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-52753-2_46

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-52753-4

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-540-47137-0

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics